Search results

Let me color code that verse to see what goes with what. Romans 11:7 What then? Israel [as a whole] hath not obtained that which he seeketh for; but the election [the remnant] hath obtained it, and the rest [all but the remnant] were blinded Only a portion of Israel was blinded, the believing...

@Sherman I noticed that in the Religion Forum that the "like" button shows up in Exclusively Christian section but it doesn't show up in MidActs or OpenTheism sections.

Ahhhh, I'm probably just not explaining it very well. They do when you're making brownies. haha! But yeah, work is earning a wage/reward owed to you and grace is not. Apples and oranges. This verse is talking about Jews, not Gentiles. It is about a remnant of believers of Israel, just as was...

ROFL! I had almost forgotten about that painting of Bill Clinton in Epstein's house.

And more about this area ...... It is interesting is that the one tribe that abandoned GOD's allotment of land to them is missing from the list of the 144,000 saints of the tribes of Israel that are sealed in the book of Revelation. Revelation 7 ESV (4) And I heard the number of the sealed...

More about the area ....... Mount Hermon has an ancient sinister history of the fallen gods, called Watchers in the book of Enoch. It was at this place that the fallen angels (the Watchers) made their pact to take the human daughters of mankind as wives and bear children (the nephilim) with...

The Gates of Hell This may throw a different spin on the meaning of what Christ said when we know how the ancient Jews would have understood it to mean according to history. Matthew 16 ESV (13) Now when Jesus came into the district of Caesarea Philippi, he asked his disciples, “Who do...

Not the letter of the law, but what the law revealed. The law revealed that, because of a spotless one, you would receive a pardon (that you didn't earn) instead of the guilty verdict you deserved (that you did earn). That's grace. The works of the law (ie. the ritualistic deeds that were done)...

The law itself taught grace through faith. It was the law that told of a spotless one that would be put to death so men could live. Anytime one brought a sacrifice they received grace by being forgiven and cleansed. And it was the law that taught that the just shall live by faith. I don't think...

Yes. If they were preaching another gospel of Christ than what Paul was preaching then Paul says it should be accursed. So, were they preaching another gospel of Christ than what Paul was preaching? I would have to answer "no" because I find it difficult that their preaching should be accursed.

Would make an excellent poster for support of Home Schooling.

I remember it well. A lot of us saw it coming. Because both of their mottos are: It's not perversion, it's "love".

Who is the owner now?

Thanks for that!

Yeppers. I would think it made David's butt clench to be commanded to cast a stone at one that did the same as he did. Gives another perspective to "Let him who is without sin cast the first stone". Who could actually be worthy to stone another for murder or adultery since all have sinned and...

Galatians 1 ESV (8) But even if we or an angel from heaven should preach to you a gospel contrary to the one we preached to you, let him be accursed. Did Peter, John, and James preach another gospel? If so, they should be accursed for it.

Yep. And if it had not been for the death and resurrection of Christ, he would still be captive to the grave.

It must have been gut-wrenching for David to watch others being put to death for murder and adultery per the law, knowing that he was as guilty as they.

I'm talking about those "unintentional" sins you say the sacrifices were for. Why was there a sacrifice commanded for them if faith and belief were enough to cover them?