YouTube censorship
- Thread starter Tambora
- Start date
ok doser
lifeguard at the cement pond
So I was looking around for a video game review with background graphics on YouTube and inadvertently found a tie-in to the sad OP video and F-bomb dropping whiner who was complaining because his videos were ending up on the restricted list. I remember him mentioning, incredulously, a game reviewer or something to that effect, named PewDiePie also being on that list.
So I found a review by PDP and started to watch it. Literally around two minutes in, while reacting (not really reviewing) a video game he launches an F-bomb. Yeah, I think I'm starting to get a handle on some of the "censorship" that's going on with YouTube.
ummm
maybe you should take a look at some of the "black lives matters" stuff on youtube
or just about any rap
:yawn:So I was looking around for a video game review with background graphics on YouTube and inadvertently found a tie-in to the sad OP video and F-bomb dropping whiner who was complaining because his videos were ending up on the restricted list. I remember him mentioning, incredulously, a game reviewer or something to that effect, named PewDiePie also being on that list.
So I found a review by PDP and started to watch it. Literally around two minutes in, while reacting (not really reviewing) a video game he launches an F-bomb. Yeah, I think I'm starting to get a handle on some of the "censorship" that's going on with YouTube.
Sent from my SM-G9250 using TOL mobile app
See, I didn't say boo to Stripe, though I did note something about the OP directly, the thing he's been complaining about for the need for...nearly fifty posts without mostly talking on the point and there he is, a half step away from being Sod lite with a nothing yawn to add and an apparent need to either add it because I wrote something or because he has an even sadder obsession with owning a last word in relation...and, of course, there's the once respectable Tam breathlessly wrapping her atta-boy around it.
For anyone happening by who can keep their conduct on the level of a high school grad or better, the OP has a guy whining about censorship and noting his videos have been put on a restricted list. Then he drops an F-bomb and gives an insight into why that might be and have nothing to do with his politics. He also mentions another "victim" of YouTube, a guy who reviews video games at least part of the time. I saw one. Two minutes in and he dropped an F-bomb.
Good grief.
lain:I can find pirated movies on YouTube, but that doesn't excuse you or anyone else who gets caught doing it. And absent a serious study and correlation of data a suspicion and anecdote isn't proof or a conclusion.
You're so far behind the conversation. The swearing has been shown to be utterly irrelevant as the content is being targeted.See, I didn't say boo to Stripe, though I did note something about the OP directly, the thing he's been complaining about for the need for...nearly fifty posts without mostly talking on the point and there he is, a half step away from being Sod lite with a nothing yawn to add and an apparent need to either add it because I wrote something or because he has an even sadder obsession with owning a last word in relation...and, of course, there's the once respectable Tam breathlessly wrapping her atta-boy around it.
For anyone happening by who can keep their conduct on the level of a high school grad or better, the OP has a guy whining about censorship and noting his videos have been put on a restricted list. Then he drops an F-bomb and gives an insight into why that might be and have nothing to do with his politics. He also mentions another "victim" of YouTube, a guy who reviews video games at least part of the time. I saw one. Two minutes in and he dropped an F-bomb.
Good grief.
I can find pirated movies on YouTube, but that doesn't excuse you or anyone else who gets caught doing it. And absent a serious study and correlation of data a suspicion and anecdote isn't proof or a conclusion.
Sent from my SM-G9250 using TOL mobile app
I don't care. Sort of like you when you use a yawn instead of actually saying something.
It's not irrelevant. If you break the rules that can get you put in a box you have no complaint about being put in a box. Clean it up and then get put in a box and it's meaningful.
Because it bears repeating:
For anyone happening by, the OP has a guy whining about censorship and noting his videos have been put on a restricted list. Then he drops an F-bomb and gives an insight into why that might be and have nothing to do with his politics. He also mentions another "victim" of YouTube, a guy who reviews video games at least part of the time. I saw one. Two minutes in and he dropped an F-bomb.
ok doser
lifeguard at the cement pond
yeah, but that's not what's happening
hence my reference to "acceptable" forms of profanity by the likes of BLM and rap "artists"
the point of which went whoooosh right over your head
Because you want something to talk about?
The video I provided is FCC compliant and restricted, while mainstream stuff from the other side is all swear words and not restricted.
Because it bears repeating:
:yawn:
Sent from my SM-G9250 using TOL mobile app
It was happening in the OP video and it was with the first video I came across by accident with the other guy he noted.
I know because I listened to both of them. They have no complaint. Maybe someone else does, if the data supports it.
You have data, a serious study on the point? That would have been a better move as OPs go.
It must be hard going through life having to look up to see most people. I guess it did something to you that you can't undo.
This isn't about me. Except, apparently, to you and Sod and Tam.
You acting like a child bears repeating? Well...okay.
lain:Because it actually bears repeating:
For anyone happening by, the OP has a guy whining about censorship and noting his videos have been put on a restricted list. Then he drops an F-bomb and gives an insight into why that might be and have nothing to do with his politics. He also mentions another "victim" of YouTube, a guy who reviews video games at least part of the time. I saw one. Two minutes in and he dropped an F-bomb.
Anyone doing that doesn't have a horse in the mistreated horse race.
ok doser
lifeguard at the cement pond
| go to youtube type the f-word in the search bar
|
he wasn't banned for using profanity
You mean put on a restricted list? Well, if that's true he should be. And so should the guy in the OP and the other guy he spoke about. So they got two right and one wrong. Okay. How many posts on YouTube and what's the mechanism? Is it complaints? Maybe the people who listen to that guy know what to expect. Maybe someone like me, maybe a kid looking for a game tip wasn't and said something. Maybe all sorts of things.
The rest is data. Real data, not suspicion, not anecdote. You get that and I'm in, I'm interested. You don't have it and it's just a conspiracy theory.
ok doser
lifeguard at the cement pond
so your whole purpose for stomping around here for 28 pages is to insist there's no real data to support the OP?
and when you're presented with real data, you waffle and cry "conspiracy"?
:darwinsm:
Which I haven't done.
What I actually wrote:
I'll give you that anecdotes are data, but they require serious analysis and confirmation to establish a rule.
Which I didn't do, supra.
ok doser
lifeguard at the cement pond
the best kind of data is that which you can verify for yourself :thumb:
| go to youtube type the f-word in the search bar |
when i did this, the result i got was:
| About 22,600,000 results |
what do you get?
You seem singularly disinterested in a sensible discussion, yet you keep posting. :idunno:
Because it actually bears repeating:
Your objection has been addressed. YouTubers who are FCC compliant are put out, while mainstream ones on the other side are not.
Feel free to actually get on topic.
Don't even bother conceding that your objection had been addressed before you raised it. :up:
You watched two videos and ignored the conversation. It is way past where you are trying to drag it.
Sent from my SM-G9250 using TOL mobile app
You're like a guy who keeps asking me for the time then suggests I have a watch fetish.
lain:I must have missed the post to the study and data supporting that. Where was it again?
If you're the topic police you should book yourself, Danno.
Was it? I didn't see it. Good of you to bring it up right off the bat like you didn't.
I started to watch the OP video and then stopped because the guy dropped an F bomb and my kid was in the room. Given at that point I could understand his being on a restricted list it lost the romance of an argument of parts for me...then I happened (in an unrelated moment) across a video by another guy the first guy mentioned as being unfairly restricted and two minutes in he dropped an F bomb.
Seemed like a pattern developing. But it could just be an ungodly coincidence. Those happen.
That's the thing about words, they can't really drag you anywhere you don't want to go. So unless someone had a compulsive disorder they would be home free at any point.
Last edited:
Yep.
You don't seem to want to.
And ruled yourself out of the conversation. Since then you've ignored the discussion and pushed anything that serves your agenda. Whatever that is.
On numerous occasions I have pointed out issues that are on topic and directly counter your inaccurate portrayal of matters. You post a wall of text and pages later complain that you can't remember what I said.
Seemed like a pattern developing, but it could just be an ungodly coincidence. Those happen.
Sent from my SM-G9250 using TOL mobile app
If you look for a thing hard enough you're bound to see it. Sometimes even when it isn't there.
Only if I ruled you in as the arbiter of anything, which I haven't. The conversation with Yor didn't take any surprising turns, but that's life.
The first clue that I'm not pushing an agenda should occur to you when you can't name it.
Quote yourself doing that during our actual conversation.
Quote that one too. It sounds interesting.
The parrot thing still isn't really much of anything.