Search results

You're still not seeing it. Take a step back. Take a few, even,

@Lon Regarding Isaiah 40-48... (particularly 41:21-24, which is what you were trying to reference...) :

Isaiah 46 only has 13 verses.

FALSE. Jesus is the Logos. The Logos (Jesus) became flesh (human) and tabernacled (or "tented") among us. In other words, He put on a fleshy tabernacle called the human body and then lived in that body among humans. The body is just flesh. It's not another person.

So on the one hand, you say God knows the past present and future simultaneously. And on the other hand you say that nothing is really a necessary part of His existence. Is His simultaneous knowledge of the past, present, and future, not a necessary part of His existence?

So man is a necessary part of His existence?

So God from eternity past knew what it was like to be a man? Or did He gain that knowledge at the incarnation?

Acts a transition book. Without it, without the transition from "Gospel" to "Pauline Epistle," from New Covenant to Dispensation of Grace, Paul's writings would seem to not have any place in the Bible. In other words, the only reason Paul's writings fit in the Bible is because of the book of...

Even if that were true, and it's not, it doesn't change the fact that there are other paradigms of belief that do not require either Calvinism's doctrines of election or for universalism to be true. In other words, what you're presenting is a false dichotomy. What the Bible teaches is that...

| V

You don't seem to have understood what I said. An argument from repitition is where you repeatedly say something as though it will convince the one you are speaking to that it is true. In other words, just because you say something repeatedly, doesn't magically make it true. You can claim...

Argument from repetition is a logical fallacy for a reason.

"Why do when?" Because now. "You can don't" I can?

Do you need me or @Sherman to reset your password on your original account?

Since being introduced to Bob's ministry in 2015, I came to believe that anyone who dies before reaching the age of accountability, whatever age that is, they would be allowed to live in heaven until they reached that age, free from the flesh and demonic influence. I'd argue that the ratio of...

Not even close! I was simply wondering why Crede was responding to a post directed at Bladerunner. And then Bladerunner, seeing my mention of him, seems to think I was asking him something. Just pay attention people! It's not hard! I promise!