Search results

Paul talks about the "unsolicited" in Romans 2.

You don't need politicians to run a country. Democracy is one of the tools of Marxism. Democracy is mob rule, slightly slowed. A republic is a democracy, slightly slowed. In them, "politics" and "politicians" are used as perjoratives.

I don't agree with everything the woman being interviewed says, but I think she gives a good answer regarding the reason God doesn't intervene:

Truck drivers have some pretty crazy theology sometimes... I speak from experience! ;D

I asked ChatGPT to summarize the article (I have a subscription to the NYT, but I won't post the article itself due to it being paid content) and this is what it said (do note that the author of the article is very clearly an "Opinion Columnist" who very clearly supports the "trans movement")...

https://rsr.org/neandertal

Saying it doesn't make it so. No one has said otherwise. If the text says one thing, and this secret "cryptic secret" says another, then one is true, and the other is false. The Bible is true, at face value. Therefore your "secret message" is false, because your "secret message" says...

The passage limits the scope of "all things" to what is defined in context. To try to argue that it means anything more than that is to go beyond what the text says. Thank you for conceding the entire discussion, and for admitting Let's stick to what Scripture says. Not what we want it to...

The problem is that, as with any language, including ancient Hebrew and KOINE Greek, any given word has a sphere of meaning. It cannot mean something that it does not mean. When strung together to form sentences, those sentences can only be translated a limited number of ways. And when...

I won't deny the possibility of some demonic activity. But I think what Bob Enyart always said holds more water than demonic activity: Stupid doesn't make you sin, but sin makes you stupid. And these people are sinners wallowing in their sin, in need of a Savior but rejecting Him.

Oh, and this is called "begging the question."

False. There is no passage in scripture, nor collection of passages as a whole, that communicates to us that God knows literally everything. In order to arrive at that conclusion, you must intentionally read "omniscience" into the text. Right, because what we're caveating is a pagan concept...

The definition of a miracle (from Oxford Languages, through a quick Google search): "a surprising and welcome event that is not explicable by natural or scientific laws and is therefore considered to be the work of a divine agency." In other words, you will never understand through the study...

We agree on this. No, sorry, what's good for the goose is good for the gander. You can't just apply your reasoning to one passage and not another. If the context is what tells us what "all things" is referring to in one passage, then the context is what tells us what "all things" refers to...

I was mostly referring to the rank and file leftists. They simply don't have the brain capacity for it. The elite, however, are dangerously smart.

Original sin is false because of what the Bible says. Go read Ezekiel 18. Yes, the whole chapter. It puts the entire idea of "original sin" to rest, PERMANENTLY.

Answered by others here, but quite frankly, it's not what someONE determines, but what is allowed by the context. This is simply false. The Bible was written in such a way that it is extremely hard to mistranslate it. It was written as a story, a narrative that follows God and His chosen...