82% women miscarry after vaccination

G

Gary K

New member
Banned
The New England Medical Journal just published a study that find women who get pregnant after getting the coronavirus "vaccine" miscarry.

These vaccines are depopulation scheme. Anyone who takes one of these vaccines is taking their life in their hands, and the lives of the prospective children.

www.nejm.org

Preliminary Findings of mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine Safety in Pregnant Persons | NEJM

Original Article from The New England Journal of Medicine — Preliminary Findings of mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine Safety in Pregnant Persons
www.nejm.org
 
Derf

Derf

Well-known member
ffreeloader said:
The New England Medical Journal just published a study that find women who get pregnant after getting the coronavirus "vaccine" miscarry.

These vaccines are depopulation scheme. Anyone who takes one of these vaccines is taking their life in their hands, and the lives of the prospective children.

www.nejm.org

Preliminary Findings of mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine Safety in Pregnant Persons | NEJM

Original Article from The New England Journal of Medicine — Preliminary Findings of mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine Safety in Pregnant Persons
www.nejm.org
Click to expand...

Carolina said:
This study says no such thing. Are you pulling our collective legs?
Click to expand...
What’s up, ffreeloader? Where did you see 82% had miscarriages?
 
M

marke

Well-known member
User Name said:
www.reuters.com

Fact Check-There is no evidence that COVID-19 vaccines have caused hundreds of miscarriages

A widely shared blog post has claimed 920 women have had a miscarriage as a result of receiving a COVID-19 vaccine. However, officials in Britain and the United States told Reuters there is no evidence of an increased risk.
www.reuters.com www.reuters.com
Click to expand...
The FDA has now added a new warning that the covid vaccine may cause Guillian-Barre disease. If you are a democrat, just ignore all the warnings and take the government-mandated vaccine. All others should not take the vaccine until science can prove it is safe.

www.theepochtimes.com

FDA to Add Warning About Neurological Disorder Linked to Johnson & Johnson COVID-19 Vaccine

www.theepochtimes.com www.theepochtimes.com
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) on July 12 said it will add a warning label to Johnson & Johnson’s COVID-19 vaccine that it is linked to a rare neurological disorder known as Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS), while J&J confirmed it is “in discussions” with federal agencies.
“The FDA is announcing revisions to the vaccine recipient and vaccination provider fact sheets for the Johnson & Johnson (Janssen) COVID-19 Vaccine to include information pertaining to an observed increased risk of Guillain-Barré Syndrome (GBS) following vaccination,” an FDA spokesperson told The Epoch Times on July 12.
 
G

Gary K

New member
Banned
I guess most of you people are math challenged. You don't seem to be able to see how data is misrepresented and hidden right in front of your eyes.

In Table 4 the fine print shows the deception. There is a line there for those who spontaneously aborted at less than 28 weeks: in the first two trimesters of pregnancy. Then it count's total pregnancies of 827. That is false as 700 women received their vaccination in the 3rd trimester of their pregnancy. Why are those women counted when the spontaneous abortions occurred before the third trimester of the pregnancy? It's nothing but a blatant attempt to hide the seriousness of the numbers when getting vaccinated early in pregnancy.

So, you remove the 700 women who received the shot late in their pregnancy and count only the women who were vaccinated early in their pregnancy and it's no long 127 out of 827 but 104 out of 127 women who spontaneously aborted in their first two trimesters after receiving their vaccinations early in their pregnancy. That's 82% of women vaccinated early in their pregnancy who spontaneously aborted. The timing is significant.
 
Skeeter

Skeeter

Well-known member
Banned
ffreeloader said:
I guess most of you people are math challenged. You don't seem to be able to see how data is misrepresented and hidden right in front of your eyes.

In Table 4 the fine print shows the deception. There is a line there for those who spontaneously aborted at less than 28 weeks: in the first two trimesters of pregnancy. Then it count's total pregnancies of 827. That is false as 700 women received their vaccination in the 3rd trimester of their pregnancy. Why are those women counted when the spontaneous abortions occurred before the third trimester of the pregnancy? It's nothing but a blatant attempt to hide the seriousness of the numbers when getting vaccinated early in pregnancy.

So, you remove the 700 women who received the shot late in their pregnancy and count only the women who were vaccinated early in their pregnancy and it's no long 127 out of 827 but 104 out of 127 women who spontaneously aborted in their first two trimesters after receiving their vaccinations early in their pregnancy. That's 82% of women vaccinated early in their pregnancy who spontaneously aborted. The timing is significant.
Click to expand...
BUT this table includes only a subset of all the pregnancies. "Among 827 participants who had a completed pregnancy, the pregnancy resulted in a live birth in 712 (86.1%), in a spontaneous abortion in 104 (12.6%)." This only involves spontaneous abortions after completed pregnancies. Forget math skills. Bone up on reading comprehension.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top