SaulToPaul 2
Well-known member
Would you like to place a bet? You are embarrassingly ignorant about Catholics, and especially about me.
"all they which are in Asia have turned away from me"
mid first century
Would you like to place a bet? You are embarrassingly ignorant about Catholics, and especially about me.
massive brain trauma?
What kind of response was that?... I was showing that my beliefs are heavily rooted in the protestant reformation when you claimed they weren't..
And you respond with something totally irrelevant.
And yes, I have read extensively about your Marian doctrines and how and why they developed. Its a pagan myth integrated into Roman Catholicism to appease certain ethnicities.
I responded quite logically to this quote of yours:
"Anyhow, what Jesus and the Apostles taught trumps anything the RCC or Calvin has to say.... and they sure didn't teach any of your church's Marian doctrines... not even a little bit."
What have you read? A bunch of anti-Catholic spewing? Do you even know what my church is?
You want us to accept the uncooberated testimony of the criminal?
You are clueless.
:rotfl:Even with massive brain trauma, or in a comatose state, the Spirit of God within you would be grieved by the catholic idolatries.
Hardly "uncorroborated," since the testimony of both Divine Revelation and Christian history consistently and fully demonstrate that the Catholic Church is in fact that one historic Church founded by Jesus Christ himself.You want us to accept the uncooberated testimony of the [Catholic Church]?
Hardly "uncorroborated," since the testimony of both Divine Revelation and Christian history consistently and fully demonstrate that the Catholic Church is in fact that one historic Church founded by Jesus Christ himself.
Hardly "uncorroborated," since the testimony of both Divine Revelation and Christian history consistently and fully demonstrate that the Catholic Church is in fact that one historic Church founded by Jesus Christ himself.
Nope. Try again.The Divine Revelation of Jesus Christ told us about your church
Revelation 17:5 And upon her forehead was a name written, MYSTERY, BABYLON THE GREAT, THE MOTHER OF HARLOTS AND ABOMINATIONS OF THE EARTH. 6 And I saw the woman drunken with the blood of the saints, and with the blood of the martyrs of Jesus: and when I saw her, I wondered with great admiration.
Post your proof.Why did you exchange the truth for a lie?
The Divine Revelation of Jesus Christ told us about your church
Revelation 17:5 And upon her forehead was a name written, MYSTERY, BABYLON THE GREAT, THE MOTHER OF HARLOTS AND ABOMINATIONS OF THE EARTH.
6 And I saw the woman drunken with the blood of the saints, and with the blood of the martyrs of Jesus: and when I saw her, I wondered with great admiration.
everready
John Salza has spoken! Who could possibly refute that?Hardly "uncorroborated," since the testimony of both Divine Revelation and Christian history consistently and fully demonstrate that the Catholic Church is in fact that one historic Church founded by Jesus Christ himself.
He "knows" it because his favored recently-invented, man-made non-Catholic sect has fed it to him as a supposedly self-evident tradition of men.:doh: And you just KNOW that that verse is referring to the Catholic Church, and not the Roman Empire killing the Apostles and Christians?
:darwinsm:
Salza has outlined the authoritative teaching of Christ's one historic Church---who could possibly refute that? Certainly not the entirely non-authoritative opinions of RD's preferred recently-invented, man-made non-Catholic sect.John Salza has spoken! Who could possibly refute that?
...according to the entirely non-authoritative opinions of RD's preferred recently-invented, man-made non-Catholic sect, anyway. Don't worry, I'm definitely over it. :yawn:That page is filled with illogical propaganda. Get over it!
Categorically refuted here and here.The ROCK is Christ and not Peter.
Your refutations are full of the same hot air that your "church" has been expelling since its evil foundation as it attempted to steal Jesus Christ for itself.Salza has outlined the authoritative teaching of Christ's one historic Church---who could possibly refute that? Certainly not the entirely non-authoritative opinions of RD's preferred recently-invented, man-made non-Catholic sect.
...according to the entirely non-authoritative opinions of RD's preferred recently-invented, man-made non-Catholic sect, anyway. Don't worry, I'm definitely over it. :yawn:
Categorically refuted here and here.
Gaudium de veritate,
Cruciform
+T+
Once again: ...according to the entirely non-authoritative opinions of RD's preferred recently-invented, man-made non-Catholic sect, anyway.Your refutations are full of the same hot air that your "church" has been expelling since its evil foundation as it attempted to steal Jesus Christ for itself.
Already answered (Post #175).Peter NEVER claimed the sort of authority that your sect of Satan wants.
Salza has outlined the authoritative teaching of Christ's one historic Church---who could possibly refute that? Certainly not the entirely non-authoritative opinions of RD's preferred recently-invented, man-made non-Catholic sect.
...according to the entirely non-authoritative opinions of RD's preferred recently-invented, man-made non-Catholic sect, anyway. Don't worry, I'm definitely over it. :yawn:
Categorically refuted here and here.
Gaudium de veritate,
Cruciform
+T+
I am so adopting this into my vocab!
My parents made be a Catholic as a child. I was until my 2nd child was born and the church refused to baptize him because I didn't give enough money. A few words where exchanged, needless to say I was excommunicated. Best thing that ever happened to me.