Originally Posted by aCultureWarrior
Your view on adult-child rape sex was made loud and clear in your first post on the subject:
Originally Posted by Kit the Coyote
I would say it is a safe assumption that many if not most of the sexually active minors under the age of 14 are having sex with someone older than them. Another reason why sex education is important.
"...often abusive"? Meaning that sometimes adult-child sex isn't abusive? So when a 9 year old boy decides that he wants to be raped by a homosexual elder and later finds out that he enjoyed it, it wasn't abusive?
Homosexual/homosexual activist Peter Tatchell couldn't have said it better.
Originally Posted by aCultureWarrior
I'm only relaying what you've told about yourself Kit: That you have homosexual desires but have them under control because you are married to a woman and have fathered two sons with her. Or is there more to your story?
You're the one defending an unnatural and highly disease ridden behavior, not me.
I've acknowledged many times that you borrow off of Judeo-Christian doctrine when it comes to monogamy and marriage.
Boy, aren't you the moral pillar of society? Do you fantasize about sex with other men or just "find men sexually attractive"? You do realize that finding someone of the same sex "sexually attractive" is perverse don't you? Or maybe you just like to write your own moral code?
Thanks again for pointing out that you're borrowing off of Judeo-Christian doctrine. Now if you would only take that a step further and acknowledge that doctrine when it comes to homosexuality.
There's a huge difference between an EX homosexual who is trying to understand and overcome his or her same sex desires and someone who continues to have same sex desires and doesn't act on them out of fear of disease or (supposedly) in your case commitment to a spouse.
Originally Posted by aCultureWarrior
Then we shouldn't believe the testimonies of those who have failed at conversion/reparative therapy?
Back to testimonies by those who have been successful in controlling and in many cases overcoming their unwanted and extremely harmful desires/behaviors:
Should we not believe those that have overcome alcoholism, drug addiction, pornography addiction and addiction to cigarettes?
I'm glad that we both agree that society shouldn't believe in the testimony of those who have failed at conversion therapy.
How about EX homosexuals who after 10 years of believing that they have overcome their same sex desires still believe it? Should they be believed?
Don't those scientific studies require some sort of testimony from those that participated in them?
Next up: Great news from Mass Resistance regarding a failed conversion/reparative therapy ban!
Your view on adult-child rape sex was made loud and clear in your first post on the subject:
Originally Posted by Kit the Coyote
I would say it is a safe assumption that many if not most of the sexually active minors under the age of 14 are having sex with someone older than them. Another reason why sex education is important.
So teaching children the basics of sex which should include that adult/minor sexual relationships are often abusive and should be avoided is wrong? What a bizarre little world you live in.
"...often abusive"? Meaning that sometimes adult-child sex isn't abusive? So when a 9 year old boy decides that he wants to be raped by a homosexual elder and later finds out that he enjoyed it, it wasn't abusive?
Homosexual/homosexual activist Peter Tatchell couldn't have said it better.
Originally Posted by aCultureWarrior
I'm only relaying what you've told about yourself Kit: That you have homosexual desires but have them under control because you are married to a woman and have fathered two sons with her. Or is there more to your story?
You are just determined to illustrate your ignorance of Human sexuality
You're the one defending an unnatural and highly disease ridden behavior, not me.
...and relationships. You neglect to mention my position on monogamy and marriage.
I've acknowledged many times that you borrow off of Judeo-Christian doctrine when it comes to monogamy and marriage.
I find men and women sexually attractive, remember that B in LGBT you like to bring up, and I don't have to control that. I know that nothing will come of it because I am in a dedicated monogamous marriage and I know who is going to grace my bed each night.
Unlike your friend I can enjoy looking at a good looking man or woman on the street and don't have to play any mind games to avoid temptation. I know there are a lot of weak-willed people who have trouble with keeping marriage vows, I'm not one of them.
Boy, aren't you the moral pillar of society? Do you fantasize about sex with other men or just "find men sexually attractive"? You do realize that finding someone of the same sex "sexually attractive" is perverse don't you? Or maybe you just like to write your own moral code?
I have same-sex and opposite-sex attractions other than my wife but I choose not to act on them because of my vows to her.
Thanks again for pointing out that you're borrowing off of Judeo-Christian doctrine. Now if you would only take that a step further and acknowledge that doctrine when it comes to homosexuality.
Those attractions still exist though and many of your so-called Ex-gays who got married are likely just the same, Bi-sexuals who have decided to simply not act on of their other attractions.
There's a huge difference between an EX homosexual who is trying to understand and overcome his or her same sex desires and someone who continues to have same sex desires and doesn't act on them out of fear of disease or (supposedly) in your case commitment to a spouse.
Originally Posted by aCultureWarrior
Then we shouldn't believe the testimonies of those who have failed at conversion/reparative therapy?
Back to testimonies by those who have been successful in controlling and in many cases overcoming their unwanted and extremely harmful desires/behaviors:
Should we not believe those that have overcome alcoholism, drug addiction, pornography addiction and addiction to cigarettes?
A testimonial is a snapshot in time of what a person believed at that moment in time. It is not that hard to find testimonials of a person who believed a faith-healer cured them of cancer just to have died six months later from that cancer.
I'm glad that we both agree that society shouldn't believe in the testimony of those who have failed at conversion therapy.
How about EX homosexuals who after 10 years of believing that they have overcome their same sex desires still believe it? Should they be believed?
Testimonials are nice, scientificly conducted studies are better.
Don't those scientific studies require some sort of testimony from those that participated in them?
Next up: Great news from Mass Resistance regarding a failed conversion/reparative therapy ban!