Yeppers.John 1:1 (AKJV/PCE)(1:1) In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.
The Word was not created.
The Word has always existed WITH God and IS God.
Yeppers.John 1:1 (AKJV/PCE)(1:1) In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.
I don't have to. The Bible just says it plainly and your reject truth.PROVE IT IF YOU CAN.
The house heretic disagrees with the Bible.Yeppers.
The Word was not created.
The Word has always existed WITH God and IS God.
Yeppers.
The Word was not created.
The Word has always existed WITH God and IS God.
The house heretic disagrees with the Bible.
It's time (in my opinion) for a long-term ban on this Christ rejecter that just keeps bashing the LORD JESUS CHRIST.
The Greeker heretic only goes to "the Greek" if he can pervert a verse. The GREEK work TRANSLATED "express image" has NOTHING to with modern use of the ENGLISH word IMAGE as in photograph or picture.The son is the EXPRESS IMAGE of YHWH. YHWH is a SPIRIT not a man. I see this as the logos (word). The logos is a created form of God. The logos became one with the body prepared for it.
The son is the EXACT IMAGE, ALL IMAGES are creations. The spirit son is a creature not God. He is a created form of God. He was given the power of his God.
You always want to change God's Word, but that's what unbelieving heretics do.I believe that John 1:1 has been corrupted by the Greek to English translations. It is the most misunderstood verse in the Bible.
You're on the outside looking in.You spreading false tales again RD.
I disagree with the common interpretation of scripture that the churches hold on to.
I do not bash my God or my Lord, you just are unable to see truth. You believe in the errors of the early RCC fathers over the words of Christ.
Insults from a rank heretic.
More heresy.
You "opened the door of your mind" and your brains fell out.
I agree, and that includes language.I said
God created everything.
Peter's confession: "Thou art the Christ, the Son of the living God" (Mt16:16KJV) is an encapsulation of the Trinity. Peter confesses that the Lord Jesus is God, and the particular way in which He is God, is that He is 'the Son of the Living God,' and in no other way, which leaves only the Trinity as an option. And that's what the Church (today's 'Catholic Church') has ALWAYS taught and believed. Christ then told Peter, "thou art Peter, and upon this rock I will build my church" (Mt16:18KJV), which means that He would build His Church upon both the man Peter, and upon Peter's confession, which was that God is the Trinity....the Trinity theology that the RCC set many years ago....
Col 1 is not speaking of Jesus, Jesus was not at the creation. Jesus was BORN not SENT.
Heb 1 also disagrees with you.
Heb 1:8 But unto the Son he saith, Thy throne, O God, is for ever and ever: a sceptre of righteousness is the sceptre of thy kingdom.
Heb 1:9 Thou hast loved righteousness, and hated iniquity; therefore God, even thy God, hath anointed thee with the oil of gladness above thy fellows.
Heb 1:10 And, Thou, Lord, in the beginning hast laid the foundation of the earth; and the heavens are the works of thine hands:
who do you think this passage is referring to - He is the image of the invisible God if it is not Jesus. Who else represents the image of God himself that could also be described as the first of Gods creative works?He is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn of all creation
Peter's confession: "Thou art the Christ, the Son of the living God" (Mt16:16KJV) is an encapsulation of the Trinity. Peter confesses that the Lord Jesus is God, and the particular way in which He is God, is that He is 'the Son of the Living God,' and in no other way, which leaves only the Trinity as an option. And that's what the Church (today's 'Catholic Church') has ALWAYS taught and believed. Christ then told Peter, "thou art Peter, and upon this rock I will build my church" (Mt16:18KJV), which means that He would build His Church upon both the man Peter, and upon Peter's confession, which was that God is the Trinity.
None of those scriptures you've quoted support your position nor refute mine so not sure why you've quoted them.
Bearing in mind the context of the verse in colossians i qouted is very clear who do you think this passage is referring to - He is the image of the invisible God if it is not Jesus. Who else represents the image of God himself that could also be described as the first of Gods creative works?
Consider that the EXPRESS image of God is a spirit. His firstborn of all creatures/creation. He sent this son to dwell in the body of his flesh son. That was the body prepared to hold the logos. The man Jesus could die for our sins. He is the Lamb of God. The logos spirit that was in him is a FORM of God. This is the son of man that came from above. Only the son of man decended from heaven.
It proves that there is only ONE true God as Jesus told us. It questions the Trinity theology that the RCC set many years ago. The key word EXPRESS image proves the point that God created his spirit son who is considered the right arm of the Father.
If you can see my view then I ask you to disprove it to me, no one has so far. I feel that for some reason this was given to me to share.
Question:
What is God's first creation?
Answer:
In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth. Genesis 1:1
Question:
What is God's first creation?
Answer:
In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth. Genesis 1:1
Pretty simple isn't it.
Your theory has been disproved...but you will not let go of your pride. You wear this so called revelation you have with a badge of honor.
Why are you trying to skirt around it? Everything was made through the Son so the SON is God's first creation. The Son himself is a creation for he is am IMAGE. Col 1:15 says he is a creature. He is a created FORM of the Father and the Father was pleased that the son contained his fullness.
Proof you can't dispute.
Col 1:15 Who is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn of every creature:
Are you understanding my view and why I have it?