Why Homosexuality MUST Be Recriminalized! Part 3

[shagster01]

Now, one would think that obtaining cheap, subsidized contraception would be low on the priority list for homosexuals, seeing that two men or two women by themselves cannot produce a child. Nevertheless, Big Gay Inc is in a tizzy over the Supreme Court decision—because Burwell vs. Hobby Lobby isn’t really about contraceptives but rather whether Americans like the Greens will be free to live out their religious convictions...

Read more: http://americansfortruth.com/2014/0...-case-hobby-lobby-and-should-they-be-worried/

My religious convictions mandate that I allow gays to marry, but I'm not free to live out my religious convictions. Maybe this Supreme Court ruling will help me.

 

[TracerBullet]

Quote:
Originally Posted by aCultureWarrior

To be continued starting with the letter "C" "J"
http://www.theologyonline.com/forums/showpost.php?p=3955176&postcount=413




Keep in mind Traci that these poor lost souls had 12 years ADDED to their short lives because they lived in a "homosexual friendly" environment (San Francisco CA, aka Sodomy and Gonorrhea South).



The study that I'm doing has nothing to do with the boogeyman that allegedly hides under every homosexual's bed (Dr. Paul Cameron). I'm just looking at obituaries that were listed in a homosexual periodical.

Gee Traci, I wonder how us rightwing homophobic bigots ever came up with the word "deathstyle" when talking about homosexuality?
(The vast majority of those deaths were AIDS related, even the ones that I wrote "cause of death not disclosed").



You will smile when we get to the years after the AIDS cocktails were invented. Instead of dying at the ripe old age of 30-40 like they did in the mid 1980's, homosexuals are living into their 50's! (Let's just hope that the sugar daddy money doesn't run out, i.e. tax subsidized AIDS therapy, or else we'll be going back to the 30-40 average age of death).

1. life expectancy is not calculated by using obituaries
2. Except in the case of prominent community figures obituaries are typically written by or based on information from the loved ones of the deceased. The method of using low circulation special audience newspapers means that any gay who was not famous, or active in the gay community, or in the closet, or whose family didn't place an obituary in a gay newsletter would not be included in a reading of obituaries
3. Elderly gays would be far less likely to be included in such obituaries.
4. 99+% of all gays and lesbians wouldn't have obituaries in gay newsletters
5. anyone with basic math skills can read Cameron's "study" and find places he cooked the numbers. IE according to his "data" he was able to claim lesbians have the same shortened life expectancy but his data also shows that gay men outnumber lesbians by 32 to 1

 

[TracerBullet]

Studies, so many studies. Here's a new one out of Aussieland:

Children raised by same-sex couples healthier and happier, research suggests

July 5, 2014

Children of same-sex parents enjoy better levels of health and wellbeing than their peers from traditional family units, new Australian research suggests.

In what they described as the largest study of its type in the world, University of Melbourne researchers surveyed 315 same-sex parents and 500 children about their physical health and social wellbeing.

Lead researcher Doctor Simon Crouch said children raised by same-sex partners scored an average of 6 per cent higher than the general population on measures of general health and family cohesion.

"That's really a measure that looks at how well families get along, and it seems that same-sex-parent families and the children in them are getting along well, and this has positive impacts on child health," Dr Crouch said.

There were more than 33,000 families with same-sex parents living in Australia, according to the most recent Australian Bureau of Statistics census...

Read more:
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2014-07-...ame-sex-couples-healthier-study-finds/5574168

And now a few words about the "Doctor" that did the research:

He Beamed and said, "My mummy's name is daddy" - Dr Simon Crouch

Dec. 5, 2012

Dr Simon Crouch is a gay dad with twins. He is also running the worlds largest research project into the health and wellbeing of children of same-sex attracted parents (ACHESS).

Today the influential Mamamia website published a wonderful piece by Simon and I'd encourage you all to have a read.

Read more: http://gaydadsaustralia.blogspot.com/2012/12/australia-he-beamed-and-said-my-mummys.html

I'd encourage you all to have a read as well, as it shows what these perverts are doing to the minds of innocent children.

"Researcher" Simon Crouch (R).
http://www.theconservative.co.nz/?q=node/317

Nothing terrifies aCW more than children that are happy and healthy.

 

[resurrected]

Nothing terrifies aCW more than children that are happy and healthy raised by perverts

:think:

 

[TracerBullet]

:think:

it seems you are terrified of these children as well

 

[aCultureWarrior]

I saw this post earlier. If you're going to use the words of openly homosexual psychologist and activist Gregory Herek, at least give him credit for it by posting the link that you're using (I believe that plagiarism is frowned upon around here).
http://psychology.ucdavis.edu/faculty_sites/rainbow/html/facts_cameron_obit.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gregory_M._Herek

1. life expectancy is not calculated by using obituaries

As we're seeing in the B.A.R. obituaries, if you practice homosexuality, you have a "death expectancy" at around 30-35 years old.

2. Except in the case of prominent community figures obituaries are typically written by or based on information from the loved ones of the deceased. The method of using low circulation special audience newspapers means that any gay who was not famous, or active in the gay community, or in the closet, or whose family didn't place an obituary in a gay newsletter would not be included in a reading of obituaries

I'm seeing all kinds of obituaries in the B.A.R. website.

3. Elderly gays would be far less likely to be included in such obituaries.

(If you can find an elderly homosexual). Not so Traci, the few elderly homosexuals that have surpassed their 65th birthday have their obituaries in B.A.R.

It's odd how when you look into the obituaries of a newspaper, you'll find that the majority are like this:

'Agnes Jones, 93, passed in her sleep surrounded by her children and grandchildren. She is preceded in death by her husband of 65 years, Wilbur Jones.'

How come we're seeing so few obituaries in the B.A.R. that deal with elderly homosexuals Traci?

Ya know, maybe those evil evil people at the Family Research Council made up these obituaries just like they made up the 1972 gay agenda. Yep, that must be it.

4. 99+% of all gays and lesbians wouldn't have obituaries in gay newsletters

They're part of a "community" Traci, why on earth wouldn't they want others in their "community" to know of their (early) demise?

5. anyone with basic math skills can read Cameron's "study" and find places he cooked the numbers. IE according to his "data" he was able to claim lesbians have the same shortened life expectancy but his data also shows that gay men outnumber lesbians by 32 to 1

Speaking of lesbos: I found this obit rather interesting. A lesbian diagnosed with HIV/AIDS at 18 and died from it at 25. http://70.90.168.99/olo/imagedb/1993/09/16/19930916_Baker_Joan_E/m19930916_0.jpg

 

[aCultureWarrior]

B.A.R. homosexual obituaries, 1972-2014 http://www.theologyonline.com/forums/showpost.php?p=3953367&postcount=406

1985 (continued from:

http://www.theologyonline.com/forums/showpost.php?p=3955176&postcount=413

Male, 30, cause of death not disclosed
Male, 28, AIDS
Male, 30-35 (photo), cause of death not disclosed
Male, 36, illness
Male, 53, MDA related heart attack
Male, 30, cause of death not disclosed
Male, 34, KS
Male, 44, pneumocystis/AIDS
Male, 70, cancer
Male, 33, AIDS
Male, 39, AIDS
Male, 30-35 (photo), AIDS
Male, 35, AIDS
Male, 30-35 (photo), cause of death not disclosed
Male, 29, AIDS related
Male, 46, cause of death not disclosed
Male, 35-40 (photo), undisclosed illness
Male, 31, AIDS
Male, 35, complications due to AIDS
Male, 36, AIDS related illness
Male, 44, lengthy illness
Male, 38, cause of death not disclosed
Male, 35-40 (photo), undisclosed illness
Male, age not disclosed, undisclosed illness (Shanti Project)
Male, 42, AIDS
Male, 36, AIDS related
Male, 30-35 (photo), cause of death not disclosed
Male, 37, AIDS
Male, 30-35 (photo), cause of death not disclosed
Male, 36, AIDS related
Male, 44, AIDS
Male, 30-35 (photo), AIDS
Male, 33, AIDS
Male, 35-40 (photo), cause of death not disclosed
Male, 40, AIDS
Male, 53, AIDS
Male, 36, victim of grisly murder (overkill)
http://70.90.168.99/olo/imagedb/1985/12/05/19851205_Morrison_Clyde_Eugene/m19851205_0.jpg
Male, 25, pneumonia/AIDS related
Male, 35-40 (photo), cancer related
Male, 52, undisclosed illness
Male, 41, AIDS
Male, 30-35 (photo), AIDS
Male, 49 AIDS
Male, age not disclosed, illness (Shanti Project)
Male, 35-40 (photo), pneumonia
Male, 30-35 (photo), pneumonia
Male, 30, cause of death not disclosed
Male, 39, cause of death not disclosed
Male, 30-35 (photo), illness (Shanti Project)
Male, 40, cancer
Male, 40-45 (photo), pneumonia
Male, 40-45 (photo), illness (Shanti Project)
Male, 43, illness (Shanti Project)
Male, 32, cause of death not disclosed
Male, 27, AIDS
Male, 30, illness (Shanti Project)
Male, 30-35 (photo), AIDS
Male, 43, undisclosed illness
Male, age undisclosed, illness (Shanti Project)
Male, 45, AIDS
Male, 35-40 (photo), AIDS
Male, 23, AIDS
Male, 30-35 (photo), AIDS
Male, 33, illness
Male, 35, AIDS related
Male, 30-35 (photo), undisclosed illness
Male, 35, AIDS
Male, 37, AIDS
Male, 35, AIDS
Male, 39, pneumonia
Male, 35-40 (photo), cause of death undisclosed
Male, 34, pneumonia
Male, 43, KS
Male, 30-35 (photo), AIDS
Male, 37, cause of death not disclosed
Male, 50, cancer
Male, 32, AIDS complications
Male, 48, heart disease
Male, 30-35 (photo), KS
Male, 35-40 (photo), long illness
Male, 42, AIDS
Continue with letter "T"

AIDS (acquired immune deficiency syndrome) is caused by HIV (human immunodeficiency virus), and is a syndrome that leaves the body vulnerable to a host of life-threatening illnesses. There is no cure for AIDS, but treatment with antiviral medication can suppress symptoms. AIDS is universally fatal, in large part due to the proliferation of opportunistic infections.
http://www.pennmedicine.org/encyclopedia/em_PrintImage.aspx?gcid=17015&ptid=2

 

[aCultureWarrior]

Guard your sons and daughters you moms and dads, as the predatory homosexual/bisexual pedophiles/pederasts are out there licking their chops like the wolves that they are.

Former school custodian faces more sex abuse charges

May 21, 2014

ST. PAUL, Minn. - A former St. Paul school custodian already charged with looking under a bathroom stall at an 11-year-old boy is facing seven more sets of charges for sexually abusing children and inappropriate behavior after new victims came forward.

KARE 11's news partner Minnesota Public Radio News says Walter Johann Happel, 62, of Newport, is scheduled to appear in Ramsey County Court Wednesday. Happel worked at Linwood Monroe Arts Plus school until he was put on administrative leave in February. Happel was charged Tuesday in Ramsey County District Court with seven counts of criminal sexual conduct for incidents where he allegedly sexually abused or had inappropriate interactions with children over a period of more than three decades. He's also facing six new counts of interference of privacy for incidents where he allegedly spied on or otherwise acted inappropriately with boys at the school...
Read more: http://www.kare11.com/story/news/cr...stodian-faces-more-sex-abuse-charges/9368877/


Alleged Facebook predator used fake account to flirt with hundreds of boys

July 1, 2014

YUKON, Okla. - A vigilant mother helps authorities nab an alleged internet predator, just hours after she discovered her teenage son’s conversations with the man on Facebook.

The Canadian County Sheriff’s Office says Michael Goddard, 23, of Oklahoma City, pretended to be a teenage girl on Facebook to lure in a 14-year-old Yukon boy and admitted to possibly hundreds of other victims.

He was arrested Friday night.

Goddard allegedly used the name “Nicole Tinner” and used a fake photo to flirt with hundreds of juvenile boys on Facebook.

The “girl” offered to have sex with the boys, but first, the minors were asked to post nude pictures and videos of themselves and meet Goddard.

“He is a monster,” Lt. Adam Flowers said Tuesday. “As the images progress, more clothes come off.”

He said the Yukon teen was told, “you need to make sure there’s plenty of light on your body, so turn the lights on too” and “a minute and 50 seconds (video) is short. Lol. I wanna movie of my baby boy.”

“He then blackmailed these minors, (saying) ‘if you don’t give me more, I’m going to post these on the internet. I’m going to send them to your friends’,” Flowers said....

Read more: http://kfor.com/2014/07/01/alleged-..._campaign=Feed:+kfor/mwQa+(KFOR+-+Local+News)

But then, that sort of thing is "normal" in some circles:

'Paedophilia is natural and normal for males'

How some university academics make the case for paedophiles at summer conferences

July 5, 2014

"Paedophilic interest is natural and normal for human males,” said the presentation. “At least a sizeable minority of normal males would like to have sex with children … Normal males are aroused by children.”

Some yellowing tract from the Seventies or early Eighties, era of abusive celebrities and the infamous PIE, the Paedophile Information Exchange? No. Anonymous commenters on some underground website? No again.

The statement that paedophilia is “natural and normal” was made not three decades ago but last July. It was made not in private but as one of the central claims of an academic presentation delivered, at the invitation of the organisers, to many of the key experts in the field at a conference held by the University of Cambridge.

Other presentations included “Liberating the paedophile: a discursive analysis,” and “Danger and difference: the stakes of hebephilia.”

Hebephilia is the sexual preference for children in early puberty, typically 11 to 14-year-olds...

Read more: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/10948796/Paedophilia-is-natural-and-normal-for-males.html

 

[alwight]

Rolf Harris (a Heterosexual :shocked found Guilty of sexual abuse.

The Crown Prosecution Service says it will work with the police to see if there is enough evidence to bring further charges against Rolf Harris.

Police have received new complaints against the TV entertainer, who was convicted of 12 indecent assaults on four girls in the 1960s, 70s and 80s.

The majority of allegations during Harris's trial concerned the friend of the entertainer's daughter whom he had groomed and molested from the age of 13 until she was 19.

The other victims were two women who were touched by Harris at public appearances, and an Australian woman who told the court he indecently assaulted her at a pub during a visit to London when she was 15 year old.

Six women also told the court about indecent assaults Harris had carried out against them in Australia, New Zealand and Malta. The entertainer could not be prosecuted over those incidents in a British court but the evidence was introduced as an added illustration of his behaviour.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-28102238

 

[TracerBullet]

I saw this post earlier. If you're going to use the words of openly homosexual psychologist and activist Gregory Herek, at least give him credit for it by posting the link that you're using (I believe that plagiarism is frowned upon around here).
http://psychology.ucdavis.edu/faculty_sites/rainbow/html/facts_cameron_obit.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gregory_M._Herek




As we're seeing in the B.A.R. obituaries, if you practice homosexuality, you have a "death expectancy" at around 30-35 years old.



I'm seeing all kinds of obituaries in the B.A.R. website.



(If you can find an elderly homosexual). Not so Traci, the few elderly homosexuals that have surpassed their 65th birthday have their obituaries in B.A.R.

It's odd how when you look into the obituaries of a newspaper, you'll find that the majority are like this:

'Agnes Jones, 93, passed in her sleep surrounded by her children and grandchildren. She is preceded in death by her husband of 65 years, Wilbur Jones.'

How come we're seeing so few obituaries in the B.A.R. that deal with elderly homosexuals Traci?

Ya know, maybe those evil evil people at the Family Research Council made up these obituaries just like they made up the 1972 gay agenda. Yep, that must be it.



They're part of a "community" Traci, why on earth wouldn't they want others in their "community" to know of their (early) demise?



Speaking of lesbos: I found this obit rather interesting. A lesbian diagnosed with HIV/AIDS at 18 and died from it at 25. http://70.90.168.99/olo/imagedb/1993/09/16/19930916_Baker_Joan_E/m19930916_0.jpg

life expectancy is not calculated by using obituaries

 

[aCultureWarrior]

Rolf Harris (a Heterosexual :shocked found Guilty of sexual abuse.

Thanks for letting us know that there are perverts out there that exclusively target young girls Al. Being that heterosexuality in and of itself isn't a perversion (you and I wouldn't be here if it were), what's your point?

 

[aCultureWarrior]

life expectancy is not calculated by using obituaries

I was reading over this "study" by the ultra pro homosexual Mailman School of Public Health showing that those who engage in homosexual behavior that live in a "homosexual friendly" environment live 12 years longer than those that don't (let's hope for the sake of all of those homosexuals that are dropping like flies in San Francisco that someday that city becomes "homosexual friendly").

Perhaps you could review this article and explain how the "study" was done properly.

http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2014-02/cums-lil021414.php

 

[Omniskeptical]

Nothing terrifies aCW more than children that are happy and healthy.

I can't see how Australia can get anymore pro-abortion and ignorant.

 

[alwight]

Thanks for letting us know that there are perverts out there that exclusively target young girls Al. Being that heterosexuality in and of itself isn't a perversion (you and I wouldn't be here if it were), what's your point?

My point, from a purely secular point of view aCW, is that simply deeming only homosexuality perverted while trawling the interwebs for arguably perverted individuals as examples, is a crock, because I can just as easily show you heterosexuals who are arguably just as perverted. :idunno:

So why exactly should we accept that homosexuality is intrinsically perverted?
Certainly not from the behaviour of selected individuals then.
So what could it be then?

You might claim that your God says so and that you are just being the humble obedient servant ...or perhaps you're simply a homophobic bigot who will use any pretext at all to further your homophobic agenda?

Why else would you care who people choose to be with and do together in private, who aren't child abusers, who can and do live healthy lives.

"I always distrust people who know so much about what God wants them to do to their fellows."
(Susan B Anthony)

 

[GFR7]

Have not had a chance to read this full thread or the 2 that preceded it.
While I'm not sure re-criminalization is necessary, I do think the brakes need to be put on the fuller agenda which is using same-sex marriage as it's vehicle. The social order and children will feel the affects of this reckless social experimentation far into the future. Nearly all the gay parenting studies are skewed, and the public support for SSM has been artificially constructed.

These two articles are poignant and illuminating:

http://www.americanthinker.com/2014/07/the_judiciary_and_samesex_marriage_contagion.html

http://tomohalloran.com/2014/03/26/gay-parenting-studies-flawed/



Here is another:

http://www.americanthinker.com/2014/02/manufacturing_consent_on_same_sex_marriage.html

This last is from a gay man who has this to say about public approval:

The notion that there is something unconstitutional about not buying into the equivalency of genderless marriage to gendered marriage has seized the imagination of those who hold power.

But who or what is really winning here?

Let's be clear: the American people have not fallen in love with the notion of same sex marriage, not by a long shot.

The idea of same sex marriage didn't win at the ballot box in November 2012, or at the U. S. Supreme Court last June, or among certain jurists and legislators since then: The marketing strategy developed by leftist social psychologists did.

Over the years, the Left has diligently developed strategies which win. They don't promote ideas which win on their own merit; in fact, they have had amazing success promoting ideas that most people would normally reject.

How did the Left gain the upper hand with same sex marriage? A technique identified by Cass Sunstein and Timur Kuran explains the simple, effective process: Availability Cascades.

 

[aCultureWarrior]

Quote:
Originally Posted by aCultureWarrior
Thanks for letting us know that there are perverts out there that exclusively target young girls Al. Being that heterosexuality in and of itself isn't a perversion (you and I wouldn't be here if it were), what's your point?

My point, from a purely secular point of view aCW, is that simply deeming only homosexuality perverted while trawling the interwebs for arguably perverted individuals as examples, is a crock, because I can just as easily show you heterosexuals who are arguably just as perverted.

So why exactly should we accept that homosexuality is intrinsically perverted?
Certainly not from the behaviour of selected individuals then.
So what could it be then?

From a purely secular point of view Al, anyone with one living brain cell that has been following this thread can see that those who engage in homosexual behavior are more prone to disease and early death (I'm not done with the B.A.R. obituaries by the way).

We've also seen since homosexuality was decriminalized that those same people have organized into an extremely powerful movement backed by multi national corporations and governments. As shown throughout the 3 part thread the homosexual movement has made children a huge part of their agenda.

So you see Al, those examples where I showed homosexuals preying on young boys (and in some cases girls), isn't anything out of the ordinary for those that proudly identify with the homosexual movement. Need I show more pictures of children being exposed to a gay pride parades, while public officials do nothing?

You might claim that your God says so and that you are just being the humble obedient servant ...or perhaps you're simply a homophobic bigot who will use any pretext at all to further your homophobic agenda?

Why else would you care who people choose to be with and do together in private, who aren't child abusers, who can and do live healthy lives.

"I always distrust people who know so much about what God wants them to do to their fellows."
(Susan B Anthony)

I like that word Al: "Obedient". If you truly love God you'll be obedient to His Word.

For the umpteenth time, have a healthy homosexual come forward and tell us that all of this disease and death (as reported by the Centers for Disease Control), and the indoctrination of children are nothing but LIES! LIES! LIES! made up by those of us in the vast rightwing conspiracy.

 

[aCultureWarrior]

Have not had a chance to read this full thread or the 2 that preceded it.

I highly recommend that you review the table of contents for the first two threads, posted on page 1 of Part 2.
http://www.theologyonline.com/forums/showpost.php?p=3391482&postcount=2

While I'm not sure re-criminalization is necessary, I do think the brakes need to be put on the fuller agenda which is using same-sex marriage as it's vehicle. The social order and children will feel the affects of this reckless social experimentation far into the future. Nearly all the gay parenting studies are skewed, and the public support for SSM has been artificially constructed.

If you think that this cancer that is consuming an entire body can be stopped by only dealing with one area (a very important one, the institution of marriage, but only one area nonetheless), you're gravely mistaken.

I look forward to more conversation with you after you've reviewed the 3 part thread.

 

[GFR7]

I highly recommend that you review the table of contents for the first two threads, posted on page 1 of Part 2.
http://www.theologyonline.com/forums/showpost.php?p=3391482&postcount=2



If you think that this cancer that is consuming an entire body can be stopped by only dealing with one area (a very important one, the institution of marriage, but only one area nonetheless), you're gravely mistaken.

I look forward to more conversation with you after you've reviewed the 3 part thread.

Will do as soon as I have the time. Thanks for this handy info.

 

[TracerBullet]

Have not had a chance to read this full thread or the 2 that preceded it.
While I'm not sure re-criminalization is necessary, I do think the brakes need to be put on the fuller agenda which is using same-sex marriage as it's vehicle. The social order and children will feel the affects of this reckless social experimentation far into the future. Nearly all the gay parenting studies are skewed, and the public support for SSM has been artificially constructed.

These two articles are poignant and illuminating:

http://www.americanthinker.com/2014/07/the_judiciary_and_samesex_marriage_contagion.html

http://tomohalloran.com/2014/03/26/gay-parenting-studies-flawed/

I only read the "All the gay parenting studies are flawed" For a site called the American thinker it seems very little thinking is going on.

the author claims that if a study is authored by or has n some way a contribution by a homosexual then that study is biased and useless. (he doesn't even try to hide the double standard he uses to say that naturally heterosexuals could not be biased)
He mentions a prominent researcher and bemoans the fact she is a lesbian and her longitudinal and in depth studies are therefor biased. Naturally he can not point to any actual bias in her research, he just makes the accusation.

Ultimately what the author says is that he wants to believe that gay/lesbian parents are not good parents and harm children and that he doesn't care what any research shows. if a study doesn't support his view then it is biased.

Thinking at it's very best :first:

 

[TracerBullet]

For the umpteenth time, have a healthy homosexual come forward and tell us that all of this disease and death (as reported by the Centers for Disease Control), and the indoctrination of children are nothing but LIES! LIES! LIES! made up by those of us in the vast rightwing conspiracy.

we have.