SaulToPaul 2
Well-known member
There is no other meaning to Jesus is the Christ than that he sacrificed for sins.
Totally made up.
There is no other meaning to Jesus is the Christ than that he sacrificed for sins.
Totally made up.
d'ism by definition means there are 2 peoples and programs. Otherwise it would be in agreement with Gal 3 etc. It is not.
We are on the same team, Dan.
The Kingdom program had Jews and some Gentiles. The Body program has Gentiles and some Jews.
IP does not know what he's saying.
d'ism by definition means there are 2 peoples and programs. Otherwise it would be in agreement with Gal 3 etc. It is not.
d'ism by definition means there are 2 peoples and programs. Otherwise it would be in agreement with Gal 3 etc. It is not.
d'ism by definition means there are 2 peoples and programs. Otherwise it would be in agreement with Gal 3 etc. It is not.
We are on the same team, Dan.
The Kingdom program had Jews and some Gentiles. The Body program has Gentiles and some Jews.
IP does not know what he's saying.
Hi and you will not say that Israel has been set aside , when you all see that the Law of Moses is being FAZED OUT ?
You can not debunk the OP , can you ?
dan p
Hi arguments are all an ILLUSION and will never explain how a person under a 1P 1P can be saved NOR explain where he will go when He dies , SADDDDDDDDD !!
dan p
It does not submit to the NT because it is an 'expert' on it.
The NT does not pit the kingdom against the body. That is the illusion and myth of D'ism. It does not submit to the NT because it is an 'expert' on it.
Hi and are you saying that The KINGDOM of HEAVEN is the same as the B O C , so , produce that verse ??
dan p
Only anti-dispensational ignoramus' would want to put two things together that God has NOT YET put together. Eph 1:10There are a cluster of expressions that were about the new community that was forming. Only D'ism with its 2 programs WANTS to find ways to fracture, compartmentalize these things and they are not supposed to be. It is supposed to end up like Eph 4:3-6. There is one unified community even though there are gifts for helping it function that are very different, as different as men and women.
There are a cluster of expressions that were about the new community that was forming. Only D'ism with its 2 programs WANTS to find ways to fracture, compartmentalize these things and they are not supposed to be. It is supposed to end up like Eph 4:3-6. There is one unified community even though there are gifts for helping it function that are very different, as different as men and women.
Blending is wrong, for the sake of blending.There are a cluster of expressions that were about the new community that was forming. Only D'ism with its 2 programs WANTS to find ways to fracture, compartmentalize these things and they are not supposed to be. It is supposed to end up like Eph 4:3-6. There is one unified community even though there are gifts for helping it function that are very different, as different as men and women.
Only anti-dispensational ignoramus' would want to put two things together that God has NOT YET put together. Eph 1:10
Your "understanding" of "NT doctrine" is quite simply garbage.That's just silly. God does not expect us now to unify heaven and earth. he expects us to be unified on earth. D'ism finds every thing it can to fracture and compartmentalize NT doctrine. As you can see down in v21, things are unified in Christ this way "not only in the present age but also in the age to come." 1:10 is not an automatic D'ist meaning, which is totally foreign to the NT. The NT always has the unresolved tension between proclaiming that Christ is now Lord and the fact that the world is in darkness. It is never one or the other. It is always both. It simply says in v19 that the POWER that resurrected Christ is at work now everywhere, but of course there is still opposition.
Your making "fulfilled in Christ" mean whatever you want will not fool those that understand what ALL of scripture it teaching.Btw, since RD always has so much trouble with the expression 'in Christ,' he might be interested to know it is here 8x in the 1st 14 verses--since RD is the expert on these verses. To say the OT hope is fulfilled 'in Christ' is saying it is fulfilled in the same thing.
:thumb:Your "understanding" of "NT doctrine" is quite simply garbage.
Your completely nonsensical "if it's not repeated, it's cancelled" doctrine has led you to shear stupidity.
Your making "fulfilled in Christ" mean whatever you want will not fool those that understand what ALL of scripture it teaching.
God promised Israel that they would have a King to sit on a throne in Jerusalem. Your fairy story will not change that.
That's just silly. God does not expect us now to unify heaven and earth. he expects us to be unified on earth. D'ism finds every thing it can to fracture and compartmentalize NT doctrine. As you can see down in v21, things are unified in Christ this way "not only in the present age but also in the age to come." 1:10 is not an automatic D'ist meaning, which is totally foreign to the NT. The NT always has the unresolved tension between proclaiming that Christ is now Lord and the fact that the world is in darkness. It is never one or the other. It is always both. It simply says in v19 that the POWER that resurrected Christ is at work now everywhere, but of course there is still opposition.
Btw, since RD always has so much trouble with the expression 'in Christ,' he might be interested to know it is here 8x in the 1st 14 verses--since RD is the expert on these verses. To say the OT hope is fulfilled 'in Christ' is saying it is fulfilled in the same thing.