Search results

I wasn't trying to be particularly clever. I said it to make a point. Of course you do. If this were your real stance you would not be an atheist. Abiogenesis is only one of thousands of things in the natural world that simply cannot have been created by undirected, mindless, natural...

I couldn't ever muster the faith that it would require to be an atheist.

Give or take 100 years? That seem like a very strong assertion. Could you give the evidence for such a dating?

And some survived the flood as well. There's evidence, both biblical and secular, of creatures that lived along side humans but that "science" would have believe died out millions of years ago.

I do not believe that anything roamed the Earth hundreds of millions of years ago but certainly do not deny that dinosaurs existed.

The flaws in radiometric dating are beyond belief! Here's just a taste... Scientist Realizes Important Flaw in Radioactive Dating Excerpt... "As someone who has studied radioactivity in detail, I have always been a bit amused by the assertion that radioactive dating is a precise way to...

I don't understand why this is so difficult to get across... You are making a claim here. It isn't an argument, it's simply a claim. What I've presented isn't just a claim but an actual argument, and a quite formal one at that, which has very clearly stated premises and each step of which...

Saying it doesn't make it so, Derf. The plain reading of the bible, where you simply read the words on the page and take them to mean what they seem to mean lands you with the idea that if you add a spirit to a physical body you get someone who is physically alive and when one gives up their...

Was this intended to imply that Jesus, the one with a physical body, is the one who breathed life into Adam? Was this also intended to imply that the Holy Spirit is no more a real thing that you say our spirits are but was instead the wind that came out of Jesus' lungs? That's my line, Derf...

So, my comments about "spirit" and "breath" was me doing a bit of fishing. I suspected that you were one of those who somehow think that God has lungs with which physically breathed life into Adam. I still cannot figure out where this 'unconscious dormancy' definition of death is coming from but...

Close enough. Good bye.

A lot of "blah blah blah" and exactly nothing that refutes on single syllable of the actual argument.

I'll "paste at you" all I want! One person posts a link and you tell them not to post links but post the relevant information. Then you tell me not to post the relevant information! Information, by the way, that is DIRECTLY relevant and responsive the "argument" that you previously claimed...

A rose, by any other name, is still a rose. Right? Since we are talking about what it means to die, I think this, more or less semantic point, only serves to muddy the water but it is true that He whom we call Jesus was not always a man but became a man at the incarnation. The point is...

Umm, did you mean you have scientific theories? This might be the case for many Christians but I can assure you that it isn't the case with most any young earth creationist on this website. Quite the contrary in fact. Group think is about as far from what we do as it can get. As it turns out...

That's stupidity! By what rational process would you come to the conclusion that rational absurdity as a concept is subjective? That question answers itself. Do you understand the point? This is idiotic, drooling mouthed stupidity! Not even worth responding to directly. Trying reading a...

Which of the two, the rich man or Lazarus, wasn't dead?

No. I grant you no unearned ground. Establish that such a change is warranted by something other than your desire to move it or else it's just fantacy land, pretend theology where anything goes so long as we like it.

Saying it doesn't make it so. Saying it doesn't make it so... Unless you're the bible! Then... Genesis 3:1 Now the serpent was more cunning than any beast of the field which the Lord God had made. And he said to the woman, “Has God indeed said, ‘You shall not eat of every tree of the...

Yes, I understood the point when you first mentioned it. Every Greek scholar that has ever translated the bible seems to disagree with your desire to put the comma after 'today'. You're going to have to do more than give me a doctrinal reason to think that you're right and all the bible...