Wick Stick
Well-known member
He didn't say that you started the thread.
Danoh said:...when you're not starting your own threads against MAD...
One of us is having a reading comprehension problem. I don't think it's me.
He didn't say that you started the thread.
Danoh said:...when you're not starting your own threads against MAD...
One of us is having a reading comprehension problem. I don't think it's me.
I was referring to this:One of us is having a reading comprehension problem. I don't think it's me.
Look in the mirror o duplicitous one - you do the same to EVERY MAD started thread - when you're not starting your own threads against MAD despite both your consistently professed and just as consistently proven DETERMINED WILLFUL ignorance of things MAD :chuckle:
One of us is having a reading comprehension problem. I don't think it's me.
I guess I just got lumped in with some trolls you're having problems with because I disagreed with you. Whatever. Check my post history. I post here maybe one day every 3 weeks. I'm not stalking you, or the MAD men and women.
And yes, i am ignorant of MAD doctrine. I tried to learn some from the people here, but thus far all anyone has done is make fun of my questions.
Yeah, ok.My apology whether merited or not.
What is it you wish to know about MAD - the core organizing principle?
Some other question?
Keep in mind though, that, as with any school of thought in life in general, let alone with any faith, even individuals within a same school of thought are bound to find, at times, that they hold to different understandings on one thing or another.
Discussed among MADs.Run-of-the-mill dispensationalism organizes 7 dispensations correlating to the 7 churches in the apocalypse. Does MAD do so as well? If so, which church does it identify with the current age?
Gonna depend on which Abe covenant you talk about.Is MAD hostile to covenant theology? In particular, most covenant theology posits the New Covenant as a fulfillment or resurrection of the Abrahamic covenant, rather than an entirely different set of 'house-rules.'
Baptisim is a purification rite for Israel.The Bible puts a difference between John's baptism and Jesus' baptism. Does MAD put them into different dispensations, or the same one? If the same one, how do you reconcile having different baptisms within the same covenant/dispensation?
Does MAD believe in the continued practice of baptism? If so, is it important? If so, what does MAD say baptism is? A ceremonial declaration? An initiation? An adoption? Is the moment of regeneration tied to baptism?
One of the main tenets of MAD is separating Israel from the BOC.How does MAD account for the OT separation of the Northern Kingdom (House of Israel) and Southern Kingdom (House of Judah) into discreet entities that God dealt with separately? Traditional dispensationalism doesn't seem to have a good handle on how there could be multiple oikonomia (dispensations, house rules) corresponding to multiple houses.
Likewise, how does MAD account for the re-unification of the two entities? Does it believe this is already accomplished? If so, did it happen in OT times, or NT times, or when?
Most are probably pre-tirb.Do MAD's have a uniform eschatology? If so, are you pre-trib, post-trib, post-mil, or what? It appears you aren't preterists, but I don't know much more than that.
Scripture.Does MAD embrace Sola Scriptura? Sola Fide? Sola Gratia? If not, does it have similar formal or informal doctrines?
I would say that most believe the sign gifts have ceased for now.I gather that MAD is not cessationist in its views. Does MAD believe in continuing revelation? Is there a link between MAD and Charismatic beliefs?
It begins with Paul and the revelation given to him by the risen Lord that was not revealed by the prophets.Does MAD link its genesis to a certain place/time/person? If so, where/when/who?
No official position.Does MAD have a dogmatic position on creation / Genesis 1-2?
Absolutely.Does MAD believe in a future role for (national, physical, according to the flesh) Israel?
Excellent post Tam!Discussed among MADs.
Some do, some don't.
I don't (think the 7 churches represent 7 dispensations).
Nor do I think the 7 churches (congregations) are of the BOC, but are of Israel.
Gonna depend on which Abe covenant you talk about.
Paul compares our salvation with the covenant God made to Abe in Genesis 12, when Abe was uncircumcised and did nothing (ie. was asleep while GOD passed through the animal parts).
Later Abe was made a covenant that included circumcision (the literal flesh circumcision), of which we (BOC) have no part in.
Baptisim is a purification rite for Israel.
Making the unclean, clean, for worship.
Paul, the apostle with the gospel for the BOC was not sent to baptize (1Co 1:17), as the apostles for Israel were (Matt 28:19).
One of the main tenets of MAD is separating Israel from the BOC.
For the most part, we believe that the nation of Israel was split, but will be united again and the once again, united kingdom, will be restored in the future.
Most are probably pre-tirb.
Scripture.
Grace.
We don't have any formal creeds, if that's what you mean.
I would say that most believe the sign gifts have ceased for now.
It begins with Paul and the revelation given to him by the risen Lord that was not revealed by the prophets.
In other words, the prophets did not foretell of a time that Gentiles would be accepted by God DUE TO the fall of Israel. (Rom 11:11)
No official position.
Most here tend to trust the plain meaning of Genesis and the creation.
Absolutely.
That is one of the main tenets ----- that Israel and the BOC are not the same entity and are under different programs.
Israel - program of faith plus works.
BOC - program of faith without works.
Excellent post Tam!
Discussed among MADs.
Some do, some don't.
I don't (think the 7 churches represent 7 dispensations).
Nor do I think the 7 churches (congregations) are of the BOC, but are of Israel.
Gonna depend on which Abe covenant you talk about.
Paul compares our salvation with the covenant God made to Abe in Genesis 12, when Abe was uncircumcised and did nothing (ie. was asleep while GOD passed through the animal parts).
Later Abe was made a covenant that included circumcision (the literal flesh circumcision), of which we (BOC) have no part in.
Baptisim is a purification rite for Israel.
Making the unclean, clean, for worship.
Paul, the apostle with the gospel for the BOC was not sent to baptize (1Co 1:17), as the apostles for Israel were (Matt 28:19).
One of the main tenets of MAD is separating Israel from the BOC.
For the most part, we believe that the nation of Israel was split, but will be united again and the once again, united kingdom, will be restored in the future.
Most are probably pre-tirb.
Scripture.
Grace.
We don't have any formal creeds, if that's what you mean.
I would say that most believe the sign gifts have ceased for now.
It begins with Paul and the revelation given to him by the risen Lord that was not revealed by the prophets.
In other words, the prophets did not foretell of a time that Gentiles would be accepted by God DUE TO the fall of Israel. (Rom 11:11)
No official position.
Most here tend to trust the plain meaning of Genesis and the creation.
Absolutely.
That is one of the main tenets ----- that Israel and the BOC are not the same entity and are under different programs.
Israel - program of faith plus works.
BOC - program of faith without works.
So then, the world was made through the body of Christ, the body of God, but after Adam and Eve sinned, they were put out of the body, but could remain NEAR God by obedience.
Abel stayed near God by faith and obedience, Cain was kept further away from God.
In the times of Noah, Noah was kept near to God and the rest besides his family were kept further away.
In the time of Abraham, Abraham was near God, the body, because of his faith and obedience, and then a promise came to Abraham that all will be brought not only near God, but back in God, by the body of God, the body of Christ come in the flesh.
Perhaps most ridiculous, but not wide ranging is that the 7 churches are about Israel.
If you mean body of Christ in the way MAD does, and contrast to Israel, it's now how the NT sees things.
Abraham was NEAR GOD, but did not live to see the promise, he did not live to be put 'in' the body, but he watched from a far and then was put in the body when Christ reconciled the world to him.What the Bible is concerned with is how we are justified before God, and even though it seems out of place in the narrative of Gen 12-20, there it is, when Abraham believes about his posterity. This is why the NT quotes that so much.
It does not necessarily change your path or fortune in life to be justified, although it is obviously a source of great joy.
So it is not as though that is dramatically changed between the two periods, either. The NT is a matter of an awaited for promise being fulfilled in the resurrection, which is an event in which the redemptive power of God broke into this world and history, and showed that he was the perfect work of God and was enthroned.
Terrible post IP. Not even good enough to even have holes. It's just one big HOLE.full of holes.
WE MUST INTERP THE OT THE WAY THE NT DOES IN SPECIFICS--ACTUAL QUOTES. I'm sure Tam did not originate this stuff, but 2P2P is not in the NT and therefore not in the OT--if you are an apostle-abiding believer. If you do the OT directly, you are under the veil and can't see Christ, which is our business as Christians. So make up you mind what you are.
The 'Gentiles not known' remark is too ridiculous to consider. It is all over the OT, in Genesis, in Job (non-jewish) in Jonah, in Isaiah. Amateur.
If the NT does not develop a theme about the covenant, ignore it. don't use the OT after the fact to undermine what the NT says.
Perhaps most ridiculous, but not wide ranging is that the 7 churches are about Israel. 2P2P does not exist and those were churches, which had all ethnes in them for quite a while.