nypost.com
They lose 2 cents per case... but they'll make it up in volume.View attachment 7064
Bud Light mocked for $20 rebate on $19.98 case of beer: ‘They’re giving it away’
“Things can’t be going great if they’re basically giving it away…” one Twitter user observed.
Yes I saw that one. What kind of an idiot thought that was a good idea for Major League baseball?
Not an idiot, probably a Head Chef troll like @Hoping here. Predictably, Catholics get butt-hurt, which opens up the floodgates of reminding the Church of all the child raping felons who infiltrated her pastoral ranks for decades on end, plus the also predictable fumbling of all the non-child-rapist bishops who just weren't prepared for dealing with such rank violent crime.
Money, money, money, money.
I believe the perception of priests molesting grade-school children was crafted to protect liberal journalists. Never heard that one before have you?
The fruit betrays the seed. (1 John 3:9-10)
I have heard that theory before, here. It doesn't pass muster though, because doesn't a 13- or 14- or 15-year old have a right against a grown man----especially a grown man in some sort of authority over the teenager, such as a step-father or uncle or their church's priest or pastor----propositioning them for sex? Of course they do. Whenever a grown man propositions a youth for sex, he has committed a first degree rights violation imo, and is also thereby a violent criminal. People who commit rights violations against children, even if they do it gently, are violent criminals. Because their victims are children! Minors, below the age of consent or reason or some other measure of mental maturity. They have rights, and certainly one of those rights is against being propositioned for sex by grownups.
I don't disagree with anything you said except I don’t recall the media doing a very good job of clarifying the victims age accurately. If you ask the average person how old they think the average victim of a pedophile priest was at the time of the molestation, most people will say 9 or 10.
They weren't all homosexual offenses though Jefferson. I know those were the vast majority, but there were exceptions. The common denominator is therefore violent criminal rights violating rapists, and not homosexual or heterosexual or pansexual or whatever other sexual proclivity. It was the rape that was common to them all. These criminals targeted minors and ignored rights. And they got into the Church's ministerial priesthood, and they also got into marrying divorced mothers so they could rape her children, and they got into raping their nieces and nephews and they got into babysitting so they could rape kids that way. They're rapists, and they target kids. Scum of the Earth.
I don't doubt that some of them were pedophiles but the vast majority of them were either ephebophiles (attracted to high-school students) or hemophiles (attracted to junior high school students). I'm sure at least one of those priests was attracted to only males between roughly 16 to 20 years old. We're clearly talking about a homosexual in this case. And when some woke journalist reported on the case, do you think that journalist accurately described the priest as a homosexual?
And I don't doubt that Democratic party operatives who write journalism obfuscate the clear facts in these cases as well. They report the victims are males and the criminals are priests but they don't put two and two together and say this was homosexual rape.
And, as usual with the KJV, that's mistranslated.
Similarly ... very similarly, they'll never report as headline news when a Black man is the shooter in one of the hundreds of mass shootings which occur in America every year. Actually come to think of it, it's really that, you're not going to get your mass shooting as a headline news story unless you're not Black, and if you're suicidal. If you're Black and not suicidal, then you have zero chance----no one is ever going to hear about you and your mass shooting (which happened in Chicago or in Baltimore or in Washington DC or in St. Louis, etc.). Only non-Black, suicidal mass shooters get their name in lights here. Totally racist. Typical Democrats.
