:thumb:
Yep.
:thumb:
Didn't happen. So it's much like you attempting a rational argument of merit instead of, you know, this sort of fraud.town excuses the Watts riots
Also no, which is why you'll never find someone doing what he's attempting while actually quoting me.and applauds their beneficial effects (ignoring the 34 deaths incurred):
:doh: wot
a
retard
Well, you certainly qualify on that count.nobody believes it town
You know someone is desperate when they have to invent things to attack you with and over, but it's the way of bullies, a habit..."What'd you say about my X?" and whatnot...it's peculiar. Like spit flavored coffee. :think: Or macaroons., but feel free to go ahead and keep lying about it
You've already made up your mind.
It's a shame you are so disgusted by videos showing pretty white folks.
Didn't happen. So it's much like you attempting a rational argument of merit instead of, you know, this sort of fraud.
Also no, which is why you'll never find someone doing what he's attempting while actually quoting me.
In any event, here's the whole point of that (and apparently a great deal of his existence):
Well, you certainly qualify on that count.
You know someone is desperate when they have to invent things to attack you with and over, but it's the way of bullies, a habit..."What'd you say about my X?" and whatnot...it's peculiar. Like spit flavored coffee. :think: Or macaroons.
So have I. And black losers. And white losers. MANY white losers.
Leftists don't know any "fine black folks." They only see a sociopolitical demographic that can't possibly make it without their help, whether those individuals want it or not. Independent, self-motivated, free thinking black people are actually an insult to Leftists.
As you're mostly racist... of course.
Except that I haven't called you a racist. Not once.And I'm not a racist, and I don't care if you want to believe that, if it upsets your ordering litmus.
You think people support causes they don't believe in? :think: That would explain the election/popularity problem of the president, but why would anyone do that?Supporting or participating isn't going to prove superiority or inferiority.
It's just going to be your preference.
No, it made perfect sense to me given what He was doing with them. Ever wonder why God sent the message of grace to the Gentile?Ever wonder why GOD wanted His chosen people to not marry outside their own? And not to filter in other customs of other people?
I'd say the ethnocentric principle tends to make people more comfortable with those who are most like them. What I don't see is why anyone would think race is inherently the most determining, without qualification. That something as trivial as melanin content or facial features should make anyone more or less comfortable without consideration for the more meaningful. But I'll come back to that in a moment.I actually think there is much more unity when folks are with those they are the most comfortable with.
And I don't see one darn thing wrong with that.
It's relevant because of the wages of race or ethnic driven separation and the superiority that has always attended it, what it permits or even encourages in relation to others, usually with tragic consequences. True with the Native Americans, the German Jews, the Chinese and others under the thumb of the Japanese during WWII, and so on.I don't think I have ever said that white people (or any others) have not done despicable things.
So past history of despicable things done (by any) is irrelevant
We separate wheat from chaff and we keep close things we value most. We find those things superior to the other choices we could have made.It is separateness, but it is not superiority.
It completely does. We don't wear the thing we don't like one day and the thing we do the next, if we can afford to wear what we like.Liking one thing better than another does not automatically imply superiority.
Then you're still serving a principle that elevates the situation to the superior. So we suffer for art, or marry for love, but whatever we do, we make the choice we value and it speaks to who and what we are.One can choose a to be in a situation that is inferior on many levels, but done for principle.
Like I said, you valued something more than finances. Your value won out. You made the choice you found superior between conflicting potentials. That's what people do.I could have married a man that could have supported me financially better than the man I chose.
But I chose him over others because my preference for a husband went far beyond mere finances.
You're welcome. Because that helps me understand better where you're coming from.
You've already made up your mind.
It's a shame you are so disgusted by videos showing pretty white folks.
Shes coming from shes not ashamed of her race because you think she should be. Your attitude is the racist one.
That moronic attitude from the left, is why Trump is president. Keep it up! Soon no dems in office!
Its not racist to have a preference on what one finds attractive. Your guilt is off the the charts, seek help. Seek God, in spirit and truth this time. He is who provides a sound mind, and no, you arent "nicer" and more "righteous" than He is.
You should try saying something that's rational and honest, if only to take a break from your usual. As to the "Seek Christ" rep, I know where I don't see him. In anything you write.she'll never see it angel - it's a blind spot for libs
I can tell you sincerely mean this. Doser means it too. She will take it as an insult.
do you remember when she was a conservative Christian?