Anything to justify his sins.
Yet the Roman script is still part of the doctrinal foundation of the Mid/way Actors guild who claim grace is their mantra (club members need only apply) and propose a mystery never revealed until Paul who like all the other apostles are still in hiding from actually being found in the time period except for Mama Romes tales of hear say, yet a little research bursts that bubble and exposes the plagiarized nature of the Jew and Christian tales, Christ within is an ancient truth all awakened beings understood because they had the inward experience of that birth that isn't owned by any nationality or gender that causes division and feeds the duality in the temple run by religious ego and emotion.
Christianity is Paul. Without Paul, the followers of Jesus would have remained yet another Jewish sect
You are mentally deranged. No, that was NOT what I was referring to.
THIS is what I QUOTED from YOU that I REPLIED to and it was right there in my POST.
So you think that the church that was in Jerusalem was stuck at 120? You don't think that it was growing?
On the day of Pentecost alone, they added 3 thousand.
:juggle:Check the timeline...
You are one of the craziest loonie bins that we're had here for a while.Is it possible that Paul was really a Gentile masquerading as a Jew?
I am not sure...tell me how you understand his words.
You are one of the craziest loonie bins that we're had here for a while.
Phil 3:4-8 (KJV)(3:4) Though I might also have confidence in the flesh. If any other man thinketh that he hath whereof he might trust in the flesh, I more: (3:5) Circumcised the eighth day, of the stock of Israel, [of] the tribe of Benjamin, an Hebrew of the Hebrews; as touching the law, a Pharisee; (3:6) Concerning zeal, persecuting the church; touching the righteousness which is in the law, blameless. (3:7) But what things were gain to me, those I counted loss for Christ. (3:8) Yea doubtless, and I count all things [but] loss for the excellency of the knowledge of Christ Jesus my Lord: for whom I have suffered the loss of all things, and do count them [but] dung, that I may win Christ,
Acts 22:3 (KJV)
(22:3) I am verily a man [which am] a Jew, born in Tarsus, [a city] in Cilicia, yet brought up in this city at the feet of Gamaliel, [and] taught according to the perfect manner of the law of the fathers, and was zealous toward God, as ye all are this day.
Were you dropped on your head as a child? Perhaps in the delivery room?
Yes, I think that you are lying.Sometimes people lie.
I think that you take many verses out of context to attempt to make scripture say what is does not say.But sometimes they unexpectedly reveal the truth.
What did you think of the passage I quoted?
Yes, I think that you are lying.
I think that you take many verses out of context to attempt to make scripture say what is does not say.
The other writers of scripture confirm Paul's apostleship.And maybe you just excuse the problems in the Bible with the same old out of context argument.
The other writers of scripture confirm Paul's apostleship.
It is you that believes contrary to the truth.
MAD alert. You are close, but have to sway from the truth because without Paul, the whole Bible falls apart. And we are not Paul, but we are with him in the Body.
I gave a clear answer. It appears that both you and Lilstu don't like real answers.
You're Jewish and deny your Messiah. I really don't think your opinion counts on a Christian forum. Why not find yourself a Jewish Forum where you can share some camaraderie? Believe me, you're not gonna convince any "True Believer" on this forum. You're wasting your time and theirs.
You're Jewish and deny your Messiah. I really don't think your opinion counts on a Christian forum. Why not find yourself a Jewish Forum where you can share some camaraderie? Believe me, you're not gonna convince any "True Believer" on this forum. You're wasting your time and theirs.
Your opinions are unsound.2Peter is spurious IMO and Acts was written by Paul's man.
I've seen people pick and choose which parts of the Bible suit them and some that they want to throw out. You're a cherry-picker to suit your own preconceived ideas. Nothing more.What else have you got?
Does it stack up against all the evidence I have provided in this thread?
Have you read my posts and researched them?