Search results

That's enough. It could be a pink blunderbuss, if any part of it "collapses" or folds ---- evil.

A simple yes or no will suffice. You've misread the topic of the thread. This isn't about salvation, this is about communion.

He said she said. Good thing that's not the claim in the OP then. It's that the Protestant view of the communion bread and cup was logically positively proven to be false. That leaves only the Orthodox and the yes Catholic view still standing, which means you have two options if you want to...

Red herring fallacy.

Do you believe in the Real Presence of Him in the Eucharist? Still isn't relevant. There's precisely one valid way to be a Christian /Church pastor, and it's to be made one /appointed by an already valid pastor, the most recent link in an ancient chain that reaches back through time all the...

I believe it as it is explained in the Catechism. Which means, ironically, no. Edit: Also, what does this have to do with the OP or thread?

If there are any users who don't want to read the OP's linked thread, from post 115-217 (just skip past all the filler posts made by @God's Truth lol), here's a write-up that addresses the matter in an essay format instead, but most people aren't persuaded by such writing. Note that it's from...

Nope. Your view, which is the same view as all Protestants, and the same view of all atheists too, was crushed in the impromptu battle royale debate in the OP's linked thread. (@SaulToPaul was there promoting your view. He had no answer to @brewmama, who 'cleaned up'. It began post 115 and...

That's awesome. I was just thinking that your post is consistent with someone who didn't actually read the debate in the OP's linked thread. Because the whole "figurative language" lie was dispatched there.

That's awesome. The Protestant position on the Real Presence has been utterly denied, that the bread and the cup are only symbols. This view has been logically dispatched, in the OP's linked thread. The rhetoric however lives on, in the minds of Protestants (who hold the identical view on the...

A simple explanation of this unfamiliar acronym will enable me to provide you a simple yes or no. Thanks.

That's hilarious! lol! Of course! Like all the many passages that declare the altar bread and wine of the Church to be the body and blood of Christ! And like all of the other many passages which make zero sense unless the Eucharist is the Real Presence of Christ!

I don't enjoy how you never engage this OP. The debate is over. The Protestant view on communion is dead. And the Protestant view is your view, whether you want to face the reality that you are a Protestant. Or not. See OP.

You're continuing on as if your view (same as csuguy's view!) still has any logical chance of being true. It does not. DOA. RIP Protestantism. Long live the Real Presence of Christ in the Eucharist!

The Bible contains the primary evidence consistent with the Real Presence of Christ in the Eucharist. Christ's own words! And Paul's. All that's left is the evidence that the earliest Church believed in the Real Presence of Christ in the Eucharist, which was set out in the OP's linked thread...

Your position was defeated in the OP's linked thread. It was over by post 217. The Real Presence of Christ in the Eucharist is true. And still your view is dead on arrival.

Nope. Truth is confirmed by evidence. Evidence is always consistent with truth, and evidence is never inconsistent with truth. Evidence never conflicts with truth. I never said or implied such a thing.

csuguy argued the exact same belief as you and as every Protestant believes about the Real Presence of Christ in the Eucharist. iow csuguy argued your position. And lost! As the linked thread therefore shows, then you're only left with: Holy Orthodoxy. No other option.

MOSTLY PEACEFUL.

'S nothing wrong with gun-toting.