You didn't even glance at the doc, did you? :chuckle:
Where are the Fossilized Remains of Millions of Humans from the Flood?
- Thread starter Mocking You
- Start date
You didn't even glance at the doc, did you? :chuckle:
Jose Fly
New member
Because at first, all that was discovered were appendages, which by themselves do look sorta like shrimp. But once full specimens were discovered, scientists realized they had only been looking at a small part of the organism...
"Its name originates from a description of a detached 'arm', described by Joseph Frederick Whiteaves in 1892 as a separate crustacean-like creature due to its resemblance to the tail of a lobster or shrimp."
Yeah....when will those scientists start getting everything 100% right the very first time?!!!!11!! :chuckle:
Jose Fly
New member
You should yell at 6days for that, since he's the one who cited Anomalocaris' name in the first place.
Ask Mr. Religion
☞☞☞☞Presbyterian (PCA) 	
Gold Subscriber
LIFETIME MEMBER
Hall of Fame
Evolutionists hate reading.
6days
New member
Your question implies that if they aren't found together in the same fossil layer, they didn't live on earth at the same time. By that line of reasoning, we might assume coelacanths and humans didn't live at the same time. Humans and coelacanths both live in 2015 but are not found in the same geological layers.
Mocking You
New member
You are the one making inferences from my question. Whether or not dinosaurs existed at the same time as humans is only tangentially related to my question.
YECers claim the flood is responsible for fossilization. OK, so where are the human fossils?
Interplanner
Well-known member
I had a question here hours ago, but I think it was lost through a poor connection.
6days,
I don't think you've got his question. The fair question would be 'would human and coelacanth fossils of today show in the same layer in the future?' How on earth could we both be alive today but not in the same layer in future findings?
Jose Fly
New member
There are lots of reasons to reach that conclusion. Not only are they never found in the same strata, they are separated by tens of millions of years of strata.
I understand how up front, you refuse to accept that conclusion, but that only matters to you. In the meantime, science marches on, and none of it is based on your beliefs about dinos co-existing with humans.
Interplanner
Well-known member
Interplanner
Well-known member
No you don't have to, but I wouldn't be caught dead saying what Dawkins did in TIME magazine about design in microbiology. He said if there is a god, he is infinitely more capable than what the theologians have been saying. What use is infinite infinity? Pretty sloppy math for an astronomer.
Jose Fly
New member
You'll have to be more specific.
Interplanner
Well-known member
Those which have been killed by spears and clubs and rocks. Are those images false? Are they merging two times which could never have overlapped?
Jose Fly
New member
Not sure why you would say that, since it's well known that mammoths and humans co-existed (mammoths only died out about 4,500 years ago).
Last edited:
George Affleck
TOL Subscriber
Cretaceous rock is the layer of rock that many geologists say dinosaurs are found in. But they don't have any accurate way of telling how old a layer of rock is. It is Cretaceous rock because dinosaurs are in it.
If a layer of rock has dinosaurs in it then they say its roughly 165 million years old and then only accept dating methods, for that layer, that conform to that paradigm. If humans are in it they say the rock is about 1 million years old.
It is impossible for a system that excludes possibility x and is based on circular reasoning to entertain possibility x.
The same is true for creationists. We exclude long ages and evolution in general as being unbiblical and therefore nonsense. Because of this we cannot reach any conclusion that includes these things.
The difference is that the reasoning is not circular. It is a straight line.
George Affleck
TOL Subscriber
The reason we have not found fossilized remains of humans from the flood is because it was designed to destroy them from off the face of the earth.
The fact that we have not found them is evidence in support of the Bible; not against it.
Want to disprove the Bible? Find flood victims!
The fact that we have not found them is evidence in support of the Bible; not against it.
Want to disprove the Bible? Find flood victims!