Why Homosexuality MUST Be Recriminalized! Part 3

[aCultureWarrior]

Quote: Originally posted by aCultureWarrior

What should we do about the HRC, the BBC and homosexual activist Peter the pedophile Tatchell who openly admitted that child rape is not always unwanted Art?

As has been pointed out there is no tolerance towards the abuse of minors over here.

I've shown otherwise.

BTW, how much time did Jimmy Saville do for the crimes he committed? (Answer NONE) :

After his death, hundreds of allegations of sexual abuse were made against him, leading the police to believe that Savile was a predatory sex offender,[3] and that he may have been one of Britain's most prolific sexual offenders.[4][5][6][7] There had been allegations during his lifetime, but they were dismissed and accusers ignored or disbelieved; Savile took legal action against some accusers.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jimmy_Savile

Regarding Harris and Hall: How many years did they get away with their child rape before they were finally caught?

Rolf Harris: In 2012, Harris was questioned by the Metropolitan Police on suspicion of historical child sexual offences. He was tried in 2014 on 12 charges of indecent assault between 1969 and 1986.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rolf_Harris

Stuart Hall: Land Registry documents show Hall, 83, then signed his share over to his wife.

Legal experts said yesterday that only his assets could be seized to pay off victims – not those of his family.

Some have suffered up to 45 years of anguish – and, so far, around six have approached law firms looking to sue for compensation.
http://www.dailystar.co.uk/news/lat...dophile-group-including-House-of-Lords-member

Regarding Hall's sentence:

Paedophile BBC presenter Stuart Hall paid £4 a week to attend classes that will teach him not to be a sex offender
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...ttend-classes-sex-offender.html#ixzz3XXExAzJZ

Yep, you Brit's are really tough on child rapists Art.

Back to the HRC, BBC and Peter the pedophile Tatchell:

So nothing should be done about the pedophiles/pederasts that are currently raping the minds, souls and bodies of innocent children?

That includes 'sexual congress' with 15 year old girls so I'm presuming you're full of righteous vitriol for any crank who would advocate such?

Poor Art, he just can't get over Phil Robertson belittling homosexuality.

Spoiler

 

[alwight]

:hammer:

 

[aCultureWarrior]

Now that Al has made such a profound statement, let's see what's going on in the White Rainbow House.

Transgender Week at the White House: Gender Neutral Bathrooms and Conversion Therapy Bans

April 10, 2015

President Barack Obama symbolically demonstrated support for certain transgender political goals this week by announcing his support for bans on conversion therapy for youth and the addition of a gender neutral bathroom in the White House.

In response to a petition posted on a White House website, the Obama administration expressed its support for Sexual Orientation Change Efforts Therapy.

Valerie Jarrett, a senior presidential adviser, wrote in the official response to the petition that President Obama supported such a ban.

"The overwhelming scientific evidence demonstrates that conversion therapy, especially when it is practiced on young people, is neither medically nor ethically appropriate and can cause substantial harm," wrote Jarrett...

An all-gender restroom is also available in the Eisenhower Executive Office Building, which provides guests and staff an additional option," said White House spokesman Jeff Tiller, noted Politico.

"The White House allows staff and guests to use restrooms consistent with their gender identity, which is in keeping with the administration's existing legal guidance on this issue and consistent with what is required by the executive order that took effect today for federal contractors."

Ex-gay organizations and their allies have denounced the White House's recent support for SOCE therapy bans, saying that such a move interferes with a youth's freedom of choice.

In a blog entry, Andrew Comiskey of Desert Stream Ministries stated that the White House response to the therapy ban petition was "ill-informed" and based on "propaganda."

"Perhaps Obama thinks he is opening up the future for a gender-confused generation. He is actually closing it," wrote Comiskey.

"In refusing to consider valid options for persons who seek clinical assistance to change their

Read more: http://www.christianpost.com/news/t...bathrooms-and-conversion-therapy-bans-137295/

I have some good news and some bad news for you parents out there:

First, the good news: If you have a child who has same sex desires or believes that he or she has gender identity issues and you support your child's moral confusion, then B. Hussein Obama/Hillary Clinton (and the Democratic Party) are the ones for you.

Now the bad news: If you have a child who has same sex desires or believes that he or she has gender identity issues and you want to do something to help them overcome those problems so that they don't end up living a life of disease and misery, it's very likely that there will be a federal law prohibiting you from doing so in the near future.

Regarding "gender neutral restrooms" : I've talked about that subject quite extensively in this 3 part thread, including the story where a transvestite exposed himself to young girls in a liberal college south of Seattle.

Washington Non-Discrimination Policy Allows Transgender Man To Share Locker Room With Young Girls
http://www.inquisitr.com/386218/was...er-man-to-share-locker-room-with-young-girls/

I've spoken with a couple of people who have said that they have no issue with gender neutral restrooms and that they'd escort their daughter into these restrooms so that they'd be safe (talk about putting a band aid over a cancer).

I have a better idea. Instead of dealing with the problem (unrighteous laws), why don't they just go out and buy their own restroom? They could haul it wherever they go and not have to worry about a mentally ill person dressed in women's clothing exposing themselves to their children.

Yep, porta potties on wheels is the answer.

(The Cadillac of porta potties shown here, smaller sizes are available).

 

[Arthur Brain]

I've shown otherwise.

No you haven't.

BTW, how much time did Jimmy Saville do for the crimes he committed? (Answer NONE) :

Well it's a bit difficult to try a corpse, I really shouldn't have to explain as even you should understand why.

After his death, hundreds of allegations of sexual abuse were made against him, leading the police to believe that Savile was a predatory sex offender,[3] and that he may have been one of Britain's most prolific sexual offenders.[4][5][6][7] There had been allegations during his lifetime, but they were dismissed and accusers ignored or disbelieved; Savile took legal action against some accusers.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jimmy_Savile

There's no doubt now that he was, and if stringent investigative procedure had been followed then he would have been rightfully prosecuted, tried and convicted. Unfortunately it wasn't and regrettably certain celebrities seemed to have a bit too much power some decades ago. Now that there's a complete crackdown on sexual offences then current and former offenders are being held accountable with zero tolerance, which is as it should be. It's how it should have been back in Saville's 'heyday' that much is true.

Regarding Harris and Hall: How many years did they get away with their child rape before they were finally caught?

Rolf Harris: In 2012, Harris was questioned by the Metropolitan Police on suspicion of historical child sexual offences. He was tried in 2014 on 12 charges of indecent assault between 1969 and 1986.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rolf_Harris

Stuart Hall: Land Registry documents show Hall, 83, then signed his share over to his wife.

Legal experts said yesterday that only his assets could be seized to pay off victims – not those of his family.

Some have suffered up to 45 years of anguish – and, so far, around six have approached law firms looking to sue for compensation.
http://www.dailystar.co.uk/news/lat...dophile-group-including-House-of-Lords-member

Regarding Hall's sentence:

Paedophile BBC presenter Stuart Hall paid £4 a week to attend classes that will teach him not to be a sex offender
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...ttend-classes-sex-offender.html#ixzz3XXExAzJZ

As above.

Yep, you Brit's are really tough on child rapists Art.

We are now yes.

Back to the HRC, BBC and Peter the pedophile Tatchell:

So nothing should be done about the pedophiles/pederasts that are currently raping the minds, souls and bodies of innocent children?

As you're aware there's zero tolerance towards child molesting/grooming/trafficking and of course I agree with that. It's also a good thing that it's no longer lawful to pack kids into degrading "reparative centres".

Poor Art, he just can't get over Phil Robertson belittling homosexuality.

Well no, my issue is with his comments about getting girls where they're as young as fifteen as that's child abuse. You seem to have no issue with that and if so you lose any right to talk about paedophilia as you vicariously support it yourself, so I'll await you to condemn Robertson's stance?

:think:

 

[aCultureWarrior]

Quote:
Originally Posted by aCultureWarrior
I've shown otherwise.

No you haven't.

Back to the reason you've been given the title "TOL's Queen of Denial".


Quote:
BTW, how much time did Jimmy Saville do for the crimes he committed? (Answer NONE) :

Well it's a bit difficult to try a corpse, I really shouldn't have to explain as even you should understand why.

And here I thought the real solution would be to arrest and imprison a child molester when he was alive.


Quote:
After his death, hundreds of allegations of sexual abuse were made against him, leading the police to believe that Savile was a predatory sex offender,[3] and that he may have been one of Britain's most prolific sexual offenders.[4][5][6][7] There had been allegations during his lifetime, but they were dismissed and accusers ignored or disbelieved; Savile took legal action against some accusers.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jimmy_Savile

There's no doubt now that he was, and if stringent investigative procedure had been followed then he would have been rightfully prosecuted, tried and convicted. Unfortunately it wasn't and regrettably certain celebrities seemed to have a bit too much power some decades ago. Now that there's a complete crackdown on sexual offences then current and former offenders are being held accountable with zero tolerance, which is as it should be. It's how it should have been back in Saville's 'heyday' that much is true.

Yet Peter the Pedophile Tatchell and other child molesters are still running free.


Quote:
Regarding Harris and Hall: How many years did they get away with their child rape before they were finally caught?

Rolf Harris: In 2012, Harris was questioned by the Metropolitan Police on suspicion of historical child sexual offences. He was tried in 2014 on 12 charges of indecent assault between 1969 and 1986.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rolf_Harris

Stuart Hall: Land Registry documents show Hall, 83, then signed his share over to his wife.

Legal experts said yesterday that only his assets could be seized to pay off victims – not those of his family.

Some have suffered up to 45 years of anguish – and, so far, around six have approached law firms looking to sue for compensation.
http://www.dailystar.co.uk/news/late...f-Lords-member

Regarding Hall's sentence:

Paedophile BBC presenter Stuart Hall paid £4 a week to attend classes that will teach him not to be a sex offender
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...#ixzz3XXExAzJZ

As above.

Ditto: Why did it take decades to arrest these pedophiles?


Quote:
Yep, you Brit's are really tough on child rapists Art.

We are now yes.

Paying them to take classes telling them not to diddle little boys and girls? (that's cruel and unusual punishment if there ever was any).


Quote:
Back to the HRC, BBC and Peter the pedophile Tatchell:

So nothing should be done about the pedophiles/pederasts that are currently raping the minds, souls and bodies of innocent children?

As you're aware there's zero tolerance towards child molesting/grooming/trafficking and of course I agree with that. It's also a good thing that it's no longer lawful to pack kids into degrading "reparative centres".

Do you practice repeating your lame excuses Art, or does it come naturally?


Quote:
Poor Art, he just can't get over Phil Robertson belittling homosexuality.

Well no, my issue is with his comments about getting girls where they're as young as fifteen as that's child abuse. You seem to have no issue with that and if so you lose any right to talk about paedophilia as you vicariously support it yourself, so I'll await you to condemn Robertson's stance?

There are plenty of real heterosexual pedophiles out there that you should condemn Art.

But you won't because they never speak out against homosexuality.

On that note: Have a wonderful gay day Art.

 

[Arthur Brain]

Back to the reason you've been given the title "TOL's Queen of Denial".

A "title" that means absolutely nothing of course, given that it was bestowed by one of the forums biggest cranks.

And here I thought the real solution would be to arrest and imprison a child molester when he was alive.

Which of course is as it should have been, as I said.

Yet Peter the Pedophile Tatchell and other child molesters are still running free.

If he's guilty of molesting or grooming a child then it's doubtful he'll be "running free" for long.

Ditto: Why did it take decades to arrest these pedophiles?

Because unfortunately it was easier to cover it up and police investigation wasn't as advanced as it is now, sadly enough.

Paying them to take classes telling them not to diddle little boys and girls? (that's cruel and unusual punishment if there ever was any).

Eh, it's unlikely that Hall will see the light of day outside a prison again.

Do you practice repeating your lame excuses Art, or does it come naturally?

Having a stance that child molesting, grooming and trafficking is completely unacceptable equates to "lame excuses" in your world? Are you on drugs?

:AMR:

There are plenty of real heterosexual pedophiles out there that you should condemn Art.

But you won't because they never speak out against homosexuality.

I condemn anyone who molests or advocates the molestation of children. So once again you're wrong, and I'm still not seeing your own condemnation of Robertson's sentiments either. Why is that?

:think:

On that note: Have a wonderful gay day Art.

Er, have one yourself...

:freak:

 

[aCultureWarrior]

...It's also a good thing that it's no longer lawful to pack kids into degrading "reparative centres".

I couldn't get your words out of my mind.

A few pages back I posted a riddle that started with

"What do you call an adult who attempts to talk a child out of same sex desires?"

Find the riddle and read it while you're looking at yourself in a mirror Art.

Sometimes people need to look at themselves dead in the eyes to see what they really are.

 

[Arthur Brain]

I couldn't get your words out of my mind.

A few pages back I posted a riddle that started with

"What do you call an adult who attempts to talk a child out of same sex desires?"

Find the riddle and read it while you're looking at yourself in a mirror Art.

Sometimes people need to look at themselves dead in the eyes to see what they really are.

Eh, I don't think I'll bother if it's all the same to you Connie. Unlike yourself perhaps I don't need to look in the mirror to know I like women, emphasis on that being women there and not girls.

Oh, that reminds me, are you ready to condemn Robertson yet?

:think:

 

[aCultureWarrior]

Quote:
Originally Posted by aCultureWarrior
I couldn't get your words out of my mind.

...It's also a good thing that it's no longer lawful to pack kids into degrading "reparative centres".

A few pages back I posted a riddle that started with

"What do you call an adult who attempts to talk a child out of same sex desires?"

Find the riddle and read it while you're looking at yourself in a mirror Art.

Sometimes people need to look at themselves dead in the eyes to see what they really are.

Eh, I don't think I'll bother if it's all the same to you Connie. Unlike yourself perhaps I don't need to look in the mirror to know I like women, emphasis on that being women there and not girls.

Let's talk about those horrid reparative centers that you, B. Hussein Obama and the pedophiles of the LGBTQueer/NAMBLA movement hate so much.

I don't know if you own your own hair salon Art, but this is how the free enterprise system here in America works:

1). You have to get a business license issued by the government in order to start a reparative therapy center.

Now pay real close attention to this next part Art, as it's the gist of the post:

2). Once a business opens, if their service doesn't satisfy those seeking their services, due to financial reasons it will be forced to close.

Obviously if there are reparative therapy centers across the US, people are using them and they are successful at what they do (helping children and adults alike leave same sex behavior and often times desires behind).

Oh, that reminds me, are you ready to condemn Robertson yet?

:think:

I can't imagine the pain that you're going through Art with the desires that you have. I'll continue to pray that you'll find the courage to seek spiritual and psychological guidance.

 

[aCultureWarrior]

Since we're on the topic of reparative therapy, check out this interview by CNN's head pedophile, especially around the 2:10 minute mark where he's concerned about "what parents want" (those nosy parents, not wanting their child to turn out like Andy Cooper, what's wrong with them?).

Texas State Representative Bryan Hughes did an excellent job talking about God's design for human sexuality (when he wasn't being interrupted by a very concerned pedophile).



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sTLt1biccww

 

[Quetzal]

I am impressed there are three parts to this nonsense...

 

[aCultureWarrior]

I am impressed there are three parts to this nonsense...

If only the American people knew the truth about this absolutely filthy disease ridden behavior and the jackbooted thug-child molesting agenda then threads like this wouldn't be necessary.

 

[Quetzal]

If only the American people knew the truth about this absolutely filthy disease ridden behavior and the jackbooted thug-child molesting agenda then threads like this wouldn't be necessary.

Oh... I see... :rotfl:

 

[aCultureWarrior]

Oh... I see... :rotfl:

Thank you for an absolutely brilliant contribution to the thread Que.

Since you're new to TOL and this thread, you should know that I do hand out free tips:

Spoiler

 

[Arthur Brain]

Let's talk about those horrid reparative centers that you, B. Hussein Obama and the pedophiles of the LGBTQueer/NAMBLA movement hate so much.

I don't know if you own your own hair salon Art, but this is how the free enterprise system here in America works:

1). You have to get a business license issued by the government in order to start a reparative therapy center.

Now pay real close attention to this next part Art, as it's the gist of the post:

2). Once a business opens, if their service doesn't satisfy those seeking their services, due to financial reasons it will be forced to close.

Obviously if there are reparative therapy centers across the US, people are using them and they are successful at what they do (helping children and adults alike leave same sex behavior and often times desires behind).

Well, if adults wish to subject themselves to the degrading nonsense that goes on in these places then that's certainly up to them. Forcing children to undergo such "procedures" and "therapy" is another thing altogether and recent rulings reflect that and rightly so.

I can't imagine the pain that you're going through Art with the desires that you have. I'll continue to pray that you'll find the courage to seek spiritual and psychological guidance.

Hmm, having a penchant for beautiful women has never struck me as being especially painful, quite the opposite in fact. Not sure why you think it would be?

:idunno:

OTOH perhaps it's you who still needs to take a look in the mirror?

:think:

Oh, I see you're obviously fine with Robertson's advocation of "getting 15 year old girls" so by association that makes you an advocate of paedophilia by not condemning it - unless you'd care to break your deafening silence on the subject?

 

[Arthur Brain]

If only the American people knew the truth about this absolutely filthy disease ridden behavior and the jackbooted thug-child molesting agenda then threads like this wouldn't be necessary.

It's almost cute that you actually think this thread is 'providing a service'...

:chuckle:

 

[Quetzal]

Thank you for an absolutely brilliant contribution to the thread Que.

Since you're new to TOL and this thread, you should know that I do hand out free tips:

Spoiler

Oh come on, cut me a break. Look, you have a three part epic going on here. It is clear that we disagree. What would you like me to say? I am obviously not going to change your mind and your platform is way too far to the right for me to even consider it.

With that said, I decided to cut out the formal back-and-forth and skipped straight to laughing at you because... well... I find you hilarious.

 

[aCultureWarrior]

Quote:
Originally Posted by aCultureWarrior
Let's talk about those horrid reparative centers that you, B. Hussein Obama and the pedophiles of the LGBTQueer/NAMBLA movement hate so much.

I don't know if you own your own hair salon Art, but this is how the free enterprise system here in America works:

1). You have to get a business license issued by the government in order to start a reparative therapy center.

Now pay real close attention to this next part Art, as it's the gist of the post:

2). Once a business opens, if their service doesn't satisfy those seeking their services, due to financial reasons it will be forced to close.

Obviously if there are reparative therapy centers across the US, people are using them and they are successful at what they do (helping children and adults alike leave same sex behavior and often times desires behind).

Well, if adults wish to subject themselves to the degrading nonsense that goes on in these places then that's certainly up to them. Forcing children to undergo such "procedures" and "therapy" is another thing altogether and recent rulings reflect that and rightly so.

Then you and CNN's head pedophile Andy Cooper both agree that nosy parents don't have any right to tell their children what's best for them?

Quote:
I can't imagine the pain that you're going through Art with the desires that you have. I'll continue to pray that you'll find the courage to seek spiritual and psychological guidance.

Hmm, having a penchant for beautiful women has never struck me as being especially painful, quite the opposite in fact. Not sure why you think it would be?

OTOH perhaps it's you who still needs to take a look in the mirror?

Oh, I see you're obviously fine with Robertson's advocation of "getting 15 year old girls" so by association that makes you an advocate of paedophilia by not condemning it - unless you'd care to break your deafening silence on the subject?

Your obsession with a devout Christian tv star who unapologetically spoke out against homosexuality during an interview to say the least is...

"disturbing" Art.

 

[Arthur Brain]

Then you and CNN's head pedophile Andy Cooper both agree that nosy parents don't have any right to tell their children what's best for them?

Nope, parents have a right to discipline their children. What they don't have the right to do is abuse their children or force them into establishments that would effectively do the same.

Your obsession with a devout Christian tv star who unapologetically spoke out against homosexuality during an interview to say the least is...

"disturbing" Art.

His comments about getting girls as young as 15 is what should be disturbing to anyone who cares about the welfare of children. The fact that you gladly give him a 'free pass' on that because you no doubt lap up everything else he says is...

Telling...

 

[aCultureWarrior]

Quote:
Originally Posted by aCultureWarrior
Thank you for an absolutely brilliant contribution to the thread Que.

Since you're new to TOL and this thread, you should know that I do hand out free tips:

Oh come on, cut me a break. Look, you have a three part epic going on here. It is clear that we disagree. What would you like me to say? I am obviously not going to change your mind and your platform is way too far to the right for me to even consider it.

With that said, I decided to cut out the formal back-and-forth and skipped straight to laughing at you because... well... I find you hilarious.

I'm always trying to improve my sense of humor Que. Where shall I start?

By laughing at these people?

Or maybe laughing at children that are being indoctrinated and exposed to every kind of perverson at gay pride parades?

Or how about those silly Christians that don't want to go against God's Word and are fined and threatened with jail time for not catering to those who proudly and unrepentantly engage in perversion?

Where shall I start Que?