Search results

The "Mid-Acts" moniker applies mainly because of how one answers one single question. That question is, "When did the modern church age begin?" If you believe that the Body of Christ and Israel are two different bodies of believers with differing practices, rituals and requirements then it is...

So, I will take this post as proof that you literally have nothing but your claims to offer, that you really do expect us to accept your claims on the merit of your having shown up here to make them and that you haven't the faintest idea how to establish anything biblically, (if you even know...

Those orchids (yes plural) are clearly not naturally occurring and your rock formations only look vaguely like elephants from a specific angle and only because our brains are designed to recognize familiar shapes and faces (the whitish rock doesn't look to me like anything at all other than a...

If you can refute a syllable of it, I'd hear it gladly.

No!

Quite so! Therein lies another proof that blackSand is wrong that hadn't thought of until you posted this. It's summed up in one passage in Collosians... Collosians 2:13 And you, being dead in your trespasses and the uncircumcision of your flesh, He has made alive together with Him, having...

As a general rule, I'd say that this a healthy attitude to have but there are things that we can know as absolute facts. Well, not really. The things that the followers of Christ didn't understand had been intentionally hidden. They weren't supposed to have figured it out. If has been made...

Simply repeating your position does exactly nothing to establish it as true. I have already pointed out multiple passages that demonstrate that you are wrong. You respond to those by making the same claim again! Prove it, blackSand! Spend more than two minutes writing a post and make the...

So it's God's fault that you believe that He is unjust?! I don't know why this should surprise me! Of course that's what Calvinists would believe, just as they must also believe that it's God's fault that I not only believe what I believe but say what I say and that I win every debate I ever...

This is why the two have to go together. It is sound reason AND the plain reading of scripture. The point is simply that the bible trumps doctrine, not the other way around. Figurative language and symbols are used throughout the scripture but an acknowledgment of that obvious fact does not...

I will not read or respond to anything you have to say until you prove your claims. In fact, if you do not directly and substantively establish your claims in your very next post on this thread, I will simply put you on ignore and not waste any more time with you. PROVE biblically that, "Guilt...

Wow! Thank you glorydaz!

The concept you need to look further into is referred to as "first principles". The fact is that what you've said here is mostly correct except that those who do theology properly don't permit this situation to persist all the way down to their most foundational presuppositions. In other words...

Because there is a difference between legal guilt and moral guilt. Read Leviticus chapter 4.

Saying it doesn't make it so, blackSand! Prove it. You will not even try! You're a fool! Because it isn't relevant. If you think otherwise then explain why and if it turns out to be then we can discuss it. In the mean time no one is interested in your leading questions. You are such an...

More than that, she's lying. She doesn't even know what any of those things are! She doesn't know what she's talking about with dispensationalism either and she knows that everyone here can tell! She's grasping at straws trying to justify her exit in her own mind.

This makes no sense. The antibodies are the proteins that your body produces to fight against the virus. The virus and the antibodies are NOT the same thing at all. They can test for the antibodies and a positive test for them would be proof positive that you had been exposed to the virus, but...

No, you're not! You couldn't care less! That's part of what makes you so annoying! Don't compound the error by lying about it. They ARE my arguments! All I did was quote them! They say what they say!

False. This is, at minimum a drastic over statement. Dispensationalism simply teaches that the previous dispensation was still in effect during the events and teachings that took place in those books and that this must be taken into account when reading them and attempting to apply them...

Says the fool who has nothing to contribute.