Derf
Well-known member
I don’t have to. Your article does it. For example, “In a brief order, the justices said Texas did not have legal standing to bring the case.”Tell us all, exactly why have Republican-appointed judges dismissed charges of fraud in the 2020 election?
Fact check: Courts have dismissed multiple lawsuits of alleged electoral fraud presented by Trump campaign
Following President Joe Biden’s swearing in on Jan. 20, a Facebook post shared over 6,140 times has said: “Not one court has looked at the evidence and said that Biden legally won. Not one”. This is false: state and federal judges dismissed more than 50 lawsuits presented by then President...www.reuters.com
But in saying that, the article refutes its own title, since the reason given is dismissal for lack of standing. Which says NOTHING about the validity of the evidence. The article also refuted you, since you were using it to say there was no evidence.
Since you posted the article, that means you are refuting yourself.
Thank you. This post is now way to long to just say that I agree with you here.