Why Homosexuality MUST Be Recriminalized! Part 4

[Eeset]

How old were you when you first learned about age of consent laws?

 

[aCultureWarrior]

Quote Originally Posted by aCultureWarrior

And I am one of many in this once great nation of ours that is taking it upon themselves to tell people where "garbage" belongs (in a garbage dump, not in invaluable institutions).

I see that neither you nor the guy who thanked you for your post (the thread's puritanical poster) have a comment on my above post about the necessity of age of consent laws.

There already are age of consent laws in England and they ain't gonna be lowered so just yet more blah blah blah from ya dude. Ya may not be a 'Moby' but you sure are a clown...

You not only saw that the necessity of age of consent laws was questioned here by a US citizen, but by someone who is in a Christian forum.

Now please Mr. puritanical poster, explain why those laws are on the books and why those laws need to be rigidly enforced so that 9 year olds can't be legally raped by the likes of leading UK homosexual activist Peter the pedophile Tatchell.

 

[aCultureWarrior]

How old were you when you first learned about age of consent laws?

Irrelevant. Explain why children don't need to be protected against adults that "groom" them for sex (yes folks, we're having this discussion in a Christian forum).

The Grooming Process of a Child Sexual Predator.
https://www.families.com/blog/the-grooming-process-of-a-child-sexual-predator

How Pedophiles Groom Our Children
And Us!
http://www.renegadepopo.com/how-pedophiles-groom--printer-version.php

 

[Eeset]

Irrelevant. Explain why children don't need to be protected against adults that "groom" them for sex (yes folks, we're having this discussion in a Christian forum).

So you think a law not known does you some sort of good?

 

[aCultureWarrior]

Originally Posted by aCultureWarrior

Irrelevant. Explain why children don't need to be protected against adults that "groom" them for sex (yes folks, we're having this discussion in a Christian forum).

So you think a law not known does you some sort of good?

I guarantee you that every (accused) pedophile/pederast like Harvey Milk, Terry Bean and Ed Murray knew/know about sexual age of consent laws.

Now explain why protecting children from adults who groom them for sex isn't necessary.

 

[Eeset]

So you think writing laws protects people?

 

[aCultureWarrior]

So you think writing laws protects people?

That's the idea behind righteous laws: to punish the guilty (which in the long run hopefully helps them see the ways of righteousness) and to help protect the innocent.

I'm not sure if I'd asked you this yet: Could you explain why protecting children from adults who groom them for sex isn't necessary?

 

[Eeset]

That's the idea behind righteous laws: to punish the guilty (which in the long run hopefully helps them see the ways of righteousness) and to help protect the innocent.

I'm not sure if I'd asked you this yet: Could you explain why protecting children from adults who groom them for sex isn't necessary?

Did someone protect you?

 

[aCultureWarrior]

Quote Originally Posted by aCultureWarrior

That's the idea behind righteous laws: to punish the guilty (which in the long run hopefully helps them see the ways of righteousness) and to help protect the innocent.

I'm not sure if I'd asked you this yet: Could you explain why protecting children from adults who groom them for sex isn't necessary?

Did someone protect you?

As a child, righteous laws and protective parents.

I see where you'd going with this Eeset:

Like UK homosexual activist Peter Tatchell, I believe that you think that some children "enjoy" having sex with adults, meaning that our prudish society should make laws allowing children to decide for themselves if they want to have sex and with whom.

We've seen the downside of out of wedlock sex (abortions, disease, heartache) and homosex (disease, misery and death). What's the upside of children having sex, in this case with adults?

Plus every child deserves an age of innocence.

Perhaps you believe the following:

"What 10 year old Billy and 68 year old Ed Murray do in the confines of Ed's sodomy chambers is no one's business"?

 

[patrick jane]

Quote Originally Posted by aCultureWarrior

That's the idea behind righteous laws: to punish the guilty (which in the long run hopefully helps them see the ways of righteousness) and to help protect the innocent.

I'm not sure if I'd asked you this yet: Could you explain why protecting children from adults who groom them for sex isn't necessary?



As a child, righteous laws and protective parents.

I see where you'd going with this Eeset:

Like UK homosexual activist Peter Tatchell, I believe that you think that some children "enjoy" having sex with adults, meaning that our prudish society should make laws allowing children to decide for themselves if they want to have sex and with whom.

We've seen the downside of out of wedlock sex (abortions, disease, heartache) and homosex (disease, misery and death). What's the upside of children having sex, in this case with adults?

Plus every child deserves an age of innocence.

Perhaps you believe the following:

"What 10 year old Billy and 68 year old Ed Murray do in the confines of Ed's sodomy chambers is no one's business"?

It's a shame you suggest that Eeset thinks that some children "enjoy" having sex with adults and that she believes laws to let children decide are needed. Comparing her to Peter Tatchell? Does your vitriol know no bounds?

 

[aCultureWarrior]

It's a shame you suggest that Eeset thinks that some children "enjoy" having sex with adults and that she believes laws to let children decide are needed. Comparing her to Peter Tatchell? Does your vitriol know no bounds?

I find it equally disturbing not only that Eeset questioned the need for sexual age of consent laws, but the guy who in college was asked by another guy if he wanted...didn't even question her answer.

http://theologyonline.com/showthrea...ized!-Part-4&p=5076862&viewfull=1#post5076862

 

[Arthur Brain]

You not only saw that the necessity of age of consent laws was questioned here by a US citizen, but by someone who is in a Christian forum.

Now please Mr. puritanical poster, explain why those laws are on the books and why those laws need to be rigidly enforced so that 9 year olds can't be legally raped by the likes of leading UK homosexual activist Peter the pedophile Tatchell.

Hmm, well Mr Dingbat, it's pretty darn obvious why these laws are on the books and also why they're rigidly enforced, along with investigations into those who have abused children in the past aka Jimmy Saville etc.

Not a jot to do with homosexuality however or laws surrounding though by all means continue with the same tired conflation and 'slippery slopes'.

Kinda boring but predictable and not real interested right now. Let me know when one of these 200-300 fans of yours show up with some support...

 

[aCultureWarrior]

Quote Originally Posted by aCultureWarrior

You not only saw that the necessity of age of consent laws was questioned here by a US citizen, but by someone who is in a Christian forum.

Now please Mr. puritanical poster, explain why those laws are on the books and why those laws need to be rigidly enforced so that 9 year olds can't be legally raped by the likes of leading UK homosexual activist Peter the pedophile Tatchell.

Hmm, well Mr Dingbat, it's pretty darn obvious why these laws are on the books and also why they're rigidly enforced, along with investigations into those who have abused children in the past aka Jimmy Saville etc.

Not a jot to do with homosexuality however or laws surrounding though by all means continue with the same tired conflation and 'slippery slopes'.

Kinda boring but predictable and not real interested right now. Let me know when one of these 200-300 fans of yours show up with some support...

As usual, your ire is at me, not the LGBTQ friendly person who actually questioned the necessity of age of consent laws (Eeset).

As far age of consent laws not having anything to do with homosexuality:

We could go over child indoctrination by the LGBTQueer movement or taking away parental rights, but how about we just go straight to the source (State Level #7)?

7. Repeal of all laws governing the age of sexual consent.
http://www.rslevinson.com/gaylesissues/features/collect/onetime/bl_platform1972.htm

Oh and Art, don't be angry at me, the above link is a pro LGBTQueer site.

 

[Arthur Brain]

As usual, your ire is at me, not the LGBTQ friendly person who actually questioned the necessity of age of consent laws (Eeset).

As far age of consent laws not having anything to do with homosexuality:

We could go over child indoctrination by the LGBTQueer movement or taking away parental rights, but how about we just go straight to the source (State Level #7)?

7. Repeal of all laws governing the age of sexual consent.
http://www.rslevinson.com/gaylesissues/features/collect/onetime/bl_platform1972.htm

Oh and Art, don't be angry at me, the above link is a pro LGBTQueer site.

Dude, I have no ire at you or anger. You can be a real clown but I don't think there's any real maliciousness in you after all this time, even with the lame innuendo and stuff. Whether or not you're homosexual is only known to you but this thread is a joke man. Go and actually live life in the real world and don't make this blog your actual life as it seems to be. Most posters here do have lives outside of the forum ya know?

 

[glassjester]

Go and actually live life in the real world and don't make this blog your actual life as it seems to be. Most posters here do have lives outside of the forum ya know?

:up:

 

[Rusha]

I find it equally disturbing not only that Eeset questioned the need for sexual age of consent laws, but the guy who in college was asked by another guy if he wanted...didn't even question her answer.

IF that is the case, where were you on all the threads that discussed and even promoted underage teenage girls being pushed to marry adult men who had sex with them and/or impregnated them and the condoning of teen/adult relationships/marriages?

 

[musterion]

I find it equally disturbing not only that Eeset questioned the need for sexual age of consent laws, but the guy who in college was asked by another guy if he wanted...didn't even question her answer.

http://theologyonline.com/showthrea...ized!-Part-4&p=5076862&viewfull=1#post5076862

Because, pretend conservative and moron, when I saw her evasive non-answer, I realized once again there's never a point in discussing anything with Eeset, gave up, and carried on with Tinark.

Are you really this stupid or is it just part of the script?

 

[aCultureWarrior]

Originally Posted by aCultureWarrior
I find it equally disturbing not only that Eeset questioned the need for sexual age of consent laws, but the guy who in college was asked by another guy if he wanted...didn't even question her answer.

IF that is the case, where were you on all the threads that discussed and even promoted underage teenage girls being pushed to marry adult men who had sex with them and/or impregnated them and the condoning of teen/adult relationships/marriages?

I have spoken out excessively against the false religion of Islam and Sharia Law in this thread and others Sandy.

http://www.islammonitor.org/uploads/pics/eleven.jpg

 

[aCultureWarrior]

Originally Posted by aCultureWarrior
As usual, your ire is at me, not the LGBTQ friendly person who actually questioned the necessity of age of consent laws (Eeset).

As far age of consent laws not having anything to do with homosexuality:

We could go over child indoctrination by the LGBTQueer movement or taking away parental rights, but how about we just go straight to the source (State Level #7)?

7. Repeal of all laws governing the age of sexual consent.
http://www.rslevinson.com/gaylesissu...atform1972.htm

Oh and Art, don't be angry at me, the above link is a pro LGBTQueer site.

Dude, I have no ire at you or anger. You can be a real clown but I don't think there's any real maliciousness in you after all this time, even with the lame innuendo and stuff. Whether or not you're homosexual is only known to you but this thread is a joke man. Go and actually live life in the real world and don't make this blog your actual life as it seems to be. Most posters here do have lives outside of the forum ya know?

Can we both agree Art that adult-child rape "sexual freedom" is an important topic to discuss in this day and age, a day and age where we're flushing mores' established by a bunch of Middle Eastern goat herders 2,000 + years ago down the proverbial toilet?

Can we both agree Art that when a TOL'er brought up the subject of doing away with child rape laws in the thread created by the guy who in college was offered oral sex by another guy (and was tempted to take him up on the offer) and not one peep about it was commented on in the entire thread, that is a sign of 'intellectual tolerance'?

Can we both agree Art that an open civil discussion about child rape 'sexual liberty for all' (a topic that not that many years ago would have only been discussed in the back room of a porn shop) is important in a Christian forum and that it's fantastic that not one person has come forward and called the person who suggested it a "despicable pervert" or suggested what Jesus said: threatened to throw a millstone around her neck Matthew 18:6?

https://www.adventuresinartandmusic.ca/uploads/Millstone3__600_x_452_.jpg

As the old commercial of Virginia Slims cigarettes used to say:

"You've come a long way baby, to get where you've got to today...".

Can we both agree Art that it's a good thing where we as a civilization have gotten to today, in this case the civil discussion of adult-child "love"?

 

[Rusha]

I have spoken out excessively against the false religion of Islam and Sharia Law in this thread and others Sandy.

Oh, it's swell that you have *selective* outrage over who shouldn't prey on children ... care to try again and change it to anyone who willfully preys on children and teens?