ECT What is your view of MAD and MADists? (Strictly for people who are not mad)
- Thread starter andyc
- Start date
dodge
New member
Your doubt does not change the FACT that I read it.
dodge
New member
lol, you spotted yourself !
dodge
New member
Nope, I accept the scriptures for what they say NOT to support an agenda that scripture does NOT support.
dodge
New member
You might want to apply that standard to yourself.
musterion
Well-known member
Good. He did not say the woman was forgiven, only that He didn't condemn her per the Law because He couldn't.
dodge
New member
You FORCE scripture to support that which scripture does NOT support. Your loss not mine.
Doesn't matter what Jesus KNEW. This was about the law. And the law had certain steps that had to be taken to condemn someone.
musterion
Well-known member
He did NOT say she was forgiven; only that He did not condemn her.
You FORCE the Scripture to support that which Scripture does NOT support. Your loss not mine.
dodge
New member
YOU are ignoring the following verse which actually has a meaning.
Jhn 1:17
For the law was given by Moses, but grace and truth came by Jesus Christ.
Wait, do you think Jesus granted her eternal life?
From whom did Moses receive the law?
dodge
New member
I said Jesus showed the woman grace make of it what you will.
Jhn 1:17
For the law was given by Moses, but grace and truth came by Jesus Christ.
Matthew 5:17-18 KJV
(17) Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfil.
(18) For verily I say unto you, Till heaven and earth pass, one jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass from the law, till all be fulfilled.
dodge
New member
Jhn 1:17
For the law was given by Moses, but grace and truth came by Jesus Christ.
That verse actually has a meaning. YOU might want to read and study Jn. 1:17
musterion
Well-known member
That wasn't grace He showed. It was Law, which cannot be broken.
She got off on what amounts to a technicality because the Pharisees let the man she was caught with get away, in violation of Lev 20:10.
It's clear you don't believe the Scripture because you refuse to heed it.
musterion
Well-known member
That right there is the only reason she could not be legally condemned. Had He agreed with her stoning, He would have gone back on what He said in Matthew 5 by breaking Lev 20:10.