Search results

That's all you'll ever get. Brain is the worst combination of ignorant and unwilling to learn.

Do you understand the implications of the fact that E=mc2 can be derived both from relativity and Modern Mechanics?

When you stop counting adherents to ideas, you might be able to rationally assess the ideas.

So, let's count. Rational responses from Brain: 0. Invective and mockery: Everything else. "What use are you?"

We know. You hate a rational discussion.

Modus ponens

"Pretty straightforward." But watch the vitriol.

It's easy to tell when a Darwinist is flustered. He starts umming. Of course they are. Fact, fact, conclusion is the rational presentation of an idea. You have nothing but hatred for ideas, so you'll do anything to avoid engaging sensibly. Fact: Organisms adapt. Fact: Vaccines change the...

Apart from the one you ignored. We know you don't actually care about the source of an idea. You just want something to ridicule. That way you can avoid a sensible assessment of the facts. Organisms adapt. Fact. Vaccines change the environment for a virus. Fact. The vaccines are driving the...

You'll need to put forward something more than that. Because the time between proposition A and proposition B has no impact on the veracity of either. Because we can derive the exact same formula, E=mc2, from both propositions. Applying the same formula derived from competing theories does...

Typical Darwinist. Watch carefully: "Supposition": The vaccines are driving the pandemic. "Back up": 1. Organisms adapt. 2. Vaccines affect environments. Prediction: The only thing Brain has in response until a fellow Darwinist posts something he can latch onto is ridicule, invective and...

But you won't explain how what I say cannot be correct. Organisms adapt to their environment. It's true, but all Brain has is invective. The vaccines alter the environment of the virus. Accurate, but Brain is dismissive. The vaccines are driving the pandemic. A reasonable conclusion given...

Oh. I forgot unrestrained vitriol.

There's a very straightforward case that has been presented to you: 1. Relative motion has been modeled using classical mechanics. 2. Observations showed that those formulas did not hold up in extreme cases. 3. Einstein introduced a correction that he called relativity, which requires the...

His problem is a hatred of truth and an inability to form coherent arguments. Typically, he relies on his Darwinist allies for material to parrot.

The solution to many political controversies is simple: The government should not be involved.

🤷 I did. But all you do is whinge. Actually, I've got what I wrote. Nope.

"Mutation" is the language of the Darwinist. Organisms do mutate, but that does not contribute to adaptation.

When you throw a stone at a pack of dogs, the one that yelps is the one you hit.

Nope. Never did I ever equate COVID-19 to a "mild case of the flu." They were and still are. Slow down. Breathe. Now try grammar. The vaccines are driving the pandemic.