Then why do you even bother using such facile descriptors for monogamy then? If you think loving monogamous couples are obsessive or possessive simply because they're committed to one another then that's all on you.
I didn't say I think that all loving monogamous couples are obsessive or possessive, but it clearly happens. I was describing the way you describe your values in monogamy and how it makes the institution sound.
Take it up with your husbands link. He espoused it as fact and it extended from a dominant patriarchy.
There can be more than one type of dominant patriarchy. In this case, the grammar for "dominant" is describing genetic dominance. Rock stars or men who invented better ways to rub sticks together for fire would experience the "I want that one" phenomena - girls wanting them over other options, even if they are already attached to a woman. Without polygamy, jealousy would put the dominant male's wife/children at risk from competition via other females, especially in a more brutal-social sort of caveman environment.
Considering neither you or he seem to consider it 'natural' for a woman to have multiple husbands then do the math...
Alpha males naturally wouldn't need or want to share females but not all human males are alphas. Likewise, some females, although more rare, are really ambitious and energetic vixens who could use a whole posse of beta/omega males.
Regardless of whether it's a female or male with many spouses, it's impossible to maintain a group marriage like that without major loyalty from all parties. It's too easy for a mate in that situation to get away if they are not the one tied down to multiple obligations. Polygamy creates a unique sort of vulnerability for the dominant player in the group-relationship (there will always be that leader in any relationship, be it male or female).
Cites? Otherwise that is nothing more than a soundbite in lieu of support.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3876290/
(see paragraph 7 of the introduction)
Oh, so a polygamous patriarchy is somehow less misogynist? Figures...
Depends. Patriarchy (either way) isn't necessarily misogynist. Only if it is abusive towards women. And our modern Western polygamy is actually less polygyny and more polyamory in philosophy, if you want to talk social trends.
Well, for a start, no straight person would want to be married to someone of the same gender so that's a given. Look, if you're happy enough sharing your husband with multiple wives then have at it. It's not for the vast majority of people and it ain't bigoted simply to point that out.
If that's all you are saying, you won't get a fight out of me. I don't care if 99% of people hitch the regular way, as long as they are fair and tolerant to the 1% who do things differently and like it that way.