Search results

They can be both, right?

There was no evidence of force in the scenario, yet you would throw the book at the guy even though "it can't be determined if the husband forced her." All you are doing is destroying any foundation upon which you might challenge Fred's ideas.

So you would convict a man based on a lack of evidence.

Then retract your assessment

Actually, the flood is probably the reason there is lava on other heavenly bodies, most notably, the moon.

And yet you would find him guilty.

He's the greatest. :D

Simple. Fred put forward a scenario that involved no force. You found the hypothetical man guilty. Now you're trying to justify your idiotic response by pretending that your hypothetical should replace Fred's and asserting that the lack of evidence is evidence.

You can make up as many things as you like to put in bold font and insert into someone else's ideas. They are still not his ideas.

And you found him guilty. Do you need it spelled out in a larger font or something?

He presented a scenario that had no force. You called the man guilty.

Hello there, Stupid. I'm not advocating Fred's ideas. You judged a man guilty in the hypothetical situation where a woman had regret. You can't edit the posts. They are right there.

You're determined to believe that Fred said something that he didn't. You're a liar.

His scenario has no force. Then retract your assessment.

His scenario has no force. You find the man guilty.

You believe that a woman is justified in accusing a man because she has regrets. His scenario has no force. You find the man guilty.

Then respond honestly to the scenario that he presented. There was no force involved. You made it up.

He's silly, you're a dishonest liar. He presented a scenario, you changed it to chase your goal of demonizing him. There was none in the scenario he presented. You made it up. You contribute nothing but spam.

Too late. English, dude. English. Why do I have to address what Clete said? You're the liar, not him.

Lamely. This was not in the scenario. You made it up. You can read, right? That was not in the scenario. You made it up. That Fred does say this makes him an idiot. But you're the liar. You provide nothing but lame, repetitive and boring lies that add nothing to any discussion. Fun isn't it?