Before they ate of the tree, they had no shame or fear of being naked.
After they ate of the tree, they did.
If there was nothing at all wrong with them being naked, why the change in shame & fear about it?
Yes, that was the thinking of the Puritans too..
But if their nudity was sinful and to be ashamed of, how can we believe GOD created them that way ? and if their nudity was evil and shameful, how could it be said that they were very good?
Dictionary.com defines holy as
dedicated or devoted to the service of God, at
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/holy.
GOD is holy so HE is perfectly and unwaveringly dedicated to HIS own attributes, especially love! In other words, HE will never go against HIMself in the least.
Holy can also refer to being set apart - set apart from what? From sin and evil of course For what? For dedication to GOD's holiness of course.
So how can GOD create evil by
creating Adam and Eve as evil in their nudity or people as sinners by putting them into or under Adam's sin?
No, all sin must come from a free will decision to rebel against GOD's holiness, that is, against that which GOD is dedicated to, or no one is guilty and any interpretation that convinces GOD made us sinners without any free will choice is from the anti-Christ for it leads to the worship of an un-holy god.
Therefore, since Adam and Eve were characterized as sinful, crafty (as per the serpent) or
naked as a symbol for their self chosen sin by their free will, they must have had an experience before the garden, that is, their coming to the garden could not have been their creation but only a movement of their sinful spirits from sheol to their earthly human bodies.
Peace, Ted