Another homo marriage activist found to be a pedo

[musterion]

Sounds familiar. Even lets people call him daddy.

http://www.allexperts.com/ep/944-52124/Episcopalians/Ray-McIntyre.htm

 

[musterion]

Could be because they don't think it's very bad.
Or, they do think it's bad, but don't want to be called a hater for despising perversion; because that's what it's come to ........ if you despise perversion, you are labeled a hater.

Now I feel confident that Anna does not think peds are OK.

But yeah, it is kinda distracting to make a post about a disgusting pedo, and instead of replying "Disgusting pervert!", you get "How come you didn't talk about a hetro pedo instead of homo pedo?"

With all the homo, peds, and transgender perversions going on and even getting sympathy and acceptance, America is turning into a freak show.
Being a pervert or a complete cuckoo bird seems to be all the rage these days.
It has become COOL instead of shameful.

And I don't think the list of perversion to become acceptable is anywhere near complete yet.

I'm wondering if we can agree on this much: people like Anna never condemn homosexual child rape AS SIN because they think homosexuality itself is not sin. Hear me out on this.

To them, homosexuality is an alternate but perfectly normal expression of human love and sexuality (just as the Sodomites that Lot dealt with believed), and so are deeply offended whenever we point out God calls it sin.

But Anna and company paint themselves into corners with the many cases of "chicken hawks" who insist that desiring and pursuing sex with boys is a true expression of their "love," just as it was said to be back in ancient Greece. NAMBLA used to be included as part of the larger homosexual movement for a very good reason: many homosexuals to this day consider "boy love" a proud tradition with a long history, as if that proves it's okay. Well, they're right about the long tradition part. Thousands of years worth of tradition. In their minds, history is on THEIR side and that makes raping boys okay.

So in cases like this one, that's exactly the point where Anna et al always start irrelevant distractions by (a) bringing up hetero child rapists (b) trying to reframe the discussion in terms of mere illegality, of mental illness, of poor choices. . .but never in terms of SIN. They do either or both every single time.

Failing those, that's where the last ditch of "Judge not" is invoked, which is hilarious...quoting one part of the Bible to refute another part of the Bible.

What they're doing is obvious: suppressing the truth in unrighteousness avoiding the one point they want to avoid most of all -- that homosexuality is sin and will be judged by God.

Nick nailed it long ago. They're sodomy-approving, sin-loving perverts who evidently believe God is a liar and do not really believe His Word, whatever claims to Christianity they may have (or had, in Anna's case).

And I don't think the list of perversion to become acceptable is anywhere near complete yet.

That's for sure. Pandora's box never closes itself.

 

[annabenedetti]

But sodomites and their defenders like Anna, Purex and the other leftists here go to great lengths to deny or downplay that homosexuals do this, to the point of claiming (and it has been claimed) that they're not REAL homosexuals, even that they're (somehow) straights in denial. It's idiocy because they're idiots.

Now that's just another of your useful lies, which is countered by my posts on this very thread.

As for the "not REAL homosexuals," I won't believe that either until you provide some proof. I'm going to the movies pretty soon, but I'll check back later to see your quotes on that.

I'm soooooo disappointed to see you you have no quotes to back up your assertion that I ever said anything close to your above. Not surprised, though.

 

[annabenedetti]

I'm wondering if we can agree on this much: people like Anna never condemn homosexual child rape AS SIN because they think homosexuality itself is not sin. Hear me out on this.

To them, homosexuality is an alternate but perfectly normal expression of human love and sexuality (just as the Sodomites that Lot dealt with believed), and so are deeply offended whenever we point out God calls it sin.

But Anna and company paint themselves into corners with the many cases of "chicken hawks" who insist that desiring and pursuing sex with boys is a true expression of their "love," just as it was said to be back in ancient Greece. NAMBLA used to be included as part of the larger homosexual movement for a very good reason: many homosexuals to this day consider "boy love" a proud tradition with a long history, as if that proves it's okay. Well, they're right about the long tradition part. Thousands of years worth of tradition. In their minds, history is on THEIR side and that makes raping boys okay.

So in cases like this one, that's exactly the point where Anna et al always start irrelevant distractions by (a) bringing up hetero child rapists (b) trying to reframe the discussion in terms of mere illegality, of mental illness, of poor choices. . .but never in terms of SIN. They do either or both every single time.

Failing those, that's where the last ditch of "Judge not" is invoked, which is hilarious...quoting one part of the Bible to refute another part of the Bible.

What they're doing is obvious: suppressing the truth in unrighteousness avoiding the one point they want to avoid most of all -- that homosexuality is sin and will be judged by God.

Nick nailed it long ago. They're sodomy-approving, sin-loving perverts who evidently believe God is a liar and do not really believe His Word, whatever claims to Christianity they may have (or had, in Anna's case).



That's for sure. Pandora's box never closes itself.

You posted this in the politics forum. Expect that some of the posts are going to focus on the legal/criminality aspect of the subject, and if you wanted to control the direction of the conversation such that you only had to read strictly religious viewpoints that focused on the sin aspect, you could have posted this in religion. You could have been even more controlling and posted it in the EC forum. However - here we are, in politics, and whether it galls you to no end or not ( I think you're secretly pleased, because you were trolling for responses from "people like Anna" in your other thread), I'm talking about the legality of homosexual behavior and the criminality of sexual predation of children (regardless of the orientation of the criminal perpetrator).

As for saying that I think raping boys is okay: You're a liar, using your version of Christian taqiyya, in which you allow yourself the right to lie about people in the process of "evangelizing."

 

[annabenedetti]

Now I feel confident that Anna does not think peds are OK.

Thank you. You'd be right, and musterion, saying I think raping boys is okay, is a liar.

But yeah, it is kinda distracting to make a post about a disgusting pedo, and instead of replying "Disgusting pervert!", you get "How come you didn't talk about a hetro pedo instead of homo pedo?"

There are three threads by musterion and Nick on the first page of the politics forum, all three of them referencing homosexuality and child molestation. I don't expect either one of them to post a thread about fathers molesting daughters, uncles raping nieces, brothers molesting sisters (Duggar family, anyone?), or "he was a good guy, a good family friend, we had no idea... " grooming a girl for years.

 

[Tambora]

In your opinion.

That's what counts.

 

[PureX]

Could be because they don't think it's very bad.
Or, they do think it's bad, but don't want to be called a hater for despising perversion; because that's what it's come to ........ if you despise perversion, you are labeled a hater.

Or it could be because they know the subject is only being brought up to imply that all homosexuals are pedophiles.

That is the reason musterion is only posting about homosexual pedophiles, after all. And he is attempting to promote a lie. Because homosexuals are no more inclined to be pedophiles than heterosexuals are.

Now I feel confident that Anna does not think peds are OK.

No one here thinks pedophiles are OK. No one here thinks pedophilia is not a horrible crime against children. And if you think anyone where, does, then you need to seriously examine your own biases, because they are becoming seriously slanderous toward others.

But yeah, it is kinda distracting to make a post about a disgusting pedo, and instead of replying "Disgusting pervert!", you get "How come you didn't talk about a hetro pedo instead of homo pedo?"

Are you really looking for condemnation rally against pedophilia? Do you really need a condemnation rally against it? Does sitting around condemning the sins of others on the internet make you feel good?

The reason I objected to this thread is that I know the intent was to promote a lie. It was to promote the lie that all homosexuals are pedophiles. And worse, it's a lie intended to inspire hatred and loathing against homosexuals. And this needs to be shown for what it is.

With all the homo, peds, and transgender perversions going on and even getting sympathy and acceptance, America is turning into a freak show.

The more the bigots insist that we all hate and loath homosexuals, the more sympathy the homosexuals will get from the general public, who does not believe in hating and loathing other people just because they have "sinned" according to your religion. All this acceptance that you religious bigots keep bemoaning is a direct reaction to your own mean-spirtied desire to punish others according to your religious beliefs. Most Americans will not accept that. Even against homosexuals.

Being a pervert or a complete cuckoo bird seems to be all the rage these days.
It has become COOL instead of shameful.

And the more you insist on shaming and punishing your fellow citizens for not obeying your religious ideology, the more people will reject you and your religious ideology.

And I don't think the list of perversion to become acceptable is anywhere near complete yet.

No one really cares what you think is perverse, anymore. Or me, either. But then why should they have ever? What matters is that the law protects us from each other. And does so equally.

 

[Rusha]

Or it could be because they know the subject is only being brought up to imply that all homosexuals are pedophiles.

That is the reason musterion is only posting about homosexual pedophiles, after all. And he is attempting to promote a lie. Because homosexuals are no more inclined to be pedophiles than heterosexuals are.

^ This.

 

[Rusha]

Thank you. You'd be right, and musterion, saying I think raping boys is okay, is a liar.

There are three threads by musterion and Nick on the first page of the politics forum, all three of them referencing homosexuality and child molestation. I don't expect either one of them to post a thread about fathers molesting daughters, uncles raping nieces, brothers molesting sisters (Duggar family, anyone?), or "he was a good guy, a good family friend, we had no idea... " grooming a girl for years.

Indeed. It's never about the crime, but rather WHO is committing the crime. These threads are only venomous when those who are accused of sexual assault and predatory behavior just happen to be Muslims or gay.

 

[annabenedetti]

^ This.

Agree.

 

[shagster01]

I bet he would

I've brought up the heterosexual Republican Trump delegate that got caught with child porn several times but nobody seems to care or want to talk about that guy.

 

[Rusha]

Homosexuality is not a perversion.

Indeed ... like heterosexuality, it's neutral. As we can see, the only way to paint homosexuality as evil is with intentionally misleading rhetoric that insinuates that all homosexual are child predators.

 

[shagster01]

Tell that to the Christian bakers forced to decorate cakes celebrating sodomy.

You consider sodomy a religious belief?

 

[patrick jane]

Indeed ... like heterosexuality, it's neutral. As we can see, the only way to paint homosexuality as evil is with intentionally misleading rhetoric that insinuates that all homosexual are child predators.

IMO, most child predators are gay and perverted.

 

[annabenedetti]

The reason I objected to this thread is that I know the intent was to promote a lie. It was to promote the lie that all homosexuals are pedophiles. And worse, it's a lie intended to inspire hatred and loathing against homosexuals. And this needs to be shown for what it is.

:up:

 

[Rusha]

IMO, most child predators are gay and perverted.

You, like everyone else, have a right to your *opinion*. That doesn't make such accusations any less false or misleading. Here's a question for you though:

How should one respond if they have knowledge or information that someone else IS a predator who has committed an actual crime? I would report them to the police. One has to wonder why there is so much huffing and puffing and so little reporting go on. :think:

Though in this case, I know exactly why.

 

[PureX]

IMO, most child predators are gay and perverted.

At this point, you've posted so many absurdly stupid and blatantly untrue things that your opinion isn't worth much. Sorry.

 

[Rusha]

I've brought up the heterosexual Republican Trump delegate that got caught with child porn several times but nobody seems to care or want to talk about that guy.

I wonder why he gets a pass .... :think:

 

[annabenedetti]

I smell derp.

Oh. Artie.

Lovely mature Christian response. I see you're busy practicing your evangelism again.

 

[annabenedetti]

Who are you to judge? You don't believe the Bible. You don't even believe in your old church anymore. You have zero authority to appeal to on any matter whatsoever. All you have is your leftist programming and your adolescent feeeeeeeeeeeeeewings that you want to impose on everyone else.

Beat it, hypocrite.

Judge not, Anna...the measure you're using to judge me will be measured back to you and then some.

Failing those, that's where the last ditch of "Judge not" is invoked, which is hilarious..

:chuckle: