Won’t work ≠ can’t work.
Won’t work ≠ can’t work.
A story can convey more than one intent or purpose and the inhumanity of treating those in poverty like scum is pretty darn blatant as one.
Whereas I suppose it would be biblical to cast off the poor and let the chips fall where they may at the whims of charity? If it's biblical to let the poor starve and the homeless rot then the rich man really didn't do anything wrong did he, because what you suggest would result in that and an exponential increase of it as well. Maybe you can show where it's biblical to grumble about where your taxes go?
You are clueless.
He wasn't working and he begged for food.
Why was the rich man wrong in denying him even the scraps of food off his table?
Plenty here seem to think that those who don't work shouldn't eat so does this apply to all the homeless 'bums' and those down on their luck as well?
Do you think the point Jesus was trying to get across was...
A) The government should have forcefully taken money from the rich man and given it to Lazarus.
or
B) The rich man should have voluntarily helped Lazarus.
Unfortunately for you leftists who want to paint Jesus Christ as some left wing social activist who uses the force of government to take from one to give to another (while creating a huge bureaucracy), that's not the case here.
Charitable giving (whether it be money or your time spent helping charitable causes, or both) is a huge part of Christianity, but as you failed to point out by not showing any evidence in Scripture, Jesus doesn't want government involved.
BTW, do you realize that it's certain types of government (secular humanist/atheist) where the poor are much more prevalent?
is there anything in scripture to suggest that the rich man denied lazarus the scraps of food off his table?
Well he certainly wasn't invited in was he? Or are you just going to be irritably pedantic on the matter?
lain:
The only 'painting' being done here is by you, and it's a rather clumsy abstract one at that. What you advocate is nothing short of escalating a poverty you've likely never experienced yourself but hey, all those scribes and pharisees were probably 'left wingers' eh?
Nobody's saying it isn't but then promoting a state that doesn't make provision for the poor and those who would inevitably suffer without regular aid is hardly one borne of charity is it?
What you describe in your latter hardly pertains to the West, so maybe it's about time to get back to your little blog. It's getting lonely...
Again: Like every good little left winger does, you've attempted to use Holy Scripture to back your Godless socialist agenda. Once again: you failed miserably.
A state that gives tax donations to it's citizens for charitable donations is hardly "promoting a state that doesn't make provision for the poor" is it Art?
The "West" being countries that were founded upon Judeo-Christian doctrine. Thanks for acknowledging that atheist countries are where the real poverty is because of their type of government (a government that over taxes it's populace and doesn't embrace the free enterprise system of government).
Who?One of England's best is coming to work for us because people like AB are too stupid to appreciate him. Oh well.
One of England's best is coming to work for us because people like AB are too stupid to appreciate him. Oh well.
Do you think the point Jesus was trying to get across was...
A) The government should have forcefully taken money from the rich man and given it to Lazarus.
or
B) The rich man should have voluntarily helped Lazarus.
What, those are the only options available?
It ain't a game show GJ...
How about those who oppose a welfare system explain just how the impoverished are going to be catered for and just how charity will reach all those in need?
Take it away...
The poor should receive free catering from Olive Gardenwhy should the impoverished expect to be catered for?
One of England's best is coming to work for us because people like AB are too stupid to appreciate him. Oh well.
Farrage will fit right in the Trump administration.
http://www.gaystarnews.com/article/nigel-farage-ukip-not-anti-gay040515-0/#gs.twsIjFA