Cruciform
New member
False Dilemma Fallacy.Jesus' words are life, not the catechism.
Already answered (Post #761).Tell me, how do you obey Jesus when he says call no man 'father'?
Gaudium de veritate,
Cruciform
+T+
False Dilemma Fallacy.Jesus' words are life, not the catechism.
Already answered (Post #761).Tell me, how do you obey Jesus when he says call no man 'father'?
False Dilemma Fallacy.
Already answered (Post #761).
I already said it. All you have to do is click on my cited sources.
If so, then Protestants constantly "practice words of men."If you do things that are NOT in the Bible---then you practice words of MEN.
Amen.Acts 5:29 Peter and the other apostles replied: "We must obey God rather than human beings!
Yes, Jesus condemned "the traditions of men." However, he certainly did not condemn Apostolic Tradition, which the apostles actually command believers to affirm and follow (1 Cor. 11:2; 2 Thess. 2:15). Thus, not all "tradition" in the Bible is condemned, but only that which originates with men apart from the authoritative teachings of Christ's one historic Church.Matthew 15:6-9 Thus you nullify the word of God for the sake of your tradition.
Mark 7:8-9, 13 You have let go of the commands of God and are holding on to the traditions of men.” And he said to them: “You have a fine way of setting aside the commands of God in order to observe your own traditions!
13 Thus you nullify the word of God by your tradition that you have handed down. And you do many things like that.”
You're assuming (wrongly) that all apostolic teaching is contained in the Bible. Go ahead and cite a text of Scripture which states any such thing.The apostles from the New Testament received all the truth we need to guide us to eternal life. All we need to guide us to eternal life is written down in the Scriptures
If you do not compare your personal opinions (interpretations) with the established teachings of Christ's one historic Church, how can you know with certainty that your proposed interpretations (opinions) are in fact correct?We do not need elected men to interpret God’s word for us...
I already said it. All you have to do is click on my cited sources.
Clearly, you have no idea what you're talking about.False Dilemma Fallacy.
Already did (Post #761).You cannot tell us how the Catholics obey. You would gladly tell us if they did.
If you were truly interested in an answer to your question, you would be eager to read any pertinent information made available to you. Therefore, your disingenuousness is here revealed.I am not clicking on your links.
What's the difference? Either way, the information is provided, and the question is answered. Why complain about the manner in which the information is provided?It would be nice to see you answer the question rather than direct to cited Catholic sources.
If you were truly interested in an answer to your question, you would be eager to read any pertinent information made available to you. Therefore, your disingenuousness is here revealed.
Post your proof.You expose yourself as being disingenuous.
If so, then Protestants constantly "practice words of men."
Amen.
Yes, Jesus condemned "the traditions of men." However, he certainly did not condemn Apostolic Tradition, which the apostles actually command believers to affirm and follow (1 Cor. 11:2; 2 Thess. 2:15). Thus, not all "tradition" in the Bible is condemned, but only that which originates with men apart from the authoritative teachings of Christ's one historic Church.
You're assuming (wrongly) that all apostolic teaching is contained in the Bible. Go ahead and cite a text of Scripture which states any such thing.
If you do not compare your personal opinions (interpretations) with the established teachings of Christ's one historic Church, how can you know with certainty that your proposed interpretations (opinions) are in fact correct?
Gaudium de veritate,
Cruciform
+T+
Post your proof.
Hardly. You demonstrated your own disingenuousness, which I simply observed in Post #787.You falsely accused me of being disingenuous.
Hardly. You demonstrated your own disingenuousness, which I simply observed in Post #787.
"...why we will not obey" your preferred (mis)application of the Bible, you mean. Big difference there.All you do is make excuses why you will NOT obey Jesus.
It is you we won't obey. That seems to be what's actually bothering you.Stop making excuses to not obey God.
I know nothing about you. My comments have simply evaluated your actions on this thread. The charge of disingenuousness describes your own posted statements.Let's discuss the scriptures. You are trying to make this thread about what you think of me personally.
"...why we will not obey" your preferred (mis)application of the Bible, you mean. Big difference there.
It is you we won't obey. That seems to be what's actually bothering you.
How, then, to explain the some 50,000+ man-made Protestant (non-Catholic) denominations and sects in existence to date, with more being invented every week---all based upon some man's preferred interpretations of the "clearly written" Bible?The Bible is clearly written!
How, then, to explain the some 50,000+ man-made Protestant (non-Catholic) denominations and sects in existence to date, with more being invented every week---all based upon some man's preferred interpretations of the "clearly written" Bible?
How, then, can you be certain that your preferred interpretations of the Bible are correct, rather than merely a case of you being "ensnared by Satan"?Satan ensnares people.
The Catholic religion has false doctrines just like all denominations.