And 1 John says , we know that whosoever is born of God sinneth not , but he that is begotten of God keepeth himself himself and explain how you keep yourself from sin ??
dan p
Do you think you are a perfect sinless person?
And 1 John says , we know that whosoever is born of God sinneth not , but he that is begotten of God keepeth himself himself and explain how you keep yourself from sin ??
dan p
No, but Christ died for ALL of my sins.Do you think you are a perfect sinless person?
So you are not born of God?No, but Christ died for ALL of my sins.
How do you think this distinguishes you from Catholics? And define exactly what you mean by "died for". Does that mean your choices if you choose to sin, don't have any consequences? And why would they, if Jesus "died for" them?No, but Christ died for ALL of my sins.
Please QUOTE ME saying that.How do you think this distinguishes you from Catholics?
It means that Christ paid my debt.And define exactly what you mean by "died for".
Again, did I say that?Does that mean your choices if you choose to sin, don't have any consequences?
It would be great if you made some sense.And why would they, if Jesus "died for" them?
I understand that whatever the teaching is, it does not exist in the bible. Jesus forgot to teach it and He failed to remind any of His apostles to teach it. What Jesus did teach is "It is finished."I believe that if someone is going to try to refute a teaching they must first properly understand that teaching. As of now, from what I can see, not a single one of you (except Idolator of course) understands the actual teaching of Purgatory.
The unwritten premise being, "Arguing against something that you do not COMPLETELY understand is invalid."Arguing against something that you do not even understand is just ignorance.
All of us and anyone else who has access to a dictionary...Which one of you can correctly define the teaching about Purgatory?
I understand that whatever the teaching is, it does not exist in the bible . . . .
Prove it.Well you started off with a big lie so the rest of your post (which is erroneous as well) is mute.
People here just do not know how to have a polite civil conversation.
Grow up man.
Premise 1: There will be neither sin nor attachment to sin in heaven.
Premise 2: We (at least most of us) are still sinning and are attached to sin at the end of this life.
Conclusion: Therefore there must be a period between death and heavenly glory in which the saved are cleansed of sin and their attachment to sin.
Because this is a deductive argument, if one wants to dispute the conclusion, he must take issue with one of the premises, since the conclusion follows from them necessarily.
So which is it?
Is it not true that the saved in heaven are perfectly sanctified? (“Nothing unclean shall enter [heaven].” — Rev 21:27).
Or is it not true that we are still sinning and attached to sin at the end of our earthly life? (If we say we have no sin, we deceive ourselves, and the truth is not in us.” — 1 John 1:8).
You can’t get out of this argument by asserting, as I read one man say, that Christ covers us with his righteousness the moment we are justified, and therefore God sees us as he sees his Son, Jesus. To do this would be to deny the first premise (and what the Bible teaches) and to believe, instead, that the unclean will enter heaven, but that God will kid himself into believing otherwise.
I disagree, but some posters most definitely areTHIS WEBSITE IS 100% A WASTE OF TIME!
Just to reiterate what was said in Post #2:
Premise 1: There will be neither sin nor attachment to sin in heaven.
Premise 2: We (at least most of us) are still sinning and are attached to sin at the end of this life.
Conclusion: Therefore there must be a period between death and heavenly glory in which the saved are cleansed of sin and their attachment to sin.
It is just that simple. In fact it is so simple that it takes great effort to deny this truth. What is the reason to deny this truth? Pride? Evil? Who knows.
Your premise 2 is false, or at least, incorrect.
Christians still sin, even after they are saved, but not after they die, because they are still susceptible to the things in this world, especially the flesh. (Romans 7:18)
However, we are no longer bound by sin when we are saved, as Christ has freed us from those chains. (Romans 8)
Since Premise 2 is invalid, your conclusion is also invalid.
In addition, it does not necessarily follow that there must be a period of time after death and before going to heaven, let alone one that's needed to cleanse believers, as when one dies, he leaves his flesh behind, and his soul/spirit (which has been redeemed) ascends to heaven.
Yes, we still sin, but it's not we who do evil, but sin in us.
Has then what is good become death to me? Certainly not! But sin, that it might appear sin, was producing death in me through what is good, so that sin through the commandment might become exceedingly sinful.For we know that the law is spiritual, but I am carnal, sold under sin.For what I am doing, I do not understand. For what I will to do, that I do not practice; but what I hate, that I do.If, then, I do what I will not to do, I agree with the law that it is good.But now, it is no longer I who do it, but sin that dwells in me.For I know that in me (that is, in my flesh) nothing good dwells; for to will is present with me, but how to perform what is good I do not find.For the good that I will to do, I do not do; but the evil I will not to do, that I practice.Now if I do what I will not to do, it is no longer I who do it, but sin that dwells in me.I find then a law, that evil is present with me, the one who wills to do good.For I delight in the law of God according to the inward man.But I see another law in my members, warring against the law of my mind, and bringing me into captivity to the law of sin which is in my members.O wretched man that I am! Who will deliver me from this body of death?I thank God—through Jesus Christ our Lord! So then, with the mind I myself serve the law of God, but with the flesh the law of sin. - Romans 7:13-25 http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Romans7:13-25&version=NKJV
Why not? It's what the Bible says.
False, because of the reasons given above.
The entire idea of a purgatory is an accommodation for ongoing sin.I believe that if someone is going to try to refute a teaching they must first properly understand that teaching. As of now, from what I can see, not a single one of you (except Idolator of course) understands the actual teaching of Purgatory.
Arguing against something that you do not even understand is just ignorance.
Which one of you can correctly define the teaching about Purgatory?
Prove it.
The entire idea of a purgatory is an accommodation for ongoing sin.
You are a liar.I have already proven my side back on page one. You have failed to refute it.
By supplying a constant remedy for sin, the initial Remedy for sin is pushed to the side and forgotten.That sentence is gobbldeygook. What does it even mean?
Yes, if you mean free of sin.I have 2 questions for you. Humor me.
1: Are you perfect right now?
It doesn't matter.2: The Seraphim angels are the burning ones. Why do they burn?
He's a bigger idiot than even you are! He thinks he doesn't ever do anything wrong.That sentence is gobbldeygook. What does it even mean?
1: Are you perfect right now?
Yes, if you mean free of sin.
I have 2 questions for you. Humor me.
1: Are you perfect right now?
2: The Seraphim angels are the burning ones. Why do they burn?
He's a bigger idiot than even you are!
I guess as long as that's not what you meant ...Please QUOTE ME saying that.