What does God's Holy Law Demand?

JonahofAkron

New member
Well, those who were saved under the law, remained under it until their physical death but Paul was the first member of the Body of Christ, the first to be saved under the Gospel of Grace. God cut off Israel with the stoning of Stephen, converted Paul on the Damascus Road and sent him first to Israel and eventually to the Gentiles. Some years later, the twelve agreed with Paul that they would stay in Israel and minister to "The Circumcision" and he (Paul) would go to the "Uncircumcision" (i.e. the Gentiles). Thus, for a time, there were two groups. There were Jews saved under the Kingdom Gospel who followed Moses as they always had minus the potions of the Law which were fulfilled in Christ (i.e. the sacrificial system and related laws). These believers are who a large segment of the New Testament were written too and about (i.e. Hebrews - Revelation). The other group was made up of both Jews and Gentiles but has nothing to do with Israel's Kingdom and the members of this group are not members of the nation of Israel nor do any of Israel's promises apply to them. They instead are members of the Body of Christ and are hidden in Him, identified in Him. We are righteous in Him because He is righteous, not because of what we do but because of what He has already done. We are citizens of heaven and have a heavenly calling unlike Israel and the Jews who have their citizenship in the Nation of Israel and have an Earthly calling.

This is the doctrine you get when you pay attention to context (i.e. who is saying what to whom) and allow the text of scripture to mean what it plainly states.

Resting in Him,
Clete

Sorry, let me clarify before you post some snide and rude comment.

The ends that you discuss are not biblical. Where do you get those assumptions? Paul being the first of the Body? Two separate gospels? This is incredibly disturbing.

Sent from my SM-N910T using TheologyOnline mobile app
 

Clete

Truth Smacker
Silver Subscriber
And I would say neither. Because they are the two different sides of the same coin.

James says that your faith will produce and that's how we know you actually have faith.

Paul clearly says that the faith is the important piece of this. He is saying that he was not justified by works.

They cannot be in opposition.

Sent from my SM-N910T using TheologyOnline mobile app

Nope that most certainly is NOT what James says. He makes the exact OPPOSITE point that Paul makes using the same man as an example!

James states EXPLICITLY that you are saved BY WORKS!

Paul states EXPLICITLY that it is he "WHO DOES NOT WORK" but believes that is saved.

James 2: 24 You see then that a man is justified by works, and not by faith only.

25 Likewise, was not Rahab the harlot also justified by works when she received the messengers and sent them out another way?

26 For as the body without the spirit is dead, so faith without works is dead also.



Romans 4:5 But to him who does not work but believes on Him who justifies the ungodly, his faith is accounted for righteousness,​

They say opposite things. If your doctrine is correct, one of them is a liar. If mine is correct, both mean exactly what they seem to mean, they're simply talking to two different audiences.

Resting in Him,
Clete
 

JonahofAkron

New member
Nope that most certainly is NOT what James says. He makes the exact OPPOSITE point that Paul makes using the same man as an example!

James states EXPLICITLY that you are saved BY WORKS!

Paul states EXPLICITLY that it is he "WHO DOES NOT WORK" but believes that is saved.

James 2: 24 You see then that a man is justified by works, and not by faith only.

25 Likewise, was not Rahab the harlot also justified by works when she received the messengers and sent them out another way?

26 For as the body without the spirit is dead, so faith without works is dead also.



Romans 4:5 But to him who does not work but believes on Him who justifies the ungodly, his faith is accounted for righteousness,​

They say opposite things. If your doctrine is correct, one of them is a liar. If mine is correct, both mean exactly what they seem to mean, they're simply talking to two different audiences.

Resting in Him,
Clete
Then there are two gospels. What are their messages?

Sent from my SM-N910T using TheologyOnline mobile app
 

Clete

Truth Smacker
Silver Subscriber
Sorry, let me clarify before you post some snide and rude comment.

The ends that you discuss are not biblical. Where do you get those assumptions? Paul being the first of the Body? Two separate gospels? This is incredibly disturbing.

Sent from my SM-N910T using TheologyOnline mobile app

They aren't assumptions and to establish them biblically would require hours and hours and thousands of words.

If you're actually interested in a full biblical establishment of these doctrines there are lots of resources from which to choose. Here's two...

The Plot by Bob Enyart

Things That Differ by C.R. Stam

The first is better (the best I've seen) but is not free. The second is good but does make what I feel are some small mistakes. It is free.

Enjoy!


Resting in Him,
Clete
 

God's Truth

New member
I have no idea what the heck you're talking about!

Maybe if you spoke in more than ten syllable posts, the discussion would be more productive.

How do you get your put downs are the right thing to do?

I might not always write a lot of words, but what I do say has a lot of meaning.

You write too much.

Who wants to spend so much time readying all that?
 

Clete

Truth Smacker
Silver Subscriber
What in the world? Where did you get all of that?

Sent from my SM-N910T using TheologyOnline mobile app

I expected that response. Welcome to the paradigm wall!

Your paradigm won't allow you to see it, no matter what I say because you've not been brought to a place where you'll even permit the notion that your own paradigm could conceivably be incorrect. That's not a criticism of you, that's just the way the human mind works. Attempting to convince you of my doctrine would be akin to trying to convince 12th century Catholics that the Earth orbited the Sun. The context just isn't there to allow it.

However, I will provide a hand full of verses that might help you at least see that I'm not just pulling this stuff out of thin air...

"...those who were saved under the law, remained under it until their physical death..." Romans 11:29

"...Paul was the first member of the Body of Christ, the first to be saved under the Gospel of Grace." 1 Timothy 1:15-16

"...the twelve agreed with Paul that they would stay in Israel and minister to "The Circumcision" and he (Paul) would go to the "Uncircumcision" (i.e. the Gentiles)." Galatians 2:9


That's a taste. Understand, however, that I avoid proof texting at almost any cost and do not intend the above to even be an argument, never mind proof. It's intended only to demonstrate that I'm not just making this stuff up our of whole cloth.

Resting in Him,
Clete
 

God's Truth

New member
If that were true, there would have been no need for Paul's ministry to begin with. Jesus already had twelve apostles which had both the great commission (which they didn't follow) and the Holy Spirit to guide them. Paul came on the seen because God changed what he was doing. Instead of sending Christ back to give Israel their kingdom, He instead cut Israel off because of their rejection of their King and turn instead to the Gentiles through Paul.

Wow. That is nonsense. Paul tells us why Jesus sent him. It was to show that even people with grave sins could be forgiven---that is what Paul explains.
 

Clete

Truth Smacker
Silver Subscriber
How do you get your put downs are the right thing to do?
Treating people who say stupid things as though they haven't, tacitly endorses their stupidity.

Further, I've been no more hostile toward you than you have been toward me (see post immediately preceding this one). No hypocrisy, please!

If you post substance, I'll respond with substance. If you want to be hostile, I'll do that too. You pick.

I might not always write a lot of words, but what I do say has a lot of meaning.
You have to at least write enough to allow what you say to retain the context you intend. I have no idea what you're referring to when you say that I said that Jesus was a Jew to you. Of course He was a Jew! Who ever suggested otherwise and in what context? I cannot read your mind.

You write too much.

Who wants to spend so much time readying all that?
No one is forcing you to read any of it! I write what I want. I try my best not to be a waste of time but if you feel like I am a waste of your time then there's a simple solution for you. Don't read my posts! It's no skin off my nose! There's a list of people as long as my arm that seem to really enjoy the things I write and seem to get a lot out of it, which is what keeps me here doing all this. If you're not in that group, how is that my problem? I don't solicit your approval nor do I need it. I have no doubt that we have at least that much in common.


Resting in Him,
Clete
 

Ben Masada

New member
I believe these verses about the avenger of blood talk about someone having been killed unintentionally. There was no premeditation.Is this different from murder? I also don't know what a manslayer is.

One is a murder until proven innocent. During all the time in a city of refuge and the High Priest is alive, if the killer, by accident or not, flees the city and is caught by the avenger of the blood and is killed, nothing will happen to the avenger of the blood. However, if the avenger of the blood pursues the man slayer, even into the city of refuge, the avenger of the blood becomes a murder himself.

Fantastic system of justice! Don't you think so Jacob?

[/QUOTE]
 
Last edited:

Jacob

BANNED
Banned
What's not to follow?

Do you suppose I'm attempting to take you captive in some way or to deceive you?

The verse you site isn't a prohibition against philosophy per se! It couldn't be because it teaching you philosophy!

It's simply telling you to be on your guard against lies! Don't allow yourself to be tricked into believing things that are false by some sort of fancy intellectual foot work. Be smart, think and use Christ (i.e. God) as your standard of truth.

Okay now, seriously, this is your final chance with me. If you want to be intellectually challenged and think through your beliefs and see if they survive the process (they will if they're true) then you WILL directly respond to what I've said with something of substance. If you don't, I'll leave you to whatever the hell it is that you think you're doing here and you can waste someone else's time....

Would you or would you not agree with the following....

If God were to say that its just fine to murder your neighbor so long and he has made you really, really mad then that would not make murder right, it would mean that God is evil.

That's because right and wrong are not determined by fiat. God is NOT arbitrary. God is not good because He says so but because He does rightly. Right and wrong are not so because God said it, God said it because it is so.​

Resting in Him,
Clete

Again, you are dealing with hypotheticals, and you said so. I cannot agree to that. What God has said is true and God doesn't do anything contrary to His word.
 

Clete

Truth Smacker
Silver Subscriber
Wow. That is nonsense. Paul tells us why Jesus sent him. It was to show that even people with grave sins could be forgiven---that is what Paul explains.

The Twelve couldn't have sent that message?!

That's what your doctrine implies.
 

jamie

New member
LIFETIME MEMBER
I don't put down Jesus, I put you down.

And the King will answer and say to them, "Assuredly, I say to you, inasmuch as you did it to one of the least of these My brethren, you did it to Me." (Matthew 25:40)​

Bah da bing!
 

Clete

Truth Smacker
Silver Subscriber
Again, you are dealing with hypotheticals, and you said so. I cannot agree to that. What God has said is true and God doesn't do anything contrary to His word.

I didn't suggest otherwise.

I think that perhaps its just an intelligence thing. There's nothing I said that is the slightest bit confusing or difficult to follow and yet you cannot seem to grasp it. I'll presume for your sake that it isn't that you're incapable, just willfully ignorant.

I won't waste any more time attempting to get willfully the blind to see.


:wave2:
 

Clete

Truth Smacker
Silver Subscriber
And the King will answer and say to them, "Assuredly, I say to you, inasmuch as you did it to one of the least of these My brethren, you did it to Me." (Matthew 25:40)​

Bah da bing!

Stupidity.

Is this really the sort of thing that convinces you of things? If so, you're hopeless.
 

Jacob

BANNED
Banned
I didn't suggest otherwise.

I think that perhaps its just an intelligence thing. There's nothing I said that is the slightest bit confusing or difficult to follow and yet you cannot seem to grasp it. I'll presume for your sake that it isn't that you're incapable, just willfully ignorant.

I won't waste any more time attempting to get willfully the blind to see.


:wave2:

I am saying I believe God's word. Shalom.
 
Top