Search results

Proverbs are proverbs. Don't read them woodenly literally.

Opinion, dismissed. Whatever that's supposed to mean. Of course you don't want to go there, because it contradicts your beloved position. You're not willing to be malleable, Lon. All I have is your word on that. And I presume you know what the Bible says about one man's testimony...

Irrelevant. Genetic fallacy. It doesn't matter who said it. It's irrational. It was anything BUT accurate! You are stupid, and so are your arguments. Irrational, even. This coming from the same person who said "saying it DOES make it so." You are irrational, Lon. Your posts are the...

Then He is not capable of love, for love must be freely given. Says that God loved the world. That doesn't answer my question of if He could choose not to love. You're answering "did He?" I'm asking "could He not?" Completely different question. That's all well and good, but doesn't...

Please read it again. Preferably until you have it memorized. "Space" doesn't exist ontologically. ---- Yes. Repeating yourself won't magically make your claim come true. Supra, previous post. Settle on what? Truth? Not what the verse says. Greek: panta di autou egeneto kai choris...

They tell us that Jesus is God, the Logos, the second person of the Triune Godhead. Yes. Yes. Yes. NO! Jesus was born with a HUMAN nature, not a sin nature! He was fully man because He became one, Doug! Are you @keypurr, Doug? There is no fourth person of the Trinity, Doug. John 1...

@Lon Ping You haven't responded to this post yet. You need to. Repeating your position doesn't magically make it come true, Lon. Infinite means what it means. It does not mean whatever you want it to mean. But you refuse to let truth persuade you. Quantum physics? You're getting your...

Yes, He was. You're the totally ridiculous one here. You're going against Scripture at this point, with Jesus Himself, specifically: And now, O Father, glorify Me together with Yourself, with the glory which I had with You before the world was...

Harvard (or Stanford, for that matter) is not the bastion of Christianity you seem to think it is, Lon. Claiming "Harvard disagrees with you" doesn't address what Clete said, since they have adopted the very thing which Clete was talking about: Harvard falls into the category of those "who...

Then Jesus called a little child to Him, set him in the midst of them, and said, “Assuredly, I say to you, unless you are converted and become as little children, you will by no means enter the kingdom of heaven. Therefore whoever humbles himself as this little child is the greatest in the...

Fallacy: appeal to authority. Harvard can be (and on this, likely IS) wrong. Though I speak with the tongues of men and of angels, but have not love, I have become sounding brass or a clanging cymbal. And though I have the gift of prophecy, and understand all mysteries and all knowledge...

Do you happen to remember the argument? I'd like to hear it,

It's the same word G1722 in both 1 Corinthians 12:13 and in Matthew 3:11.

Ping @Lon

The Anglican church has been post-Christian for a loooooong time.

I had posted a couple of links to a few of your TOL posts on this topic in it, so it was probably auto-rejected or awaiting approval. I can't find it in my own comment history, unfortunately, so I'm guessing the former. https://youtube.com/@JudgeRightly

Curious to know your thoughts on this: My comment under the video: Open this link in a browser, as I'm pretty sure direct links to comments don't work in the mobile app. And I asked ChatGPT a few questions, seeing if what you and I believe ties into what Joel Korytko says...

First of all, if you're going to respond to someone, please use the "+QUOTE" or "Reply" button at the bottom of the post you wish to respond to. Second of all, why are you addressing this to me? None of this addresses anything I said, which wasn't much at all.

Link to the full playlist: https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLipp11LQP_zFPWbodNqsE6wnNdx66Q6nE