Search results

And for collecting harmful ones too: https://www.theblaze.com/news/children-face-masks-dangerous-pathogens

Question for you, @beloved57 : In the following verse, who is Jesus speaking to, and what were they chosen for? You did not choose Me, but I chose you and appointed you that you should go and bear fruit, and that your fruit should remain, that whatever you ask the Father in My name He may...

Removed UN for derailment.

God, not man, is 100% responsible for salvation. Man, not God, is 100% responsible for accepting the gift of salvation offered by God. God did not decide man's choices for him, but decided that man would have the ability and freedom to make his own choices.

... Vs. a Child Killer: Denver Bible Church pastor Bob Enyart defends Colorados abolitionist personhood Amendment 48 vs. Planned Parenthood associate Crystal Clinkenbeard. For more, please see https://kgov.com/abortion.

UN, what's your point? The fact of the matter is that Jesus says to judge, and with righteous judgment. I'm going to listen to Him.

So are the unelect.

Refer to Post #19.

Again: "Dead" does not mean incapable of responding. It means separated from God. That's how. He is correct. Chapter verse. Because there is no verse that says that man by nature does not have ears to hear. Chapter verse. Neither is it what I'm talking about. So why bring it up? Duh...

Christ died for the ungodly, Romans 5:6. Last I checked, that was all humans prior to their salvation. Christ died for all. But salvation is not automatically applied to all. It is only applied to those who are "in Him." Yes, as I said, Salvation is only applied to those "in Him." Paul uses...

Are you not able to answer his question?

Once again, taking scripture out of context. Now I, Paul, myself am pleading with you by the meekness and gentleness of Christ—who in presence am lowly among you, but being absent am bold toward you. 2 But I beg you that when I am present I may not be bold with that confidence by which I intend...

It makes no difference that you have scripture to back up what you're saying, B57. The problem is that you're reading what you believe INTO scripture, when the scripture, even though when you read it the way you want it to be read says exactly what you want it to say, DOES NOT ACTUALLY SAY that...

It's called confirmation bias. It's called eisegesis. NEITHER are good ways to study scripture. You should let scripture speak for itself, not read your beliefs into it.

Post #12, my first post in this thread. You ignored it. Post #17 was pointing out that you could not answer marke's Post #14, because you gave a generic answer that uses lots of words, but says very little. Post #19 both challenged your premise, and even answer your question, though...

You should read the verses just prior to the passage you quote. Because the context doesn't let the passage you quoted use it in the way you're trying to use it. Jesus says to judge. Paul says to judge. In fact, just read the verses just following that passage, 1 Corinthians 6:2-5.

That's called Eisegesis, and confirmation bias. You should be doing the opposite, and letting scripture define your beliefs, not looking for scriptures that support your beliefs.

Then you're going to have to show me the difference, because otherwise you're wasting my time, which makes you a hypocrite for not wanting me to waste yours. But that's not what I've been doing, for the most part. Sure, one or two points here and there, I simply dismiss. But the majority of...

Why should I readdress something that I literally just got done addressing, B57? Don't believe I did? Go back and read through my responses to you.