No sir! It is not your audience's responsibility to not be confused by your sloppy use of language but rather your responsibility to communicate your message in a manner than can be received by your audience.
You can use whatever terminology you desire but if people are confused by your stubborn use of confusing language then that's on you, not them.
No, that would be what is called a tautology. This is no more meaningful than say that the lights aren't shining because they have no power. Well, no duh, Captain obvious!
Again, this is a tautology. Darkness is the absence of light. No kidding!
Heresy!
Neither of them lost their soul. What are you even talking about? They are their soul. You are your soul. Your soul is that part of you that is eternal and will never cease to exist. When your soul (i.e. YOU) are separated from your physical body then you have physically died. When you are separated from God (who is Life (capital L)) you are spiritually dead.
It is almost perfectly translated! It states precisely what the King James and nearly every English language translation says. Not only that but we have it in both Greek and Hebrew because it is the first verse of Psalms 22 which also, very clearly says in Hebrew....
Hebrew (Psalm 22:1)
Hebrew Text:
This is a very direct and emotionally raw expression. The Hebrew verb
azavtani (עזבתני) comes from
azav, meaning to abandon, forsake, or leave.
Greek (Matthew 27:46, transliterated Aramaic)
The Gospel of
Mark renders it slightly differently:
This reflects a more Galilean pronunciation (
Eloi instead of
Eli).
"Sabachthani" is the Aramaic equivalent of the Hebrew
azavtani, meaning "You have forsaken me."
Accuracy of Translation
- The Greek New Testament preserves the Aramaic cry that Jesus likely spoke aloud, which powerfully links back to Psalm 22 in Hebrew.
- The English translation matches very well: “My God, My God, why have You forsaken Me?” is a faithful rendering of both the Hebrew and the Aramaic-Greek.
In short, don't say things off the top of your head about things you know nothing about. You aren't talking to idiots who don't have the time to spend the 30 seconds it takes to look it up and find out that your making things up as you go.
No viable reason? It only bought our salvation, that's all! Jesus endured the separation we deserved so we wouldn’t have to. He was as dead as any man, for three full days, and He spent that time in the place of the righteous dead; the place He Himself called Paradise and what Scripture elsewhere calls "Abraham’s Bosom".
That’s not a minor footnote. That’s the Gospel itself, Oatmeal!
Not in regard to our salvation.
Lordship salvation is the belief that true faith in Christ must include a willingness to submit to His authority as Lord, not just trust Him as Savior. In other words, its a doctrine that says you have to stop sinning and start doing good deeds. It's the gospel of circumcision mix with the gospel of uncircumcision (See Galatians 2:6-9).
This seems weirdly stated as though the image of the lamb was primary.
Jesus wasn't taking the place of an animal sacrifice, the animals sacrifices were done in place of Christ. Jesus died, Oatmeal. He was dead. Dead for three full days. It wasn't an act where God was just going through the motions of some sort of divine ritual. It was as real as it gets.
You cannot be saved unless you acknowledge that God exist.
That is not stated in Romans 9.
Nor is it stated that you must acknowledge the need for being saved in the first place, which means that you acknowledge that you've sinned against God and deserve to be judged and punished.
All of which PRESUPPOSES other core doctrines. Doctrines that are implied without being stated outright (which is what it means to presuppose something).
No one, and I mean not one single living human being understood that this is what God was saying at the time, nor did anyone understand that it what was being intimated even after Moses wrote those words.
In other words, no one was saved by faith in Christ until AFTER Christ died on the cross.
I don't have time to teach you the entire New Testament, Oatmeal.
We cannot lose our salvation and so your last point doesn't hold water. You're conflating the body of Christ with Israel. We are not Israel. We are not saved by the same gospel that saved Peter, James and John and their converts.
Ever wonder why all the proof texts for one side of this debate are all written by Paul and all the proof texts for the other side of the debate are written by Peter, James and John (and the gospels)? If you think that's a coincidence, you're quite wrong.
The same is true for a whole list of debated doctrines...
- Can you lose your salvation?
- Must we tithe?
- Should we follow the Ten Commandments?
- Is water baptism required for salvation?
- Are we saved by grace alone or are good works required?
- Should we observe the Sabbath(s)?
- Should Christian expect to experience physical miracles?
- Etc.
All of these debates and perhaps several others have the Apostle Paul are the dividing boundary between the two sides. Again, see Galatians 2:6-9
This is called rationalization. The passage is teaching that you can lose your salvation. The key is not to force it to say something other than that but to understand that you're reading someone else's mail. You are not a Hebrew and even if you were one ethnically, you wouldn't be one spiritually because Israel's covenant was cut off (See Romans 9 and Jeremiah 18) and God turned instead to the Gentiles through Paul. Now there is no Jew or Gentile. There was but there is no longer and the author of Hebrews was writing to members of believing Israel (a.k.a. believing Hebrews) and was speaking in the context of their covenant with God, which required continued obedience to the law.
This is Lordship salvation doctrine and will only succeed in hobbling your spiritual walk. You cannot be better than you are because you are perfect in Him. Trying harder to not sin is to feed the very thing that produces the sin, namely your flesh. To be disappointed in yourself is to have trusted in your flesh. You are santified by the exact same thing that saved you. As you were saved, so walk! (Colossians 2:6).
Trust and obey, the performance-based way,
To exhaust every effort, yet still go astray.
No sir! It is not your audience's responsibility to not be confused by your sloppy use of language but rather your responsibility to communicate your message in a manner than can be received by your audience.
You are right! If the audience does not comprehend words like "work" then it should be explained to them. Work refers to putting energy and effort into something. For instance, a student who wants to do well in a class will have to put in mental effort, ie, work, to learn the material and make it make sense and practical for himself so as to benefit from the material and education being provided to the student. Mental effort takes work. It may not take as many calories as preparing a plot of land for a future garden or building a house, but even mental exertion is work.
From a physics point of view, (if I remember correctly), moving an object is horizontally is not work, ( unless there is friction to overcome) work in physics refers to moving an object against resistance. usually referred to lifting an object to a greater height.
If you and I spend a morning working on some project and you state you had breakfast 5 hours ago and you are hungry and I say I will buy you lunch but you refuse to receive the food, let alone lift it to your mouth to chew and swallow it, you will not receive the gift of lunch.
Proverbs 19:15
Slothfulness casteth into a deep sleep; and an idle soul shall suffer hunger.
Proverbs 19:24
A slothful man hideth his hand in his bosom, and will not so much as bring it to his mouth again.
Proverbs 21:25
The desire of the slothful killeth him; for his hands refuse to labour.
Proverbs 22:13
The slothful man saith, There is a lion without, I shall be slain in the streets.
Proverbs 24:30
I went by the field of the slothful, and by the vineyard of the man void of understanding;
Proverbs 26:13
The slothful man saith, There is a lion in the way; a lion is in the streets.
Proverbs 26:14
As the door turneth upon his hinges, so doth the slothful upon his bed.
Proverbs 26:15
The slothful hideth his hand in his bosom; it grieveth him to bring it again to his mouth.
Ecclesiastes 10:18
By much slothfulness the building decayeth; and through idleness of the hands the house droppeth through.
Matthew 25:26
His lord answered and said unto him, Thou wicked and slothful servant, thou knewest that I reap where I sowed not, and gather where I have not strawed:
Romans 12:11
Not slothful in business; fervent in spirit; serving the Lord;
Hebrews 6:12
That ye be not slothful, but followers of them who through faith and patience inherit the promises.
If someone purchases a new vehicle for you, but you are not willing to sign the title or reach out to accept the keys to the vehicle, it will not be yours because you are not wiling to do the work to receive the gift. It does not matter how much it cost, it does not matter what the price was paid, it is your slothfulness, you lack of effort, work, that prevents you from receiving that gift.
It takes work to receive and learn and to get knowledge and wisdom and understanding. No one can force you to receive those things, no one can force you to do the work to receive those things. Regardless of the pricelessness of those things, with out your work to receive them, you gain nothing.
Regardless of the work, the price that Jesus Christ paid to make redemption and salvation available to everyone, you unwillingness to do the work to receive it is not the givers problem, it is the problem of the givee, I know new word, but it makes sense.
Although I have shared these concepts before, evidently, you are not familiar with the idea that it to receive even a gift takes work.
Hopefully, this above will clear up this issue for you.
No, that would be what is called a tautology. This is no more meaningful than say that the lights aren't shining because they have no power. Well, no duh, Captain obvious!
If you are dead, you are not alive. Well, since the audience evidently cannot distinguish between life and dead, I had do explain it to him.
There is not consciousness in death. The mind is dead the body is dead, there is no life.
Psalm 6:5
5 For in death there is no remembrance of thee: in the grave who shall give thee thanks?
Ecclesiastes 9:4-6
4 For to him that is joined to all the living there is hope: for a living dog is better than a dead lion.
5 For the living know that they shall die: but the dead know not any thing, neither have they any more a reward; for the memory of them is forgotten.
6 Also their love, and their hatred, and their envy, is now perished; neither have they any more a portion for ever in any thing that is done under the sun.
They have no more memory because death eliminates the capacity to have thoughts and memories
The reason God had to raise Jesus Christ from the dead is because there is no functioning in death. His body would have corrupted back to ashes and dust
Acts 2:27 Because thou wilt not leave my soul in hell, neither wilt thou suffer thine Holy One to see corruption.
Jesus Christ would have become dust as all dead bodies tend to do
Dust does not have the capacity thing and remember
Genesis 2:7
And the Lord God formed man of the dust of the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and man became a living soul.
Genesis 3:19
In the sweat of thy face shalt thou eat bread, till thou return unto the ground; for out of it wast thou taken: for dust thou art, and unto dust shalt thou return.
Job 10:9
Remember, I beseech thee, that thou hast made me as the clay; and wilt thou bring me into dust again?
Job 10:9
Remember, I beseech thee, that thou hast made me as the clay; and wilt thou bring me into dust again?
Again, this is a tautology. Darkness is the absence of light. No kidding! No sir! It is not your audience's responsibility to not be confused by your sloppy use of language but rather your responsibility to communicate your message in a manner than can be received by your audience.
Remember, you told me that I have to explain things to my audience, lest they become confused. God forbid that I should not distinguish between the living and the dead for you.
Heresy!
Neither of them lost their soul. What are you even talking about? They are their soul. You are your soul. Your soul is that part of you that is eternal and will never cease to exist. When your soul (i.e. YOU) are separated from your physical body then you have physically died. When you are separated from God (who is Life (capital L)) you are spiritually dead.
Whoa! Where does scripture teach that soul is eternal and will never cease to exist?
Adam and Eve died on that very day because they both lost the spirit which is the image of God, that God created for them.
When you lose that spirit from God, you have lost a very precious thing.
Psalm 51:11
Cast me not away from thy presence; and take not thy holy spirit from me.
The believer is composed of three parts, namely, spirit and soul and body, as is taught in
1 Thessalonians 5:23
And the very God of peace sanctify you wholly; and I pray God your whole spirit and soul and body be preserved blameless unto the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ.
Spirit is one aspect of the image of God.
John 4:24
God is a Spirit: and they that worship him must worship him in spirit and in truth.
Without spirit, we cannot do what is commanded to us, that is, to worship him in spirit and in truth, or figuratively, truly via the spirit
Animals have soul.
Genesis 1:21
And God created great whales, and every living creature that moveth, which the waters brought forth abundantly, after their kind, and every winged fowl after his kind: and God saw that it was good.
The word for living is the Hebrew word chai or alive, living. The Hebrew word for creature is the nephesh, which means soul. Since animals have soul are you suggesting that animals have eternal life?
The souls of Adam and Eve did die eventually, that is why they are dead. Their soul died.
Why bother say "living creature" if all soul is eternal? That would be redundant. There a live soul and there are dead souls.
Why bother with the gift of eternal life, if you already have eternal soul, eternal life?
Romans 6:23 For the wages of sin is death; but the gift of God is eternal life through Jesus Christ our Lord.
God's word is consistent and reliable
It is almost perfectly translated! It states precisely what the King James and nearly every English language translation says. Not only that but we have it in both Greek and Hebrew because it is the first verse of Psalms 22 which also, very clearly says in Hebrew....
Well, that is your opinion. Yeah, most of them got it wrong.
Matthew 27:46
And about the ninth hour Jesus cried with a loud voice, saying, Eli, Eli, lama sabachthani? that is to say, My God, my God, why hast thou forsaken me?
Why are those Aramaic words in the KJV English? That is very odd. Were they not competent to know for sure how to translate those words? Like most people, it is traditional and politically correct to disparage God and Jesus Christ and there inseparable relationship.
Inseparable relationship, you ask?
Yes, their relationship was inseparable as Jesus stated in
John16:32
Behold, the hour cometh, yea, is now come, that ye shall be scattered, every man to his own, and shall leave me alone: and yet I am not alone, because the Father is with me.
Jesus said, everyone would leave him alone, yet he is not alone, because the Father is with him.
So you say that he didn't really mean that? That Jesus lied?
Which is it?
a. The Father was with him
b. The Father is not with him.
John 16:32 makes it unmistakably clear.
The Father is with him.
How close were they?
John 10:30
I and my Father are one.
You cannot get much closer and tighter than being one with the Father.
How can "one" be separated?
That is one state of relationship for Christians to aim for and maintain.
Where was God in relationship with Christ? God was in Christ, while he was reconciling the world unto himself. Was Jesus Christ reconciling the world when he was on the cross? Yes, he was.
II Corinthians 5:19a
To wit, that God was in Christ, reconciling the world unto himself...
God was in Christ while the world was being reconciled to him.
How can one be separated?
The fulness of God was in Christ.
Colossians 2:9
For in him dwelleth all the fulness of the Godhead bodily.
Which is it?
a. The fulness of God was in Christ
b. The fulness of God was not in Christ.
Colossians 2:9 makes it clear.
The fulness of God dwells in Christ
How tight was this relationship that Jesus Christ had with his Father?
Matthew 26:53
Thinkest thou that I cannot now pray to my Father, and he shall presently give me more than twelve legions of angels?
It takes a tight relationship with God his Father to be able to be given more than 12 legions of angels at his request.
Did not Jesus Christ always do the Father's will? Why would God forsake someone who always does the Father's will?
I do not always do the Father's will, yet God promises to never leave me nor forsake me. Why would God forsake his only begotten son?
Hebrews 13:5
Let your conversation be without covetousness; and be content with such things as ye have: for he hath said, I will never leave thee, nor forsake thee.
So how did they let such a blatant error in? An error that would claim that God forsook Jesus Christ? A translation that contradicts a host of scripture?
How do you explain that?