Search results

As an outsider, I get a clear view of this. You're being part of the problem. The problem is the rape of two teenage girls (by a boy in a dress in their bathroom facilities at a government facility). That's what the focus needs to be. (y)

Yep. I described the hand clearly. I had 86s. Yeah. I know nothing about it. 😆😆😂🤣 Funny, you do nothing but post the TOL equivalent of 27o. 😁 Am I a conspiracy theorist for saying that big tech and the establishment media colluded to favor joebiden? You gotta play the hand you're dealed...

Mmm.. dinner. Meanwhile... https://rumble.com/vobocf-ted-cruz-breaks-ag-garland-over-nsba-letter.html

Reality, remember? I had 86s. Two pair. I would almost never arrive at a flop with 27o, which you seem to think is the worst hand. It's actually more profitable than some other combinations. I'd rather have 2h7c than 43s. Especially on an 86K flop. Admittedly the preference is only because the...

Wait. Wait. Wait. Wait a minute. Hold on. You're calling with ace high now?! Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha. This is precious. We have to set up a game. :LOL: Oh, don't you worry about that. I've got the html saved, screenshots of every page and waybackmachine archives of this...

Probably a Fed.

On a K,8,6 board? Learn to deal with reality. You lost that one. There's always the next hand. :LOL: Are you still on that bandwagon? A conspiracy is a few people with a secret, usually criminal, plan. A conspiracy theorist is someone who thinks that such a group exists. You accuse us of...

I don't want anything. I couldn't care less who the US president is. Zero cares. The issue here is that you spout nothing but obvious nonsense. When called on it you turn to obfuscation, diversion and semantic games. We would love a sensible discussion, but you're anathema to it.

Against your naked ace? :LOL: Two pair, pudding head. Eights over sixes. You name the time and place and we'll set up a table. Settle this once and for all. :LOL:

Yeah, you might have a semantic point. Call it an off-suit ace. You're betting the house with that? I call! I call! :LOL:

You mean like the just-announced investigation in Wisconsin? The one that started a day ago? The one that has been "debunked" already? Debunked "all over the place"?

Of course you are. You think that joebiden won last year's US election fair and square. Did you know that a level playing field would require the establishment media and big tech not to collude on action to favor the former VP?

When you recount the ballots you have, the number doesn't change. Looks like you missed the reason for the investigation. Also, this case hasn't been thrown out. It just started. But Brain knows better. :LOL:

Uh huh. And the case is ongoing. So much for your assertion that everything has been wrapped up.

Bye, loser. https://timcast.com/news/wisconsin-senate-launching-investigation-into-2020-election/

:LOL:

Try me. What are some reasons that I should not believe that the US media are 99 percent in the pockets of the Democrats?

Yep. That's probably the most obvious way that the election was stolen. There was that Twitter thread that outlined all these issues pretty clearly. Who was that by? It would be reasonable for a disinterested outside observer to not realize how brazen and pervasive this sort of activity is —...

Of course you are. No. You deny that numerous powerful entities put a lot of effort into swaying the vote toward joebiden. We know. You want to talk about nonsense issues and irrelevancies. What is my "second"? Of what relevance are civil lawsuits? They haven't even reached court. The firms...

But we know you don't care.