Why Homosexuality MUST Be Recriminalized! Part 5

[aCultureWarrior]

Originally Posted by aCultureWarrior
I believe the rainbow flag waving Republicrats call that "damage control"...

You can make all the dumb jokes you want.

It's a term that's in the dictionary, something that White House Press Secretary Sarah Sanders-Hucksterbee (drop the hyphen Sarah and take your husband's name) does on an hourly basis for her flip flopping moral degenerate boss.

Owens' Hitler comment won't be going away, in fact I'm surprised that the Republicrat Party didn't drop her like a proverbial hot potato, like they did when their openly homosexual/homosexual activist Milo Yiannopoulos was caught on video talking about the joys of pedophilia.

WARNING! As with anything that comes out of the mouth of homosexuals, there is vulgarity in this video!

Spoiler

YOU are the one with a diseased obsession with homosexuals. Why is it any of your business if someone is a homosexual or not. Why don't you mind your own dumb business and quit bothering people. You are nothing but a hate-filled person, and when it comes to Owens you are a liar to boot.

On that note, I want to personally thank you for adding to the thread's post and view count, as amongst other things, it get's me that much closer to starting "Why Homosexuality MUST Be Recriminalized! Part 6".

 

[TrumpTrainCA]

Repeating

Speaking of Hitler, only another Hitler would throw homosexuals in jail simply because they are homosexuals. Maybe the OP wants to toss in the Jews and the Gypsies too.

 

[ok doser]

... if Adolf Hitler hadn't gone global and just stuck to ruling Germany, everything would have been fine.
...

that's an interesting consideration

do you think the US would have gone to war with Germany if Hitler had not invaded his neighbors?

 

[aCultureWarrior]

Repeating

Originally Posted by TrumpTrainCA
Speaking of Hitler, only another Hitler would throw homosexuals in jail simply because they are homosexuals...

Not to worry, Donald Trump won't be subjecting lost souls who have turned to sexual deviancy to the criminal justice system here in the US, nor if he has his way, anywhere in the world.

Quote by Candace Owens, Libertarian/defender of homosexuality/defender of Adolf Hitler:

... if Adolf Hitler hadn't gone global and just stuck to ruling Germany, everything would have been fine.

that's an interesting consideration

do you think the US would have gone to war with Germany if Hitler had not invaded his neighbors?

Candace Owens made that quote, you should ask her at your next Trump rally.

 

[aCultureWarrior]

Trump asked why George Washington didn’t name Mount Vernon after himself, report claims

President Trump wondered why George Washington did not name his estate Mount Vernon after himself, a new report claims.
Trump reportedly made the comment during a visit to the historic compound in April 2018, according to Politico. The president visited Mount Vernon in Virginia with first lady Melania Trump, French President Emmanuel Macron and his wife Brigitte Macron...

“If he was smart, he [Washington] would’ve put his name on it,” Trump quipped, according to sources. “You’ve got to put your name on stuff or no one remembers you.”

The report claims Trump was allegedly disinterested in the history of the first president during the 45-minute tour and described it to associates as “truly bizarre.” Bradburn reportedly said the Macrons were more knowledgeable about the estate than the commander-in-chief. A source told the media outlet Bradburn “was desperately trying to get [Trump] interested in" Mount Vernon.
A source alleged that Trump asked if Washington was "really rich." ...
Read more: https://www.foxnews.com/politics/donald-trump-george-washington-mount-vernon

Pssst, don't anyone tell Trump that George Washington turned down the offer to be King, as that will really make him go into a tizzy.

 

[aCultureWarrior]

In "Finally!" news:

Supreme Court revisits cakes and gay marriage

April 11, 2019

Wedding cakes and same-sex marriages are back before the Supreme Court, and this time the justices are being asked to rule broadly that the First Amendment’s protection of the “free exercise” of religion shields... Christians from state civil rights laws.

An Oregon couple who were fined $135,000 for refusing to make a cake for the marriage of two women have asked the justices to take their case. If the court does so, [it could] could significantly change the law on religious liberty and LGBTQ rights. The justices could announce as early as Monday whether they will hear the case.

For nearly three decades, the court has followed a rule set down in a 1990 decision written by a conservative hero, the late Justice Antonin Scalia. Rejecting a claim brought by Native Americans who ingested peyote as part of a religious ceremony, Scalia said that the Constitution’s guarantee of the free exercise of religion did not provide a shield against a “neutral and generally applicable law.” In the peyote case, two men had been fired for using an illegal drug.

...In the Oregon case, lawyers for Melissa and Aaron Klein said the couple were forced to shut down their Sweet Cakes store in the city of Gresham because of the conflict over their religious beliefs. They asked the court to overrule Scalia’s decision and declare that the Constitution does provide a religious exemption to Oregon’s civil rights law.
Oregon, like California and 20 other states and dozens of large cities, requires public businesses to provide “full and equal” service to all customers without regard to race, sex, religion or sexual orientation.
Read more: https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/s...s-and-gay-marriage/ar-BBVQl4L?ocid=spartanntp

How sad that a precedence has been established by SCOTUS on religious freedom because two American Indians wanted to get high off of peyote and said that they had a right to based on their [pagan] religion.

I'm curious what justification SCOTUS will use to deny hearing the case of Sweet Cakes case, and thus allow the 'gaystapo' to continue to steamroll their destruction throughout America.

 

[ok doser]

... if Adolf Hitler hadn't gone global and just stuck to ruling Germany, everything would have been fine.
...

that's an interesting consideration

do you think the US would have gone to war with Germany if Hitler had not invaded his neighbors?

...Candace Owens made that quote...

well, no - that was your paraphrase

and since you thought it important enough to raise the point, i'm not off-topic in pursuing it

i'll ask again:

Would the US have gone to war with Germany if Hitler hadn't invaded his neighbors?

i know the answer - i suspect you do too

 

[aCultureWarrior]

Originally Posted by aCultureWarrior
...Candace Owens made that quote...

well, no - that was your paraphrase

Here's Candace Owens' actual words:

"if Hitler just wanted to make Germany great and have things run well, okay fine."

and since you thought it important enough to raise the point,...

Yes, I think that whenever someone who claims to be a conservative representing a political party that claims to be conservative uses words like "make Germany great" and "okay fine" about sexual deviant/mass murderer Adolf Hitler it's very important to point out.

i'll ask again:

Would the US have gone to war with Germany if Hitler hadn't invaded his neighbors?

i know the answer - i suspect you do too

My answer is (drum roll....)

Not interested, as there are many things that are currently being discussed in this thread (the gaystapo Equality Act, SCOTUS hearing or not hearing the Sweet Cakes religious freedom case, etc. etc. etc.) and I'm not going to get the thread sidetracked on issues that aren't important to this thread.

 

[ok doser]

pressed on the point, aCW admits that what Candace Owens actually said was:

Here's Candace Owens' actual words:

"if Hitler just wanted to make Germany great and have things run well, okay fine."

see that pesky word "just" in there?

know what it means, in that context?

just adverb
\ ˈjəst
, ˈjist, ˈjest also without t\

Definition of just (Entry 2 of 3)

only, simply

used in a sentence: "If aCW was just interested in promoting his cause, he wouldn't be dishonest"

 

[aCultureWarrior]

pressed on the point, aCW admits that what Candace Owens actually said was:

Originally Posted by aCultureWarrior
Here's Candace Owens' actual words:

"if Hitler just wanted to make Germany great and have things run well, okay fine."

see that pesky word "just" in there?

know what it means, in that context?


used in a sentence: "If aCW was just interested in promoting his cause, he wouldn't be dishonest"

This is "just" my opinion, but I fail to see how any homosexual could make anything great, let alone how a mass murdering homosexual could make any country great.

Walk me through this, as I'm open for listening to further explanation as to what "greatness" is in your opinion.

 

[ok doser]

This is "just" my opinion, but I fail to see how any homosexual could make anything great, let alone how a mass murdering homosexual could make any country great.
Walk me through this, as I'm open for listening to further explanation as to what "greatness" is in your opinion.

oh, i see why you're mistaken

you thought Candace Owens was saying that a mass murdering homosexual could make a country great


because reasons :kookoo:

 

[aCultureWarrior]

Originally Posted by aCultureWarrior
This is "just" my opinion, but I fail to see how any homosexual could make anything great, let alone how a mass murdering homosexual could make any country great.
Walk me through this, as I'm open for listening to further explanation as to what "greatness" is in your opinion.

oh, i see why you're mistaken

you thought Candace Owens was saying that a mass murdering homosexual could make a country great


because reasons :kookoo:

I guess I missed your answer as to what greatness is in your opinion.

Aside from the fact that Adolf Hitler was what one German historian referred as a "nancy-boy" who later turned out to be a mass murderer, Hitler was also a socialist (hence the National Socialist German Workers Party).

I'm not aware of any "great" socialist countries, perhaps you could name a few?

 

[aCultureWarrior]

An excellent 3+ minute video explaining the grave danger of the 'Equality Act'.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=115&v=w3o41jYmD58

I see no way that SCOTUS could rule in favor of religious freedom which would conflict with Congress passing this anti-Christian legislation.

I'll keep close tabs on both.

 

[Stripe]

oh, i see why you're mistaken

you thought Candace Owens was saying that a mass murdering homosexual could make a country great


because reasons :kookoo:

:chuckle:

Does everyone have hearing impairment when that lady speaks?

In other news: It's still not OK to be gay.

 

[ok doser]

:chuckle:

Does everyone have hearing impairment when that lady speaks?

In other news: It's still not OK to be gay.

or a mass murderer :thumb:

 

[TrumpTrainCA]

......Here's Candace Owens' actual words:

"if Hitler just wanted to make Germany great and have things run well, okay fine.".....

Here is the Bible's actual words about God:

"He will cover you with his feathers, and under his wings you will find refuge"

So God has wings and feathers, right? Oh, or did I take that out of context.

You are a petty lying propagandist sir. Nothing more.

 

[TrumpTrainCA]

In other news: It's still not OK to be gay.

Its not okay to engage is sin. As far as just "being" something goes, we all suffer from a fallen nature. Your fallen nature is no better than a gay man's fallen nature.

 

[Stripe]

Your fallen nature is no better than a gay man's fallen nature.

Thanks for that, Captain Obvious.

 

[aCultureWarrior]

Originally Posted by Stripe
In other news: It's still not OK to be gay.

Its not okay to engage is [in] sin. As far as just "being" something goes, we all suffer from a fallen nature. Your fallen nature is no better than a gay man's fallen nature.

We said TTC! Because of man's fallen nature, God created 3 institutions (the family, the Church and civil government) to guide sinful man in the right direction here on earth, as well as preparing him for the afterlife.

Unfortunately Candace Owens doesn't acknowledge that, as she not only embraces homosexual behavior, she embraces those lost souls being a part of God's institution of marriage.

In closing on this subject: Candace Owens had words to say that were respectful towards:

1). A unrepentant homosexual (of course she didn't acknowledge that Adolf Hitler was homosexual, as homosexual activists never want to acknowledge that Hitler was one of their own).
2). A sociopath that turned out to be one of histories worst mass murderers. Those murders included many of his fellow Germans.
3). A socialist. There are no "great" socialist countries, therefore Hitler couldn't have made Germany "great" with a socialist government.
4) And last but far from least: Candace Owens neglected to point out that Hitler was a devout hater of Judaism and Christianity, as seen in this short video.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=3&v=dbvp8wXPYYo

I want to thank you TTC, ok doser and Stripe for stopping by my thread and helping make my point that Candace Owens not only isn't a conservative, but she's a liberal posing as one.

 

[ok doser]

... Candace Owens ... embraces those lost souls (homosexuals) being a part of God's institution of marriage.

cite?