But that's the only way as far as I am concerned.
Nope, that's not the only way.
It is hard not be one of majority but that's what it is if you are aiming to be perfect which that's what Jesus commands.
But that's the only way as far as I am concerned.
Thanks for the dose of some needed humility, meshak.Nope, that's not the only way.
It is hard not be one of majority but that's what it is if you are aiming to be perfect which that's what Jesus commands.
are you saying He didn't build His church?
Thanks for the dose of some needed humility, meshak.
What I probably meant to say is that so far it is the only way for me. It's the only way *I* have now to make some common sense of the Christian tradition.
I already responded about it.
Don't harp on to me like you always do.
I want to be kind and respectful to all those in the world. By doing that it is my belief that this activity is helping to discover and carry out Jesus' Kingdom of God.So you want to please the world, not God nor Jesus.
Jesus says if you are friend of the world, love of the Father is not in you.
I want to be kind and respectful to all those in the world. By doing that it is my belief that this activity is helping to discover and carry out Jesus' Kingdom of God.
What prevented you from reading my post you are replying to?You can be kind and love by spreading Jesus. Without Jesus we are meaningless.
What prevented you from reading my post you are replying to?
I specifically tried to indicate that I am trying to help God by helping Jesus bring the Kingdom of God down on earth--where God is the sovereign ruler.
Not Caesar, the Roman Empire or the American Empire.
I don't see Jesus' descriptions of the Kingdom of God as advocating that.You cannot make kingdom of God in this world. It will not happen until Jesus starts to reign.
You need to spread Jesus to the world so they can join in God's kingdom in second life.
Jesus--in my view--never saw himself as divine. There are too many discrepancies in the Bible that challenge that tradition.
I do affirm that he is Son of God, Savior, divine because I respond to the ways in which his contemporaries and later followers saw him.
I agree with them. But it is metaphoric and faith language. It is not factual description. It is "belief-based."
This is a grievous error that makes God to be impotent.
A regenerated person ("born again") cannot fall away, else that person was never regenerated by the power of the Spirit in the first place. Our Lord's high priestly prayer makes it clear that none that were given to Him by the Father will be lost to Him. If they are lost, they were not given in the first place. The indwelling of the Spirit in the believer is not keeping house with the devil for that divided house cannot stand. Those in Hell have no indwelt Spirit. So, per your notions, the Spirit was driven out of the one so "born again" now residing in Hell. Accordingly, losing the indwelt presence of the Spirit means that the forces of darkness were more powerful that the force of Light. May it never be!
Heb 6:4-5 For it is impossible for those who were once enlightened, and have tasted of the heavenly gift, and were made partakers of the Holy Spirit, And have tasted the good word of God, and the powers of the world to come, |
Heb 6:6 And having fallen away, |
Heb 6:6 to renew them again unto repentance; seeing they crucify to themselves the Son of God afresh, and put him to an open shame. For the earth which drinketh in the rain that cometh oft upon it, and bringeth forth herbs meet for them by whom it is dressed, receiveth blessing from God: But that which beareth thorns and briers is rejected, and is nigh unto cursing; whose end is to be burned. |
Or, one may think,
"I can lose my salvation, after all..."
"justification is a process”.
"I perform works to meet the requirements of this process”.
Therefore, I am saved…by my works.
Because the person's doctrine is faulty, his or her assurance has no firm basis.
Another way that people falsely assure themselves of salvation is by believing that they will get to heaven by trying to live a good life. Those who think they are living a good enough life to satisfy the demands of a holy God are only deluding themselves into thinking they are saved.
But what if a person has a sound doctrinal knowledge of salvation? Is it still possible to have false assurance? We must answer yes.
A person might think he has saving faith but not really possess it.
(Professing but not possessing.)
The test for authentic assurance is twofold.
On the one hand, we must examine our own hearts to see if we have true faith in Christ.
We must see whether or not we have any genuine love for the Biblical Christ.
For we know such love for Him would be impossible without regeneration.
Second, we must examine the fruit of our faith. We do not need perfect fruit to have assurance, but there must be some evidence of the fruit of obedience for our profession of faith to be credible. If no fruit is present, then no faith is present, for that very fruit is wrought by God and He is not a God who fails. Accordingly, where saving faith is found, fruit of that faith is also always found. We must also understand that not all trees bear the same amount of good fruit, but they do in fact bear good fruit. We get into trouble by becoming "fruit inspectors" and measuring one's fruit against another, forgetting the teachings of Scripture concerning the rewards in heaven based upon our walk of faith on earth. Everyone's cup in heaven is full, it's just that some cups are larger than others'.
Finally, we seek our assurance from the Word of God through which the Holy Spirit bears witness to our spirit that we are His children.
Fruit inspectors indeed! The simple fact is that we are not equipped to self-examine our own fruit...
I enrich my faith by separating Jesus from Christ.I am not a trinity believer.
So what is your point?
...
And where in the Bible does it say we are to assure ourselves of our Salvation? Paul got a thorn in the flesh, and subjugated his body under him, and not as some sissie shadow boxer merely beating the air either, and was this to assure himself he was saved? Or was it, as he reported, in order that he not be lost, having instructed others?
Arsenios
I take from your post you disagree with the perseverance of the saints, holding instead one actually regenerated can become unregenerated.
Have I misread you?
Scripture offers up plenty of reason for assurance of the believer:
That we can be certain of our full assurance, without any sort of extraordinary revelation, is clear from Scripture. We need to trust God's word, not our fickle feelings, when He says "These things I have written to you who believe in the name of the Son of God, in order that you may know that you have eternal life." 1 John 5:13
It is through the Scripture that the Spirit bears witness to us that we are God's adopted children.
Hebrews 6:4-6:
Heb 6:4 For in the case of those who have once been enlightened and have tasted of the heavenly gift and have been made partakers of the Holy Spirit,
Heb 6:5 and have tasted the good word of God and the powers of the age to come,
Heb 6:6 and then have fallen away, it is impossible to renew them again to repentance, since they again crucify to themselves the Son of God and put Him to open shame.
In the entire epistle the author is admonishing the reader to accept the Gospel in faith and not fall into the sin of unbelief that will lead to judgment (see Hebrews 2:1-3; Hebrews 3:12-14; Hebrews 4:1, 6; 11; Hebrews 10:25, 27, 31; Hebrews 12:16-17, 25, 29).
Yet, in Hebrews 6:4-6 the recipients of the Epistle are not addressed. Rather a truth is stated emerging from an earlier reference to the Israelites falling in the desert because of unbelief. This truth applies also to the Hebrews, despite the author’s omitting personal reference in Hebrews 6:4-6.
Three points divide the text:
1. Who are the people mentioned? The people mentioned are characterized by four Greek participles displaying poetic rhythm—enlightened, tasted, partakers, tasted.
“those who have once been enlightened”
Here, and in Hebrews 10:32, “enlightened” means “knowledge of the truth” as in Hebrews 10:26. The verb is not related to baptism, but has a broader meaning as indicated by other usages in Luke 11:36; John 1:9; 1 Cor. 4:5; Ephesians 1:28, 39; 2 Timothy 1:10; Rev. 18:1; Rev. 21:23; Rev. 22:5. Yet nothing here means persons that have once been saved.
“{who} have tasted of the heavenly gift”
Attempts to limit this to mean those new converts that have attended worship, made professions of faith, celebrated the Lord’s Supper, etc., are viewing the passage too narrowly, for we find the broader explanation in the New Testament:
- Jesus calls Himself, “the gift of God” (John 4:10)
- Peter names the Spirit the gift of God (Acts 2:38; Acts 8:20; Acts 10:45; Acts 11:17)
- Paul mentions “the gift of grace”, “the gift of righteousness”, associating them with Christ (Romans 5:15; Romans 5:17, 2 Cor. 9:15; Ephesians 3:7; Ephesians 4:7).
“{who} partakers of the Holy Spirit”
The connection between the preceding clause above and this one is clear from the Greek. We may even see the link between the “laying on of hands” (Hebrews 6:2) and the sharing in the Holy Spirit, especially, from the above, if we understand the heavenly gift to be the Spirit. Sharing in the Spirit implies this is done in fellowship with other believers, with the Spirit manifested in various gifts given to the church members (1 Cor. 12:7-11). Many partake of the Spirit without being indwelt by the Spirit.
“{who} have tasted the good word of God”
No extent of the Word is specified, only that it is good. Men receive a good gift each time God speaks. Again the writer uses “tasted” to indicate enjoyment of receiving this gift. The enjoyment is the hearing of the proclamation of the Scriptures and in getting some sense of sustenance from that Word.
“the powers of the age to come”
Experiencing “the powers of the age to come” is from the continuation of tasting the Word of God. Note the use of the plural, “powersb don’t [state] what these powers are, for the author does not say, but we know they belong to the coming age, but they are also in evidence in this age (the apostles demonstrated some), and are intended to advance the church across the world.
The phrase, “the age to come” (or small variants) appears only six times in the NT, so we need to use some due care in interpreting it (see, Matthew 12:32; Mark 10:30; Luke 18:30; Ephesians 1:21; 2:7l Hebrews 6:5). In principle we are able to experience in this age the powers that belong to the future age (see TDNT, vol. 1, page 206). We will fully realize the supernatural powers we can now observe at the dawn of the coming age.
What we have so far is that a number of experiences some persons have had are described by the author. These experiences are not exclusive to the regenerated (saved) person. The author just lists these experiences, never clarifying who actually experiences them. But, he continues…
2. What happens to the people mentioned?
“and then have fallen away”
Hardened hearts spring from non-belief, and their disobedience caused the Israelites to fall in the desert. They fell from non-belief despite having even put blood on doorposts, saw the pillar of fire by night, eaten the Passover lamb, consecrated first born males, heard the voice of God, and tasted manna daily. They had tasted, been enlightened, shared in gifts of the Spirit, witnessed wonders, miracles and by their non-belief “then have fallen away”, these unbelievers have crossed beyond the point of return, “it is impossible to renew them again to repentance”
3. Why is this so?
“since they again crucify to themselves the Son of God and put Him to open shame.”
It is significant that in the enumeration of the divine gifts received by those who are conceived as afterwards falling away there is no one gift which passes out of the individual. All are gifts of power, of personal endowment. There is no gift of love one would expect to find if Hebrews 6:4-6 was addressing the believer. Under this aspect light falls upon the passage from Matt. 7:22 f.; 1 Cor. 13:1. In this connection it will be noticed that it was the presence of love among the Hebrews which inspired the Apostle with confidence (Heb. 6:10).
If the “losing one’s salvation” interpretation were true, however, the passage would also teach that, once lost, salvation could never be regained. But Christians are not being addressed, and it is the opportunity for receiving salvation, not salvation itself, that can be lost. The previous topics— intellectual enlightenment about God’s word, tasting God’s gifts and His Spirit, and so forth—accompany revelation, not salvation. They are meant, of course, to help lead to salvation, but they do not do so apart from faith in Jesus Christ.
In summary, nothing in this passage makes it apply explicitly to the believer. The passage is directly applicable to those with "temporary faith"- not true faith in Christ.
Temporary faith...
1. is enlightened, tasted the goodness of the word, from hearing the gospel message and knew the way to be saved, but rejects it as in (Matthew 13:20-21)
2. tasted the heavenly gift of Christ, but never received Him. Just as Christ tasted but did not eat or drink the wine mixed with gall (Matthew 27:34), we must eat and drink of Christ (John 6:53)
3. partakes of the Spirit, such as convicting (John 16:8), and being placed in positions of external privilege (1 Cor. 7:14)
4. tasted the powers of the age to come such as witnessing to miracles that foreshadowed the wonders of the coming kingdom of Christ
Having participated and experienced all of these things, yet still rejecting Christ, means no redemption is possible. One example, Judas, clearly fit each of the items described above.[/spoiler]
where is the originator of this thread RichRock?
++
I am not a trinity believer.
Banned.