Search results

Of course there is. There is no evidence of rape, so the verdict should be "not guilty." Why is this so hard for you?

Yes. It's either "guilty" or it's "not guilty." Did you think you could just make up things to replace the scenario that was presented and pretend to be a useful part of the conversation?

Quiet at the front. Give the slowpokes a chance to answer.

Which should immediately prompt you to say "not guilty." Also, what evidence in his scenario would justify a conviction?

If anyone were to say guilty in Fred's scenario, they would face the death penalty under a real justice system, as would the two women.

You prattled on about your own scenario and ignored his. It was over in one word, but you screwed it up and it took you five pages to show where the answer actually lay. Be specific. What would it take, in your view, for the court to say guilty, given Fred's scenario? We're all happy that...

Great. A straight answer. What evidence would you need to convict? You should deal with what people say, not pretend that you are the arbiter of what they should say.

So should the court find the man guilty in Fred's scenario?

Can it be proved? How do you think the court should rule?

Yikes!! People read this drivel?

Yeah, sure what?!? So "not guilty"?

Should the court find him guilty?

So if he is guilty then you will find him guilty. Is he guilty?

So now you're finding guilt on the basis of "implied force"? There are a million reasons that would not justify your guilty conviction. There is no implied force. In fact, that there was a "Wednesday event" and only a complaint about Tuesday implies there was no force. You really are...

No. There was no force in his scenario, including any sense of there being a "JR situation." No. Your immediate response was "guilty." Two items from your imagination? There's a laugh.

What did I do now?

It doesn't look like comprehension on my part is the issue...

So you would find a man guilty with no evidence.

Oh, good. :D I've had many try to pass off nonsense such as: Genesis can't be an accurate description of history because it is poetry.

Then retract your response. I'm not arguing with you over things we agree on.