Search results

Nope. You made it up. You're a liar. That's called spam. What planet are you on? Clete is always disgusted and exasperated.

You were given a scenario. That scenario did not show evidence of force. You gave a verdict. What you want is for someone to have evil ideas that you can cry about, and you're so desperate for it that you invent the ideas for them. You provide nothing but spam.

Hmmm. Nobody knows what you're talking about. Nobody has said that a spouse has the right to force themselves on their partner. Nobody. I don't even need to have read any posts to know that's true. All we have are your inventions. I read the thread. It ain't here. It's only in your head...

He gave a verdict. He thinks it's rape if a woman has regrets.

Inventing ideas and making believe others hold them is dishonest and stupid. You bring nothing to this site but spam.

Nobody knows what you're talking about. Of course you are. Nobody has said that a spouse has the right to force themselves on their partner. I get it. It's a clumsy, stupid point of view. But it's not a dishonest load of spam, which is all you ever provide. Bye, loser.

You can't make things up for people to believe and pretend that you are a useful part of a conversation. You contribute nothing but spam.

I explained myself to Fred. Takeaway No. 1: Brain is a Muppet. Why? Because you can't handle reality?

Right. Now perhaps if you'd try understanding people instead of reading into their words the worst possible things, we could learn something. As it is, once again, you generate nothing but spam.

I think you're arguing a semantic point using language that is inappropriate. If a husband were to force himself, he would be charged with rape. I don't think it's worth trying to explain anything to Brain using that word. Wait. Remove the final three words of that second paragraph.

Great. So when you have something of interest to contribute, let us know. (y)

Yay. Let's pick a Darwinist with a history and pretend that his record contributes something to the discussion. Darwinists can never allow a sensible discussion of the evidence.

It's not okay to be gay...

Hey. Retards. Rapists should be executed, regardless of marital status.

Take it up with the people who maintain lists of logical fallacies. I can hold to any belief I like. Failings on my part do nothing to bolster your position. You received a challenge to what you believe. Deal with that instead of crawling into your shell and chucking stuff. Poisoning the well. :)

No.

I recognize that. That's the tu quoque fallacy. The intellectual equivalent of "I know you are but what am I?"

Wow. Brain has really lost it this time.

🤘🐑🉑🎅

With flat Earthers, the question that exposes them is the simplest one: Why? Why is the Earth flat?