Search results

Flattening a fish and the sediment it is in requires great pressure applied very swiftly. It was achieved by the final collapse (at that depth) of a liquefaction cell. But this is kinda a rabbit trail. :D

I'm not arguing with you. Also, this is not a point that requires a correction on my part. Pressure is not a necessary component of the rock-making process.

Why? What are judges going to do? Ban the media?

Maybe he didn't know he was doing it. It's as generous as I can get. :D Not really. The only harm that would arise from relativity being overturned would be to egos. The degree to which it is implausible is not a factor I can quantify. Either the math works or it doesn't. Relativity...

Who works in the international media realm. If you don't know how US establishments manipulated the 2020 election, you're a waste of space in any sensible conversation. Wait. That was already well known about you. :chuckle:

Are you one of those mad conspiracy nuts who thinks that former vice president Joebiden won the election?

For anyone following along, we're talking about this video: Maybe. Maybe it has been noticed plenty of times. Maybe Steven is the first. I don't think it makes much difference either way. Isn't what I've shown what we're discussing? Einstein sought to explain the discrepancies between...

For some rocks. Ever mixed concrete? Depends. Is the fossil a 2D or 3D structure? A 3D structure would be impossible under too much pressure. There is always going to be pressure involved in rock formation, but the only necessary items and processes are the ones I outlined. Mix water...

Actually, I think the math at this point is fairly elementary. It's easier when it's written down in front of you. It starts getting difficult when it goes into the Tau function. "It is a spherical wave if you take the objective of the moving observer" - that is exactly what the proof is...

He has a book.

Einstein's derivation of E=mc2 is based on a distance/time calculation that has a big ugly ol' square root in the denominator. Back in his time, there were no fancy computers to calculate such things. However, they did have a tool called a Taylor series that could provide approximations of the...

E≈mc2

Explaining how light slows down is not a very good way to prove that it doesn't slow down. This is word mash. A "unit" of time cannot be the same thing as a "concept" of time. Words have meaning. Those words have different meanings. Do I have to share it a seventh time? Because you say so...

You don't know what you're talking about. Light is slowed down by passing through a glass of water. There needs to be a distinction when we talk about a "unit of time" and the "concept of time." They cannot be the same thing. You cannot declare that you "adhere to Einstein's theories," but...

Here's the problem: You have a theological agenda and have invented a theory of physics that you can't explain and nobody else adheres to. When challenged on the theology, you appeal to Einstein using links that assume the primacy of his ideas. But when Einstein is challenged, you agree with the...

Have fun staying stupid.

When you go back and retract the numerous nonsense posts you've made, then you can explain these reports to me.

Typical. Called on his useless attempts at argument, posts links he's never read, let alone understood.

It's surprising that the Darwinists don't gravitate more toward what is going on with untested vaccines pushed into a population amid a pandemic. The Chinese-US-made disease that emerged from the Wuhan lab is all but gone. It is the variants, which the vaccines forced into the foreground, that...