Your argument is false because it is based on a flawed interpretation of scripture.
So, you are free to offer, and defend, another.
DR said:
Left to our own devices we end up with a fallacious conclusion.
Too true.
DR said:
Your interpretation cannot possibly be right for this reason alone.
Au contraire, I am not left to my own devices. See John 16:13.
DR said:
You interpret the scripture using flawed human language which is in turn based on flawed and broken human experience.
Language communicates experience, it is not based on experience. Were that the case, every person would have their own language as no two persons experience reality identically.
Communication has its faults, don't get me wrong, but it has an objective quality that our interpretations of our experiences don't have.
DR said:
You have offered no reason why anyone should trust your interpretation.
Again, you are free to offer an alternative interpretation. I don't expect anyone to trust my interpretation
because it is my interpretation. I submit my interpretation for others to review and make up their own minds whether it accords with what the biblical testimony says or not.
You can play the "That's just
your interpretation" game all you like. It doesn't erase the contrast that bible believers see between the veracity of God's revealed word and the tenuousness of our knowledge based on human experience.
If you would like to prioritize your experiences over biblical revelation rather than prioritize biblical revelation over your experiences you are welcome to do so.
But be honest about how you arrive at your conclusions. If your theological conclusions on this matter are based on how your theory accords to your experience rather than God's Word, then just say so.
If this isn't the case, then whether or not your experiences prop up your theology are incidental and largely unimportant.