ok doser
lifeguard at the cement pond
Yep.
Nope, not a continuous single wall
So your answer to how long a wall can be before it becomes ineffective is what, exactly? Give me a number
Yep.
Not that the Maginot Line is a good example of a wall, but to be fair, it failed against the Nazis. We're not trying to keep out an army with the thing.Yep. Walls reinforced with forts and gun emplacements. Much bigger and grander than Trump's wall. It failed....
Not that the Maginot Line is a good example of a wall, but to be fair, it failed against the Nazis. We're not trying to keep out an army with the thing.
Walls don't feel good. They look bad. They bring up images of the Berlin wall. But they can be effective, up to a point.
A more effective way of dealing with the problem would be to help improve the economies south of the border.
Nope, not a continuous single wall
So your answer to how long a wall can be before it becomes ineffective is what, exactly?
Actually, Mexico's economy is doing pretty well. A lot of the immigration across the border is from Central America, now.
Not that the Maginot Line is a good example of a wall, but to be fair, it failed against the Nazis. We're not trying to keep out an army with the thing.
We have a much higher-tech wall on the border now. How's it doing?
so put up a wall and let the central americans stay in mexico
Pretty effective at catching illegals, if the leftist media are any indication
Not according to Trump, who's hyperventilating about an "infestation" of people from Latin America.
I think he meant invasion....not infestation
Maybe we can get Guatamala and Belize to pay for it, um? :chuckle:
You didn't know? Trump's proposed wall won't be a continuous single wall, either.
Donald Trump is going to build his border wall but some parts of it might be invisible, according to the man tasked with building it.
Despite Mr Trump's repeated promises to build an actual wall, it might actually rely on surveillance technology and not actually be made using any physical structure, according to Homeland Security Secretary John Kelly.
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/...ly-department-homeland-security-a7561196.html
Barbie said:How much must a box weigh before it becomes heavy?
Give me a number.
So is the following your answer to my question, "What is so bad about a wall when compared to all the evil which is resulting from the lack of a wall?":
Your problem is the fact that at this time the only practical way to end this abuse of women and children is by building a wall.
Neither you nor the Dems offer any other solution so I guess you are happy with the staus quo! Let the women continue to be raped because you do not like Trump's proposal and you and the Demos refuse to offer an alternative plan.
you don't bother looking at your own link, didja?
barbie makes post after post claiming that trump's wall will be too long to be effective
Barbie then acknowledges that shorter walls can be effective
Barbie is asked for a specific number
Guess how I know you didn't read it.
Barbie said:Despite Mr Trump's repeated promises to build an actual wall, it might actually rely on surveillance technology and not actually be made using any physical structure, according to Homeland Security Secretary John Kelly.
“Kelly said the wall will take a multi-layered approach,” Fox News reporter Catherine Herridge said. “There will be the physical wall and then parts of the wall that you can actually see through because it will rely on sensors and other technology.”
barbie said:You actually believed Trump when he said it was going to be continuous over the whole border?
barbie said:walls work more effectively, especially for keeping people in, rather than keeping them out.
barbie said:...Israel built a fence at Gaza (kinda like the U.S. uses on the border) because a wall wouldn't have worked.
barbie said:(Sod melts down)
The only wall that could be of use is the one needed to be built around Washington. Seal up those cockroaches until they outlive themselves. Paul H. Yarbrough