ok doser
lifeguard at the cement pond
I said
you see there it is. Men would not have tried to twist that around.
in what way is that twisted around?
I said
you see there it is. Men would not have tried to twist that around.
in what way is that twisted around?
I said
I didn't mean that.
I saiddid you mean that a woman's logic is not flawless?
I said
Did you say that you was NOT a woman?
See what I mean here? You should have said, "Did you say that you weren't a woman?" Only an uneducated person, and many hicks say, "Did you say that you was NOT a woman?". This is a small issue, yet it tells that the real issue is language skill, not the sex of the speaker, rather the degree of education. You are most familiar with hicks, and therefor, wrongfully perceive a code of gender ethics', which is biased out of ignorance. This bias has vanished in the last fifty years and it does not mean all these changes are directly linked to a rise of secularism.
Some changes are caused by secularist ideals, but not all the lifting of unnatural restaurant, which was a culturally based bias.
In other words, one does not have to be a backwards hick who believes in the 'rule of thumb' as heaven sent to be a believer.
If you were better educated, you might have a better understanding of what God wants you to know. Attempting to debase women is not part of what God wishes you to know. This is your own simple minded bigotry.I said
I'm not the one that made it about women, God is. And I'm sure He had His reasons.
Now as far as education, its not all its cracked up to be.
Really. And what would that certain style of logic be?I said
Women have a certain style of logic.
If you were better educated, you might have a better understanding of what God wants you to know. Attempting to debase women is not part of what God wishes you to know. This is your own simple minded bigotry.
You should try to learn, and not teach because you are not well equipped to teach anything regarding theology, the subject is beyond you. Find a good minister.
Really. And what would that certain style of logic be?
You think only women speak from emotions? You think that only men have "crucified the flesh with its passions and desires"? Show me where that only applies to women or you're going beyond what is written.I said
women speak from their emotions. Nobody should speak from their emotions. They shouldn't speak about the things of God until they have crucified all their emotions. Nobody belongs to Christ until AFTER they have crucified their emotions.
Gal 5:24-25
24 And those who are Christ's have crucified the flesh with its passions and desires.
25 If we live in the Spirit, let us also walk in the Spirit.
(NKJ)
You think only women speak from emotions? You think that only men have "crucified the flesh with its passions and desires"? Show me where that only applies to women or you're going beyond what is written.
Squeaky said:I said
women speak from their emotions
You said women speak from their emotions. So men speak from their emotions? Have you changed your mind now and include men?I said
I did.
Nobody should speak from their emotions. They shouldn't speak about the things of God until they have crucified all their emotions
You said women speak from their emotions. So men speak from their emotions? Have you changed your mind now and include men?
I've read your threads and posts and many of them reflect your view of women so don't act like you don't know what I'm talking about. You do know.I said
You ask me about women. I added the men myself. You just couldn't see it. Are you bitter towards men?
I've read your threads and posts and many of them reflect your view of women so don't act like you don't know what I'm talking about. You do know.
No, I am not bitter towards men. Why, because I believe those scriptures apply to both men and women?
You have an issue with women. That is evident.
Originally Posted by ok doser said:perhaps he's found his way without you trying to "help" him.
Squeaky said:I said
After seeing your logic I just have to ask. Are you a woman?
You are just opening up 5 or 6 threads at onceI'm sorry but isn't that a little to sensual. All I done was ask a question.