Search results

Because it tests the idea that God could know while wills exist. We know why you hate the question and do not want it to exist.

You think you have a choice when there's only one outcome possible. How more confused could you get?

Because then you wouldn't/have/a/choice.

If God knows what a man will choose, then there is no will to interfere with.

Oh. So your answer is "yes"? My bad.

The question was: Do I have a choice? Your answer is no.

We'll take that as a "no."

Darwinists will do anything to avoid answering the question.

Darwinists will do anything to avoid the question.

Of course. A simple thought experiment exposes the mutual exclusivity. God tells me exactly what I will post. Can I do otherwise?

Darwinists will do anything to avoid answering the question.

If my thought experiment is intact, it shows mutual exclusivity. Your additions are, to be blunt, a distraction.

I disagree. If everything is known, we have no choice about what we will do. Exhaustive foreknowledge and human wills are mutually exclusive. My ice cream thought experiment shows this.

Darwinists will do anything to avoid the question.

But you won't answer the question. Telling.

Reported.

Yeah, I get you. I just don't see any need.

HERETIC! Burn him at the stake!!!!111

That would be adding to the scenario. Sure, we know that for those who love God, they will tend to act in a manner that they think would please Him. People who hate Him might be even more predictable. However, in the general scenario, the choice is always up to the man.

For example, a determinist is presented with the following: God puts vanilla and chocolate ice cream in front of a man and tells him that he will choose chocolate. Can the man choose vanilla? The determinist will do anything but answer the question.