You're so wise in your own eyes ... and impervious to FACTS and the TRUTH.
The truth is to Dodge, what Kryptonite is to Superman.
You're so wise in your own eyes ... and impervious to FACTS and the TRUTH.
WATER baptism ITSELF is SYMBOLIC.
Excellent summation.
Cleansing.... Israel had several of them in the law.Symbolic of what?
Cleansing.... Israel had several of them in the law.
Read the law in your Bible and find out (warning: jamie rabbit trail alert).So when I take a shower am I baptizing myself?
How clean does a person need to be?
Read the law in your Bible and find out (warning: jamie rabbit trail alert).
Cleansing.... Israel had several of them in the law.
Heb 6:2 (AKJV/PCE)(6:2) Of the doctrine of baptisms, and of laying on of hands, and of resurrection of the dead, and of eternal judgment.
No, it's not. It's pure Ignorance. However, if you desire ignorance over truth, that's your choice and I'll back up your right to believe it.
NO, essentially it does not. This is why some of you are so confused. You have bogus definitions that you use do support that story.
WATER baptism ITSELF is SYMBOLIC.
There are SEVERAL water baptisms in the law for the priesthood of Israel. This is why the Hebrews contains "doctrines of baptisms", plural.
Heb 6:1-2 (AKJV/PCE)(6:1) Therefore leaving the principles of the doctrine of Christ, let us go on unto perfection; not laying again the foundation of repentance from dead works, and of faith toward God, (6:2) Of the doctrine of baptisms, and of laying on of hands, and of resurrection of the dead, and of eternal judgment.
God gave Israel more than one water baptism.
That's cute.
Your "definition" is not the "natural definition".
Are you talking about the time when you went over on dry land? Yes, that was a wonderful dry baptism. Why were the baptized UNTO Moses?Well. we know that when Christ brought his people out of Egypt he baptized them in the sea.
Which people? His people? Yes, that's fine with me too.I guess Christ wants people to be baptized through water and that is fine with me.
I have been baptized by ONE Spirit with the ONE baptism for the body of Christ. Thanks.I have complied, how about you?
Mar 16:16
He that believeth and is baptized shall be saved; but he that believeth not shall be damned.
And yet many of Israel's baptisms were sprinkling.Definition of the Greek word Baptizo
1. to dip repeatedly, to immerse, to submerge (of vessels sunk)
2. to cleanse by dipping or submerging, to wash, to make clean with water, to wash one's self, bathe
3. to overwhelm
Here is an inconvenient verse for you:
Mark 7:4 And when they come from the market, except they wash (baptizo), they eat not. And many other things there be, which they have received to hold, as the washing (baptismos, form of the same word) of cups, and pots, brasen vessels, and of tables.
And yet many of Israel's baptisms were sprinkling.
You're not a kingdom of priests.
The first 4 books of the so-called "new testament" are OLD testament. But you know that... death of the testator thing.The first 5 books of the New Testament are full of literal, physical baptisms.
Read (and study) the ENTIRE Bible. You might learn something about Israel and their priesthood.There was never sprinkling there.
Oh boy.... John baptized with water....You find references to John baptizing in a place because there was "much water". The Ethiopian Eunuch "came up out of the water".
Because I understand it in its ENTIRETY.The Apostles, including Paul, baptized people in water.
Why fight the black and white truth of God's word?
The first 4 books of the so-called "new testament" are OLD testament. But you know that... death of the testator thing.
Read (and study) the ENTIRE Bible. You might learn something about Israel and their priesthood.
Oh boy.... John baptized with water....
John 1:31 (AKJV/PCE)(1:31) And I knew him not: but that he should be made manifest to Israel, therefore am I come baptizing with water.
Is this one more of my "inconvenient truths"?
Because I understand it in its ENTIRETY.
Why don't you ask those that say that?Answer this... if Paul was as actively opposed to the works of faith (obedience) as some insist he was, he would have ran as far as he could away from water baptism, knowing the tendency of human nature to affix a high value on anything that was that closely connected with conversion.
You just keep trying to get away from the ONE baptism and get YOUR actions with water to have some significance.Instead, you find him baptizing some, and having others baptized by his assistants. The Bible doesn't record the details of what was taught the night of the earthquake, but something Paul and Silas said convinced the jailer that baptism was important - so important, in fact, that Paul had him baptized between midnight and dawn.
Paul did NOT "promote" water baptism. He learned as God revealed it to him that he (Paul) was NOT sent to baptize BUT to preach the gospel.Paul was a lion-heart. Anyone who would rebuke Peter to his face for sliding back into his law-habits would not hesitate to stand loudly and proudly for truth, as evidenced by him charging on full-speed in the face of prophecies about his ultimate incarceration and death.
Paul promoted baptism for both Jews, Gentiles, and re-baptism for those who had not been baptized in the name of Jesus. These are the truths that must be answered.
Mark 16:17-20 (AKJV/PCE)(16:17) And these signs shall follow them that believe; In my name shall they cast out devils; they shall speak with new tongues; (16:18) They shall take up serpents; and if they drink any deadly thing, it shall not hurt them; they shall lay hands on the sick, and they shall recover. (16:19) ¶ So then after the Lord had spoken unto them, he was received up into heaven, and sat on the right hand of God. (16:20) And they went forth, and preached every where, the Lord working with [them], and confirming the word with signs following. Amen.
These SIGNS are following YOU?
Right Divider;4852707]The first 4 books of the so-called "new testament" are OLD testament. But you know that... death of the testator thing.
Read (and study) the ENTIRE Bible. You might learn something about Israel and their priesthood.
Is this one more of my "inconvenient truths"?
Because I understand it in its ENTIRETY.
No, I'm saying that YOU do not understand the Bible. You do not understand the CONTEXT of Jesus Christ and His TWELVE disciples.Let me get this straight you are making a case against "believing" and being "baptized" right ?
Mar 16:16
He that believeth and is baptized shall be saved; but he that believeth not shall be damned.