31 Reasons To Reject The Jab

[Nick M]

Among 3410 total cases of suspected but unconfirmed COVID-19 in the overall study
population, 1594 occurred in the vaccine group vs. 1816 in the placebo group. Suspected
COVID-19 cases that occurred within 7 days after any vaccination were 409 in the vaccine
group vs. 287 in the placebo group.

Actually, Pfizer said the doses increased infection. Which we saw play out over time. This came out in 2020. It was censored. I was kicked off IG where I didn't put things up for putting things like this up. This is the FDA report, and it is Pfizer's research. More importantly, in the fall of 2020, with all the deaths in April, May, June....people pieced together data. Because the CDC would not put it out. There were no excessive deaths. There are now. After the vaccine, unexplainable deaths have skyrocketed in the youth who are "vaccinated."



This is all deaths with death with coronavirus included as a category. The point of it is that the ratio in younger people is the same as all deaths. In other words, there was no pandemic. No, we didn't know it at the time. This was one of the first things I saw.

 

[Clete]

the public should absolutely have been informed of BOTH those factors, which they clearly were not at the time.

Thank you for conceding the entire point.

Good grief you are weirdly aggressive in your stupidity! I've never seen anyone act as if they WANT to be an idiot.

 

[SwordOfTruth]

Thank you for conceding the entire point.

Good grief you are weirdly aggressive in your stupidity! I've never seen anyone act as if they WANT to be an idiot.

Lol backpeddling much !

at the time, it looked like getting Covid was the riskier choice to make. Indeed, at the time, it was the riskier move to make, by far!

It was never so. The riskier move was always taking an un-fully-tested medical treatment, founded in Gene Therapy, which was being marketed as a vaccine and being very aggressively pushed by Pharma and all its useful idiots along the food chain. A treatment that didn't prevent transmission of the virus, which didn't prevent you getting Covid-19 and which was only permitted to be used (at the time) under "Emergency Usage Authority" rather than being a fully approved product.

Aside from all the above, it's not possible to be generalistic in regards to such treatments for every individual's personal circumstances are different. Each person has different health statusues, different reactivities to drugs and treatments, different ages, different strengths of immune systems and so on. There is no single answer to any of the associated issues. The choice of risking getting Covid and risking an un-fully-tested medical treatment was an individual choice to be made for every person. That choice could only ever be effectively and accurately made if ALL the associated information and data was made available to the person allowing them to make an informed decision. Such informtion was not made available. Hence nobody who took the shots could have given informed consent.

 

[Clete]

Lol backpeddling much !



It was never so. The riskier move was always taking an un-fully-tested medical treatment, founded in Gene Therapy, which was being marketed as a vaccine and being very aggressively pushed by Pharma and all its useful idiots along the food chain. A treatment that didn't prevent transmission of the virus, which didn't prevent you getting Covid-19 and which was only permitted to be used (at the time) under "Emergency Usage Authority" rather than being a fully approved product.

Aside from all the above, it's not possible to be generalistic in regards to such treatments for every individual's personal circumstances are different. Each person has different health statusues, different reactivities to drugs and treatments, different ages, different strengths of immune systems and so on. There is no single answer to any of the associated issues. The choice of risking getting Covid and risking an un-fully-tested medical treatment was an individual choice to be made for every person. That choice could only ever be effectively and accurately made if ALL the associated information and data was made available to the person allowing them to make an informed decision. Such informtion was not made available. Hence nobody who took the shots could have given informed consent.

Once again, thank you for making my point for me.

You're too stupid for it even to be profitable to mock!

Good bye!

 

[SwordOfTruth]

The only point you've made is that you're out of your depth on this particular topic.