Why Homosexuality MUST Be Recriminalized! Part 4

Status
Not open for further replies.

JudgeRightly

裁判官が正しく判断する
Staff member
Administrator
Super Moderator
Gold Subscriber
Welcome to the LGBTQ world, a world full of confusion. The wrestler is a biological girl, who has taken testosterone to become a pretend boy. Because the great State of Texas doesn't allow students to compete against the opposite sex, the testosterone filled girl (wannabe boy) competed in the girl's tournament.

Yes, it's confusing, but think how confused this poor girl is because no one is around to help her overcome her gender confusion.
Something else to be learned from this...

Men are better at sports than women are. Even "pretend" boys, perverse as it is. If they weren't, then the girl probably wouldn't have won the tournament, even filled with testosterone.

Just goes to show how God created man and woman different.

Even in their sin they affirm the way God made them.

Sent from my Pixel XL using TheologyOnline mobile app
 

aCultureWarrior

BANNED
Banned
LIFETIME MEMBER
Originally Posted by aCultureWarrior
Welcome to the LGBTQ world, a world full of confusion. The wrestler is a biological girl, who has taken testosterone to become a pretend boy. Because the great State of Texas doesn't allow students to compete against the opposite sex, the testosterone filled girl (wannabe boy) competed in the girl's tournament.

Yes, it's confusing, but think how confused this poor girl is because no one is around to help her overcome her gender confusion.

Something else to be learned from this...

Men are better at sports than women are. Even "pretend" boys, perverse as it is. If they weren't, then the girl probably wouldn't have won the tournament, even filled with testosterone.

Just goes to show how God created man and woman different.

Even in their sin they affirm the way God made them.

The agenda behind this transvestite/transsexual insanity can be traced back to the original 1972 "Gay Agenda" which states:

"6. Repeal of all state laws prohibiting transvestism and cross-dressing."
http://www.rslevinson.com/gaylesissues/features/collect/onetime/bl_platform1972.htm

Up until just a few decades ago, many municipalities had laws against cross dressing, one of the reasons for doing so is because transvestites are known for partaking in prostitution (contrary to what you Libertarians following this thread think, prostitution is not a "victimless crime").

Since various municipalities decriminalized transvestism, and federal courts overstepped their boundaries by ruling against such laws, we're seeing the results of the effort that the child molesting LGBTQueer movement worked so hard to achieve:

50+ gender identities and children like 'Melissa'? Beggs ruining their lives.

Here's some history of laws that prohibited people from dressing so as to appear as a member of the opposite sex:

Cross-Dressing and the Law
http://fashionlawwiki.pbworks.com/w/page/11611171/Cross-Dressing and the Law


transvestite.jpg

https://danglezz.files.wordpress.com/2012/06/transvestite.jpg
 

Arthur Brain

Well-known member
I'm so confused...
Was it a girl who wanted to be a boy who won the tournament? Or a boy who wanted to be a girl?

If there's just one reason, aside from the many other reasons, to make homosexuality and everything that goes along with it a crime, it's to prevent confusion of what should be a simple matter.

Sent from my Pixel XL using TheologyOnline mobile app

Yeh, cos making it illegal is gonna magically make everyone straight...

Thank goodness loons like you and aCW will never have your 'ideal' imposed on society.

:kookoo:
 

aCultureWarrior

BANNED
Banned
LIFETIME MEMBER
Originally Posted by JudgeRightly
I'm so confused...
Was it a girl who wanted to be a boy who won the tournament? Or a boy who wanted to be a girl?

If there's just one reason, aside from the many other reasons, to make homosexuality and everything that goes along with it a crime, it's to prevent confusion of what should be a simple matter.


Yeh, cos making it illegal is gonna magically make everyone straight...

Thank goodness loons like you and aCW will never have your 'ideal' imposed on society.

:kookoo:

Yet we've seen throughout this 4 part thread that making homosexuality and trasvestism legal, morally confused people act on their confusion without any threat of retribution. Even worse, their legal actions lead to an agenda.

For instance, who would have thought that 10 years ago that you'd be openly defending the perversions that you're currently defending, as at the time cultural mores' frowned upon your kind of moral relativism and thus you and others like you kept it hidden in the closet.
 

Arthur Brain

Well-known member
Yet we've seen throughout this 4 part thread that making homosexuality and trasvestism legal, morally confused people act on their confusion without any threat of retribution. Even worse, their legal actions lead to an agenda.

I dunno who this "we" is you're talking about as all I've seen on this epic joke of a blog is a pompous, insanely homosexuality obsessed loony ineffectually blathering on about all things gay.

For instance, who would have thought that 10 years ago that you'd be openly defending the perversions that you're currently defending, as at the time cultural mores' frowned upon your kind of moral relativism and thus you and others like you kept it hidden in the closet.

I didn't need to keep anything 'hidden in the closet' and thankfully neither do gay people anymore.

:)
 

MrDante

New member
Poor kid, she'll not only be remembered as a testosterone filled mentally ill girl who as a pretend boy won the Texas Girl's State Wrestling Tournament, she'll most likely be dead before she reaches her 35th birthday.*

Transgender boy wins Texas state girls wrestling title

Feb. 25, 2017

CYPRESS, Texas -- A 17-year-old transgender boy completed an undefeated season Saturday by winning a controversial Texas state girls wrestling title in an event clouded by criticism from those who believe the testosterone he’s taking as he transitions from female to male created an unfair advantage.
The family of Mack Beggs has said he would rather be wrestling boys, but state policy calls for students to wrestle against the gender listed on their birth certificates. So the junior from Euless Trinity beat Chelsea Sanchez 12-2 in the 110-pound weight class to improve to 56-0 and earn the championship.

Beggs fell to his knees for a moment after the win as a mixture of cheers and boos rained down on him. He then hugged his coach and left the mat.

He had a bit of fun with his fellow wrestlers at the medal ceremony when he counted down from three and all six of the top finishers posed by doing a dab on the medal stand.

Beggs, who reached the state tournament after two opponents forfeited, was dogged throughout the event by questions about whether his testosterone treatments made him too strong to wrestle fairly against girls.
http://www.cbsnews.com/news/mack-beggs-transgender-boy-wins-texas-state-wrestling-title/

mgid:ao:image:logotv.com:223321

http://imageslogotv-a.akamaihd.net/...1?quality=0.8&format=jpg&height=495&width=660
He's still more of a man than you are.
 

aCultureWarrior

BANNED
Banned
LIFETIME MEMBER
Originally Posted by aCultureWarrior
Yet we've seen throughout this 4 part thread that making homosexuality and trasvestism legal, morally confused people act on their confusion without any threat of retribution. Even worse, their legal actions lead to an agenda.

I dunno who this "we" is...

Those who have been following this thread and those throughout society who have been following the LGBTQueer agenda.


Quote: Originally posted by aCultureWarrior
For instance, who would have thought that 10 years ago that you'd be openly defending the perversions that you're currently defending, as at the time cultural mores' frowned upon your kind of moral relativism and thus you and others like you kept it hidden in the closet.

I didn't need to keep anything 'hidden in the closet' and thankfully neither do gay people anymore.

It was almost 20 years ago when one of the UK's most famous promoters of child rape (homosexual activist Peter Tatchell) openly wrote a letter to the editor stating that children as young as 9 years old often enjoy sex with adults.

Spoiler
Tatchell-Letter-1997-06-26.png
.

There was a time in western society that pedophiles like homosexual activist Peter Tatchell kept their pedophilia hidden in the closet and didn't go public with it (I won't go into detail what use to happen to perverts who promoted the rape young children, as it isn't pretty). Decriminalizing/legalizing homosexuality has brought degenerates like Tatchell out of the proverbial closet.

The same goes with things such as children as young as 15 in Oregon not needing parental authorization to get sex change/genital mutilation surgery. Perverts that promoted these atrocities against children feel safe to promote their agenda now that they don't have to worry about being arrested for buggery.
 

MrDante

New member
Originally Posted by aCultureWarrior
Yet we've seen throughout this 4 part thread that making homosexuality and trasvestism legal, morally confused people act on their confusion without any threat of retribution. Even worse, their legal actions lead to an agenda.



Those who have been following this thread and those throughout society who have been following the LGBTQueer agenda.


Quote: Originally posted by aCultureWarrior
For instance, who would have thought that 10 years ago that you'd be openly defending the perversions that you're currently defending, as at the time cultural mores' frowned upon your kind of moral relativism and thus you and others like you kept it hidden in the closet.



It was almost 20 years ago when one of the UK's most famous promoters of child rape (homosexual activist Peter Tatchell) openly wrote a letter to the editor stating that children as young as 9 years old often enjoy sex with adults.

Spoiler
Tatchell-Letter-1997-06-26.png
.

There was a time in western society that pedophiles like homosexual activist Peter Tatchell kept their pedophilia hidden in the closet and didn't go public with it (I won't go into detail what use to happen to perverts who promoted the rape young children, as it isn't pretty). Decriminalizing/legalizing homosexuality has brought degenerates like Tatchell out of the proverbial closet.

The same goes with things such as children as young as 15 in Oregon not needing parental authorization to get sex change/genital mutilation surgery. Perverts that promoted these atrocities against children feel safe to promote their agenda now that they don't have to worry about being arrested for buggery.

Too bad your Tatchell lie has been debunked a dozen times over.

Find a new lie already, this one is getting boring.
 

aCultureWarrior

BANNED
Banned
LIFETIME MEMBER
While I normally don't watch the Academy Awards because I don't want to hear all of the Hollyweird left wingers' political speeches mocking everything good and decent, I figured since Donald Trump will be at the brunt of their jokes, why not enjoy one liberal belittling another?

There were some really good movies up for the Best Picture award (I'd seen two of them: Mel Gibson's "Hacksaw Ridge" and "Lion", the true story about an East Indian boy who became separated from his family and 25 years later found them), it came as no surprise that a LGBTQ movie received the Oscar.


Those who follow the movie industry might remember that not that long ago the rainbow crowd took quite a few awards with the movie "Brokeback Mountain"
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0388795/awards

and the pro transsexual movie "Transamerica"
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0407265/awards

My point?

When laws change, cultural mores' go along with them.
 

aCultureWarrior

BANNED
Banned
LIFETIME MEMBER
I wonder if you Libertarians and pseudo conservatives that voted for Donald Trump knew that Barbie and Ken Big Al Gore would be running the show:

Ivanka, Jared Intervened To Strip Language Critical Of The Paris Climate Accords Out Of An Executive Order

Ivanka Trump and her husband, White House senior adviser Jared Kushner, intervened to get a*pending executive order stripped of language critical of an international climate agreement signed by President Barack Obama.
Kushner and Ivanka “intervened to strike language about the climate deal from an earlier draft of the executive order,” sources familiar with the matter told The Wall Street Journal.
Ivanka and her husband “have been considered a moderating influence on the White House’s position on climate change and environmental issues,” WSJ reports. Now, the executive order will have no mention of the so-called Paris agreement.
President Donald Trump is expected to sign two executive orders in the coming days to begin dismantling Obama’s Climate Action Plan and other costly environmental regulations. The orders reportedly target the Clean Power Plan (CPP), a moratorium on new coal mining leases, and the “Waters of the U.S.” rule.

Trump promised to withdraw from the Paris agreement and stop global warming payments to the U.N. while on the campaign trail. But Trump’s opposition to Obama’s climate agenda seems to be running up against his daughter’s plans.
WSJ noted the “move is the latest sign of influence Mr. Trump’s daughter and Mr. Kushner have in a White House that has seen internal divisions on a variety of issues, including foreign policy.”
A source close to Ivanka told Politico in December she “wants to make climate change — which her father has called a hoax perpetuated by the Chinese — one of her signature issues,” adding that “Ivanka is in the early stages of exploring how to use her spotlight to speak out on the issue.”
Ivanka and her father both met with former Vice President Al Gore, a global warming crusader, just days after Politico’s report. It’s unclear what was discussed at Trump Tower that day.


Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2017/02/23/i...ords-out-of-an-executive-order/#ixzz4Zw0sEwLd


85

https://www.usnews.com/dims4/USNEWS...a424/resizes/1500/161205-algore-editorial.jpg
 

aCultureWarrior

BANNED
Banned
LIFETIME MEMBER
In more Donald Trump big government/socialism news:

Here's Who Benefits the Most From Ivanka Trump's Child Care Plan

Feb. 28, 2017

Ivanka Trump has been personally lobbying lawmakers to include a new deduction for child-care expenses as part of a tax overhaul. One snag: It could cost the government hundreds of billions of dollars.
During her father's presidential campaign, Ivanka Trump advocated for making child care more affordable and accessible. She helped Donald Trump craft the child care tax plan he released in September. And she advanced a similar outline recently when she joined members of the House and Senate working on a tax proposal in a meeting in the Roosevelt Room of the White House, Bloomberg reports.
A child-care deduction-which could cost $500 billion over 10 years, according to the Tax Foundation-might not make it into any formal proposals as Washington moves ahead with an effort to rewrite the tax system. But among the questions to keep in mind if it does: Would the new feature be in addition to or instead of existing child-care benefits? And how would families of different income levels and circumstances fare under new proposals versus the existing programs?

Read more: http://www.msn.com/en-us/money/taxe...re-plan/ar-AAnyNPN?li=BBmkt5R&ocid=spartandhp

Sounds a lot like what another liberal said:

quote-it-takes-a-village-to-raise-a-child-hillary-clinton-59-67-95.jpg
 

aCultureWarrior

BANNED
Banned
LIFETIME MEMBER
Quote: Originally posted by aCultureWarrior
It was almost 20 years ago when one of the UK's most famous promoters of child rape (homosexual activist Peter Tatchell) openly wrote a letter to the editor stating that children as young as 9 years old often enjoy sex with adults.

Spoiler
Tatchell-Letter-1997-06-26.png



Too bad your Tatchell lie has been debunked a dozen times over.

Find a new lie already, this one is getting boring.

I recall discussing with alwight the atheist (RIP) UK homosexual activist Peter the pedophile's article where he attempted to explain that everything in his letter to the editor was taken out of context.

Adults should not have sex with children. I do not advocate paedophilia
http://www.petertatchell.net/lgbt_r...tement-of-clarification-by-Peter-Tatchell.htm

Note how Peter the pedophile in the above link says:

"3. I agree that for the vast majority of children, sex with adults is neither wanted nor joyful

Re: #3: According to Peter the pedophile, some child sex with adults is wanted and joyful.

"and 4. I believe an academic discussion of these issues, based on research and evidence, is legitimate and should not be misinterpreted as support for any form of child sex abuse."

Re: #4: As long as it's an academic discussion based on research and evidence (that some child sex with adults is wanted and joyful) then in the mind of homosexual activist and promoter of pedophilia Peter Tatchell, that discussion is legitimate.

Go ahead ...Dante, tell me how I "misinterpreted" Peter Tatchell's above article and how he really didn't mean those things.
 

MrDante

New member
Quote: Originally posted by aCultureWarrior
It was almost 20 years ago when one of the UK's most famous promoters of child rape (homosexual activist Peter Tatchell) openly wrote a letter to the editor stating that children as young as 9 years old often enjoy sex with adults.

Spoiler
Tatchell-Letter-1997-06-26.png





I recall discussing with alwight the atheist (RIP) UK homosexual activist Peter the pedophile's article where he attempted to explain that everything in his letter to the editor was taken out of context.

Adults should not have sex with children. I do not advocate paedophilia
http://www.petertatchell.net/lgbt_r...tement-of-clarification-by-Peter-Tatchell.htm

Note how Peter the pedophile in the above link says:

"3. I agree that for the vast majority of children, sex with adults is neither wanted nor joyful

Re: #3: According to Peter the pedophile, some child sex with adults is wanted and joyful.

"and 4. I believe an academic discussion of these issues, based on research and evidence, is legitimate and should not be misinterpreted as support for any form of child sex abuse."

Re: #4: As long as it's an academic discussion based on research and evidence (that some child sex with adults is wanted and joyful) then in the mind of homosexual activist and promoter of pedophilia Peter Tatchell, that discussion is legitimate.

Go ahead ...Dante, tell me how I "misinterpreted" Peter Tatchell's above article and how he really didn't mean those things.

Still haven't found a new lie? You're slipping.
 

aCultureWarrior

BANNED
Banned
LIFETIME MEMBER
Still haven't found a new lie? You're slipping.

I must say that I am thoroughly enjoying reviewing UK homosexual activist and promoter of pedophilia and pederasty Peter Tatchell's attempt to show that he really doesn't want child-adult sex to be legal.

Check out this quote:

"Thud interview with Lee
My critics also cite an interview / article I did with 14-year-old Lee in the late 1990s for Thud magazine, where he said that he had sex with older people when he was a young person and that he does not feel that he was abused.
This was a journalistic piece designed to let him have his say and, through him, to give a glimpse into what many young people think about the current age of consent and its failings. I believe in free speech. My critics seem to believe that young people's opinions should not be heard if they disagree with their moral perspectives. I call that censorship."

http://www.petertatchell.net/lgbt_r...tement-of-clarification-by-Peter-Tatchell.htm



So let me get this...ahem...straight Peter Tatchell: You 64 year old pedophiles/pederasts really aren't interested in having sex with 9 and 14 year olds, you just want them to be heard because they are the ones that really want to have sex with 64 year old perverts like you (i.e. do it for the children).

Sounds like something straight out of the NAMBLA handbook.
 

JudgeRightly

裁判官が正しく判断する
Staff member
Administrator
Super Moderator
Gold Subscriber
http://thepoliticalinsider.com/form...psychiatry-destroys-caitlyn-jenner-must-read/

"Such action comes “close to child abuse,” said Dr. McHugh, given that close to 80% of those kids will “abandon their confusion and grow naturally into adult life if untreated ….”"

.

http://www.foxnews.com/us/2011/10/1...ng-transgender-patients-raises-questions.html

""This is child abuse. It's like performing liposuction on an anorexic child," said Dr. Paul McHugh, professor of psychiatry at Johns Hopkins University."

Sent from my Pixel XL using TheologyOnline mobile app
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top