Why Homosexuality MUST Be Recriminalized! Part 4

Status
Not open for further replies.
aCultureWarrior

aCultureWarrior

BANNED
Banned
LIFETIME MEMBER
Quote: Originally posted by Lon
I have relatives [who've engaged in homosexual behavior]. They are dying. You?

MrDante said:
I'm sorry to hear that. But everyone will go through relatives dying at some point.
Click to expand...

Those who have loved ones that engage in homosexuality seem to go through it more often.

mosaic.jpg

http://obit.glbthistory.org/olo/index.jsp
 
aCultureWarrior

aCultureWarrior

BANNED
Banned
LIFETIME MEMBER
I've exposed proud and unrepentant homosexual and Donald Trump supporter Milo Yiannopoulos on several occasions in Part 4, showing that while he might embrace some conservative values, he's still a sexual anarchist who is staunchly against Judeo-Christian doctrine when it comes to human sexuality.
http://theologyonline.com/showthrea...37370&highlight=Milo+Yiannopoulos#post4937370
http://theologyonline.com/showthrea...ized!-Part-4&p=4804920&viewfull=1#post4804920
http://theologyonline.com/showthrea...99534&highlight=Milo+Yiannopoulos#post4799534
http://theologyonline.com/showthrea...ized!-Part-4&p=4911513&viewfull=1#post4911513

Etc. etc.

In this 28+ minute video of AFTAH's Peter LaBarbera's interview with Chaps Klingenschmitt:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fdz6C2eLAIo
http://americansfortruth.com/2017/0...a-on-milo-yiannopoulos-and-gay-conservatives/

I have to point out when Klingenschmitt talks about Yiannopoulos speaking out against the LGBTQ agenda, etc. (3:11 mark on the video) that neither LaBarbera nor Klingenschmitt see the obvious:

Without the LGBTQ agenda, Milo Yiannopoulos wouldn't be where he is today.

1) It was the LGBTQ movement (that Yiannopoulos is supposedly against) lead by the terrorist tactics of APA psychologists Frank Kameny and Barbara Gittings that was responsible for homosexuality no longer being classified as a mental illness, and hence in many States, homosexuality being decriminalized.

2). It was the LGBTQ movement (that Yiannopoulos is supposedly against) that allows him to enjoy homosexual 'culture' (parades, festivals, cinema, periodicals, dating services, etc.) without threat of retaliation by righteous laws.

3). It was the LGBTQ movement (that Yiannopoulos is supposedly against), through it's agenda (and terrorist tactics) that allows Yiannopoulos and every openly homosexual person to 'marry', adopt children, teach in public schools, serve in the military, mentor youth in organizations like the Boy Scouts of America and not be denied housing or employment based on their sexual perversion.

My point?

Take away all of the above and see how "conservative" Milo Yiannopoulos really is.
 
M

MrDante

New member
Lon said:
No, but that accusation wasn't on the table.
Click to expand...
it's what's been going on here for last few dozen pages.

Conversation over.
Click to expand...
Whatever

:nono: Gays picketed and lobbied for decades and it was rather 'relenting' than based off any good studies.
Click to expand...
That kind of flies in the face of the public record and the writings of the men and women who were there.

Decades? Homosexuality didn't appear in the DSM until 1968 and it did so without any evidence that it was a pathology. and removed in 1973. Five years isn't even one decade


as for your "good studies" nonsense: Beginning in February 1973 the APA's Nomenclature Committee went through an 11-month process by preparing a report recommending the change in DSM-II. This process was open to any APA member and in the course of the 11 months 78 different studies and were examined. The committee specifically invited most vocal opponents of the removal of homosexuality from the DSM, Charles Socarides, Irving Bieber, and Robert McDevitt, to present research and evidence. While all three attended meetings they presented no research and no evidence to support the claim that homosexuality was a mental illness. Instead they chose to complain how the this was a political move not a scientific one.

At the end of this process the APA's Council on Research and Development unanimously recommended deletion of homosexuality from DSM-II to the APA Board of Trustees. That board again invited , Charles Socarides, Irving Bieber, and Robert McDevitt, to present their case. Bieber restated the old theories without presenting data to support them. Socarides and McDevitt complained that the change in classification was motivated by politics, not by scientific studies. When the trusties held their meting to vote on the proposal they again asked Socarides and McDevitt if they could present any research or any evidence supporting their view of homosexuality as a pathology. They could not produce any. The board voted, unanimously, to approve the removal of homosexuality from DSM-II.

Ref:
American Psychiatry and Homosexuality: An Oral History by Jack Dresher and Joseph Merlino
Homosexuality and American Psychiatry: The Politics of Diagnosis by Ronald Bayer by Alan Sears and Craig Osten
A Symposium: Should Homosexuality be in the APA Nomenclature? Dr. Robert Stoller
A History of Homosexuality and Organized Psychoanalysis J. Drecher

These people were actually there and involved in the decision.



You cannot dispute with the cdc or census bureau. "Actual" data collecting is what they do.
Click to expand...
The census bureau?

I gave it in the next post: cdc.gov cdc.ca ecdc.eu. There are whole sections on HIV, homosexual health risk etc. Anybody can look this up. For free even.

Sorry to disappoint you. Are you perhaps gay? I would offer sympathy but by your second line above, you don't want any. I am just sorry for you.
Click to expand...
I confront racists lies about African Americans as well. Do you think that makes me black?
 
M

MrDante

New member
aCultureWarrior said:
Quote: Originally posted by Lon
I have relatives [who've engaged in homosexual behavior]. They are dying. You?



Those who have loved ones that engage in homosexuality seem to go through it more often.

mosaic.jpg

http://obit.glbthistory.org/olo/index.jsp
Click to expand...



and here is a data base on the obituaries of civil rights activists. They die a lot too. Does this mean you want to criminalize being black or do you just want to skip ahead to genocide?
 
M

MrDante

New member
Cellar Door said:
Homosexuality is largely a culture of drugs and unsafe sexual exploits. Your average gay civil union knowingly and willfully engage in adultery with other partners.

These things are facts- facts which just fit in to why homosexuality was always seen as a damn deranged state of being in the first place.

Liberals only defend it because it's the opposite of a Christian standard. They've just gotten really good at lying about their motives is all.
Click to expand...
Can you support these "facts" with evidence? Dodge tried and failed.
 
JudgeRightly

JudgeRightly

裁判官が正しく判断する
Staff member
Administrator
Super Moderator
Gold Subscriber
MrDante said:
Just smell that fresh brewed hate. And that hate is harming not just you and but countless others


Anyone who claims to be in the light but hates a brother or sister is still in the darkness. Anyone who loves their brother and sister lives in the light, and there is nothing in them to make them stumble. But anyone who hates a brother or sister is in the darkness and walks around in the darkness. They do not know where they are going, because the darkness has blinded them. John 2:9-11



So you have been warned that you are engaging in harmful behavior. Will that prompt you to change or to engage in denial?
Click to expand...

MrDante said:
Can you support these "facts" with evidence? Dodge tried and failed.
Click to expand...
Homosexuality and sanity are mutually exclusive. Here's an example of why:

http://www.foxnews.com/us/2016/05/0...fter-some-complaints-it-wasn-t-inclusive.html

http://www.chicagotribune.com/lifestyles/sc-daddy-daughter-dance-family-0419-20160415-story.html

Not inclusive eh? Calling them "family events"? But what about the kids that DON'T have families????

http://kgov.com/bel/20170320
 
dodge

dodge

New member
MrDante said:
truth doesn't need to hit anyone.

Truth is you posted false claims and the truth is i fact checked them and put up the truth. And the truth is you have done your best to avoid that truth.
Click to expand...

No one posted false claims YOU are UN-able to accept the truth.
 
aCultureWarrior

aCultureWarrior

BANNED
Banned
LIFETIME MEMBER
Quote: Originally posted by aCultureWarrior
Those who have loved ones that engage in homosexuality seem to go through it more often [watching their loved ones die].
http://obit.glbthistory.org/olo/index.jsp


MrDante said:
and here is a data base on the obituaries of civil rights activists. They die a lot too. Does this mean you want to criminalize being black or do you just want to skip ahead to genocide?
Click to expand...

Tom Hayden, Coretta Scott King, Teddy Kennedy: Satan has some big names down there that will be spending eternity in damnation with him.

Speaking of Teddy Kennedy:

Bottoms+Up+Ted.jpg


Did you know that prior to pushing a pro abortion/pro LGBTQ agenda, that Teddy was pro life?

Pro choice Kennedy was pro life in 1971
http://www.wnd.com/2005/08/31615/

So what caused Teddy Kennedy to go from being pro life/pro traditional family values to being a promoter of mass murder and perversion?

Perhaps after getting away with one murder on the night of July 18, 1969, he figured "What's 40 million more?"
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top