Search results

Not quite. Eyewitness testimony is just one kind of witness (evidence). Jesus required "two or three witnesses," not "two or three eyewitnesses."

He went into some detail in his debate with Matt Slick. https://www.youtube.com/live/JCNPmLIOnDg?feature=share&t=12:50 https://kgov.com/amber-a-necessary-being-for-god-to-be-god

I use used water bottles. And they don't go behind the seat. Roads are too rough for anything open.

Cognitive dissonance.

Because He did. I'm the one agreeing with Scripture. You're not. No, her race is "human." It was a derogatory term for "Gentile." Gentile is not a race. And you do? The Bible says God does not know the future. You say He does. Who's right, you or the Bible? Straw man. What I can...

Says the one man giving his biased opinion that has no foundation in actual fact... That's rich, coming from you! Something you lack. Indeed. So what makes you think you're being intellectually honest? If you had a known atheist and a known Christian put in the room with you, and you...

No one should be voting on law, least of all Christians. And "conscience" isn't a good standard. That's what God's word is for.

Politicians are, generally speaking, not on God's side. But that doesn't mean that Christians shouldn't be involved in politics. We as Christians should stand for what is right. And to that extent, We as Christians should promote those things. AGREED!

Because God cares about how authorities treat their subjects. Does He not say in His word that those who are in a position of authority shall be held accountable for their actions regarding their subordinates? Does He not say in His word that authorities are His ministers? And? Again.... And?

Yes. He made an exception because of her great faith. God had a plan. He was following that plan. That plan did not involve the Gentiles at that point in time. Why is that so hard for you to understand? You're trying to trap me into saying God is a racist. It's not going to happen...

By then, it will be too late for you, Hoping. Repent! Which doesn't mean it won't happen. Wrong. That's law, Hoping. "If you do not resist, God will not save you." But that's not what God tells us about His people, Hoping! Therefore, having been justified by faith, we have peace with...

He literally quoted the verses for you. Try reading the posts people make before you respond to them. Otherwise you'll miss stuff. You seem to have a bad habit of doing that.

You'd think if there were people controlling the weather or climate, they'd make things easier for themselves and just get rid of all the supposed carbon in the air, instead of making a big fuss about it and demanding businesses to go green. Not only that, but they'd do something about the heat.

Those hotels are going to be destroyed by this. Both physically, and as businesses. Also, yay, higher taxes!

Why is this in Politics? Moved.

Elderly abuse!

I didn't say you did. I said that anarchy is a leftist ideal, just as totalitarian governments are a leftist ideal, because both are opposite of God's standards, which is that a king should rule. The "far right" is on the left. The true far right tries to conform to God's standards. Both...

That's just your subjective opinion. Nope. Right, so what? God is the objective standard. That by definition puts Him on the right. Everything else is left of Him. So conforming to God's rules for humanity is a "trite and biased parameter"? Yes, I was pointing out the irony of YOUR post.

https://x.com/WallStreetSilv/status/1705854583489044640?t=ys4j8j1ajmMZr1GtBCul0w&s=09

Because of objective standards. Saying it doesn't make it so.