Search results

This is Calvinist stupidity. Literally, Marke, it's stupidity. It's no different than believing that Marvel Comic books are a record of real events. You're right about one thing, though! No amount of genius could ever compute the notion with "natural mathematical formulas" (I have no idea what...

JR already handled this quite well and so I won't go into detail here except to say that there isn't anything the slightest bit irrational about 2 Peter 3:8. The verse isn't try to tell you that a thousand years IS a day to God and and that a day IS a thousand years. It's an expression with a...

Okay look, I've had some things happening around here that have gotten me on edge and so I'm going to take your word for it and chalk it up to me just being an idiot. If that's your answer then you don't understand the question. All you did was make the distinction between the person's of the...

I Corinthians 2:14 is not talking about that basic tenets of the gospel, marke! I've already addressed this? Why won't you have a discussion with anyone? Anyone who can read can be shown the spiritual things of God. And, even without the written word, God has shown everyone to the point that...

What? You're moving the goal post here, marke. You are making that claim that somehow Dartman, and presumably anyone else who dissagrees sufficiently with your doctrine, that they don't get it because they CANNOT get it. That there's something broken that makes them incapable of understanding...

:ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO:

You're condescending and insulting. Yeah, no kidding. The Son and the Father are also One and in more important ways that what we can either say or even understand. There's a lot more distinctions than that. God the Son is the God who not only became a man but also DIED and who lives again...

Really? Prove it, hypocrite! Put up or shut up time, Idolater! You think you're so damn superior to me then show us all your Catholic wisdom! Liar. Prove me wrong! I dare you. You won't even try.

Verses that @Dartman does not read... John 10:17 “Therefore My Father loves Me, because I lay down My life that I may take it again. 18 No one takes it from Me, but I lay it down of Myself. I have power to lay it down, and I have power to take it again. This command I have received from My...

Blah blah blah. Jesus is God in the flesh - period. It isn't half as complicated as people, particularly bishops, make it out to be. What's so hard about understanding the idea that God became a human being? Sure, there's is, as you say, a distinction between God the Father, God the Son and...

Why? They may have a hard time accepting it as true but that isn't the same thing at all. Why would it be harder for the average Joe to conceptualize that idea than it was for you to write that sentence? The doctrine of the Trinity is a difficult subject for anyone, including believers, isn't...

LOL!!! :ROFLMAO: Well, all I can say is, this clown isn't afraid to make a fool of himself! I can't tell if he's blind to it or if he just doesn't care. He who is evil, let him be evil still.

Okay, I can go with a potential misunderstanding. Let's talk it out. Think it through, as it were. The phrase "spiritual truths" is pretty broad. What spiritual truths are you talking about? Romans 1 makes it painfully clear that spiritual truths such as God's existence and right and wrong are...

You have a choice, Idolater. In fact, that is the first of Luther's 95 theses! "Our Lord and Master Jesus Christ, when He said "Repent", willed that the whole life of believers should be repentance." - Martin Luther No, it's entirely correct. Have you ever bothered to read the 95 Theses that...

Well, that's stupidity. First of all, God becoming a man isn't anything close to being "the deeper understanding of the word of God". On the contrary, its the prima facia teaching of the New Testament and the core teaching of the entire Christian faith. I mean, you couldn't get any more...

This is EXACTLY correct. You should, however, be careful not to be a hypocrite. It's insulting in the extreme that you would equate his cultish manner of handling scripture with Protestantism. That displays a level of ignorance about the Reformation and what it was about that puts you in a...

Why do you keep saying this? That isn't true at all! The incarnation isn't difficult to understand whatsoever. Are there aspects of God's nature that we don't understand? Of course! But the idea that Jesus is God incarnate, isn't one of them. The first chapter of John isn't hard to follow at...

You're a liar, Dartman! The best argument against your doctrine is that fact that you are incapable of debating it honestly. What are you even doing here? What possible benefit could you think you're deriving from this? WHY will you not respond to the things presented against your doctrine...

Perhaps indirectly. While he gets credit, in one way or the other, for all the evil in the cosmos, my bet is that Satan doesn't even know that Dartman exists.

There isn't anything mystical about Dartman's understand or lack thereof. He chooses to "misunderstand" and ignore the truth that has been clearly shown to him in this very thread and probably dozens of times before.